[OSM-talk] Pic4Carto: efficient pictures viewer for micro-mapping

[Volker Schmidt]

Hi PanierAvide

great product!
Nearly overlooked it in the mail-stream.

Do you plan to add the possibility to visualize single picture locations in
a future version?
Would be useful in areas with many pictures.
(if that features is already implemented, please tell me how to get to it)

Volker


On 16 November 2016 at 13:00,  wrote:

> Send talk mailing list submissions to
> talk@openstreetmap.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> talk-requ...@openstreetmap.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> talk-ow...@openstreetmap.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of talk digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Re: introducing localities in wikipedia (Rory McCann)
>2. Re: introducing localities in wikipedia (Rory McCann)
>3. Central Place to Reach Wiki Administrators? (Michael Reichert)
>4. Pic4Carto: efficient pictures viewer for micro-mapping
>   (PanierAvide)
>5. Re: Taglists support for rendering examples (Matthijs Melissen)
>6. local community builders, unite? (joost schouppe)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:11:39 +0100
> From: Rory McCann 
> To: Simon Poole , talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] introducing localities in wikipedia
> Message-ID: <109247ea-7670-bce7-667f-0f69fefe8...@technomancy.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On 15/11/16 10:11, Simon Poole wrote:
> > In some aspects wikipedia is completely different than OSM, for example
> > WP has the rule of "no original research", we on the other hand want
> > exactly that (via survey).
>
> Exactly. There's a very good wiki page for Wikipedians explaining some
> of the differences:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welcome_to_Wikipedia_users
>
>
>
>
> -- next part --
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 490 bytes
> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
> URL:  20161115/ab5ae635/attachment-0002.sig>
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:11:39 +0100
> From: Rory McCann 
> To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] introducing localities in wikipedia
> Message-ID: <109247ea-7670-bce7-667f-0f69fefe8...@technomancy.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On 15/11/16 10:11, Simon Poole wrote:
> > In some aspects wikipedia is completely different than OSM, for example
> > WP has the rule of "no original research", we on the other hand want
> > exactly that (via survey).
>
> Exactly. There's a very good wiki page for Wikipedians explaining some
> of the differences:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welcome_to_Wikipedia_users
>
>
>
>
> -- next part --
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 490 bytes
> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
> URL:  20161115/ab5ae635/attachment-0003.sig>
>
> --
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:52:07 +0100
> From: Michael Reichert 
> To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: [OSM-talk] Central Place to Reach Wiki Administrators?
> Message-ID: <840ee7c1-abd9-89d9-5ae2-8429b9194...@gmx.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi,
>
> is there any method to reach all administrators of the OSM Wiki [1] in
> one go, e.g. to ask them to block a user? Currently, I have to select
> one of them and ask him at his personal discussion page. But if he has
> more important things to do, it may take some time until he reacts.
> Therefore, it is a game of change to reach them.
>
> The Data Working Group offers a central way to reach its members, it's
> d...@osmfoundation.org
>
> A central discussion page where to place messages to the administrators
> would help.
>
> Best regards
>
> Michael
>
> [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Special:ListUsers/sysop
>
> --
> Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten
> ausgenommen)
> I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)
>
> -- next part --
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 801 bytes
> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
> URL:  20161115/a7ea61b7/attachment-0001.sig>
>
> --
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:43:40 +0100
> From: PanierAvide 
> To: Talk Openstreetmap 
> Subject: [OSM-talk] Pic4Carto: efficient pictures viewer for
> micro-mapping
> Message-ID

Re: [OSM-talk] Pic4Carto: efficient pictures viewer for micro-mapping

[PanierAvide]

Hello,

Is the loading difficult for every area or just a particular one ? Maybe 
there are a lot of pictures, and as Pic4Carto requests 100 pictures per 
HTTP request for a given provider, it's possible that there are a lot 
for requests running for retrieving all the pictures metadata.


Cordially.


Le 26/11/2016 à 18:38, Greg Morgan a écrit :

PanierAvide,

That's very nice.  Your system takes 100 pounds of pain out of using 
Mapillary.  There seems to be a few missing items but I cannot put my 
finger on them.  The simplicity is Pic4Carto's best feature.


Regards,
Greg





--
PanierAvide
Géomaticien & développeur

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk