[Sks-devel] Status Update

2014-01-08 Thread Simon Lange
Hi folks,

finally our keyserver has reached its final destination. ;)
please reenable gossip for it, in case u did disable it (service wasnt
reachable for the last three weeks.)

Especially please add me again admins of:
sks.research.nxfifteen.me.uk 11370 # Stuart McCulloch Anderson
 A7EEB609
keys.alderwick.co.uk 11370 # Andrew Alderwick 
0xC6BEA800
key-server.nl 11370 # Wijnand Modderman-Lenstra 
0x294DF221
pgp.sighalt.de 11370 # Jakob Roessler  0x746BAC9E
keyserver.serviz.fr 11370 # robert  0xEF333C7E
sks-peer.spodhuis.org 11370  # Phil Pennock 
0x3903637F
keyserver.gingerbear.net 11370 # John Clizbe 
0xD6569825
sks.keyservers.net   11370 # John Clizbe 
0xD6569825
pgp.jjim.de 11370 # Joel Garske  0xA921EB20

mine is
keys.s-l-c.biz 11370 # Simon Lange  0xBDD503BE

new gossips are always welcome. add me and tell me urs.

tyvm

Smon


-- 

Simon Lange Consulting  - Gaudystr. 6  - DE-10437 Berlin
Telefon: +49(0)30/89757206 Mobil: +49(0)151/22640160
http://s-l-c.biz


___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


Re: [Sks-devel] Status update

2013-12-27 Thread Kiss Gabor (Bitman)
> > I reloaded pages twice a minute and I found this timestamp appeared
> > at 20:45 UTC or so. Till the 19:35 UTC stats were displayed. Is
> > this intentional? Is there some artifical delay somewhere?
> >
> 
> It is the time the crawler run starts. Depending on the complexity of
> probes and the number of servers, up to 10 minutes is within the
> expected timeframe.

Oh, I see. Thanks for the clarification.

Gabor

___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


Re: [Sks-devel] Status update

2013-12-26 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 12/26/2013 09:53 PM, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote:
> Dear Kristian,
> 
> sks-keyservers.net/status/* pages have a marker: These statistics
> were last updated: 2013-12-26 20:35 (UTC)
> 
> I reloaded pages twice a minute and I found this timestamp appeared
> at 20:45 UTC or so. Till the 19:35 UTC stats were displayed. Is
> this intentional? Is there some artifical delay somewhere?
> 

It is the time the crawler run starts. Depending on the complexity of
probes and the number of servers, up to 10 minutes is within the
expected timeframe.


- -- 
- 
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Blog: http://blog.sumptuouscapital.com
Twitter: @krifisk
- 
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
- 
Nulla regula sine exceptione
No rule without exception
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=VPit
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


[Sks-devel] Status update

2013-12-26 Thread Kiss Gabor (Bitman)
Dear Kristian,

sks-keyservers.net/status/* pages have a marker:
These statistics were last updated: 2013-12-26 20:35 (UTC)

I reloaded pages twice a minute and I found this timestamp
appeared at 20:45 UTC or so. Till the 19:35 UTC stats were
displayed.
Is this intentional? Is there some artifical delay somewhere?

Regards

Gabor

___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel