Re: [tcpdump-workers] compiler warnings on AIX and Solaris
--- Begin Message --- On Sat, 24 Jul 2021 10:55:19 -0700 Guy Harris wrote: [...] > If there's a way to force XL C to treat it as a hard error, we need > to update the AC_LBL_CHECK_UNKNOWN_WARNING_OPTION_ERROR autoconf > macro to set the compiler up to use it when testing whether compiler > options are supported. > > If there *isn't* a way to do that, the configure-script test also > needs to scan the standard error of the compilation and look for the > warning, and treat that as an indication of lack of support as well. > (I think the equivalent test provided as part of CMake may already do > that.) The current master branch produces a much cleaner output for "make -s" with XL C, thank you! -- Denis Ovsienko --- End Message --- ___ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
[tcpdump-workers] Fwd: Wrong bytes for DSA To_CPU code.
--- Begin Message --- I think the following page on the website has something wrong. It lists b17,b16 and b12 as the code field for the To_CPU frames. While in the `print_dsa.c` or the Linux kernel implementation, b18, b17 and b12 are used. https://www.tcpdump.org/linktypes/LINKTYPE_DSA_TAG_DSA.html Another question, I work in a team building verification tool for Ethernet designs. Is there a method to differentiate between the normal Ethernet frames and DSA-tagged one ? In other words, can a port multiplex between the two types ? or each port in a DSA device is known to utilize tagging or not ? -- *Regards* *Shady Atef .* -- *Regards* *Shady Atef .* --- End Message --- ___ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
