RE: [freenet-support] is there any documentation
I didn't understand that answer about load either -- of course I've never know what was being "carried" in that "load." Concept clearly is meaningful only to those who understand what constitutes "load." If one knows the answer, it can be hard to understand the question. If one does not know the answer, - Original Message - From: UltraRed To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 9/16/2004 12:46:33 AM Subject: [freenet-support] is there any documentation that explains what the "load status" means on the freenet web interface? also, who do i interpret the other data under "load" on the general information page as well as the other pages? thanks. UltraRed___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] wget: a freenet trainer?
Quoting "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > do yourself a favour and do not use wget; use "puf" (google for it) > this downloader comes along fine with the '//' without being hacked and > patched, is able to download dozens of files in parallel (which is extremely > useful as transfers take a long time with freenet) and can be > configured much more in detail than wget can Oh, man... I've been searching for a downloader that would work with Freenet for a long time. I've tried big bloated website mirroring tools, browser plug-ins, and a hacked version of wget (which worked, but didn't work out). And suddenly - *poof* - comes puf. Thanks for the tip, panamerica. -todd ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Timed content
Quoting daniele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I was thinking about the incredible amount of space that is used within > freenet to hold contents that no one will never try to retrieve, > because, for example, they are obsolete. > If the person that puts the content on freenet knows that, for example, > within 1 week, it will be obsolete, because of newer releases or because > no one will know no more about its existence (eg: files shared via > frost), or for anything else, it would be great if he could specify a > time when every node keeping parts of the file can delete them (removing > the file from freenet). God no. Please not this again... This idea has been discussed before. I've looked in the archives for relevant email, but it was a long time ago and I can't find it. (using gmane anyway) Part of the problem with your idea, daniele, is that it goes against the design of the Freenet network. It amounts to censorability and there's no perceived need for it anyway. -todd ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]