[tor-relays] FW: Relay Shirt

2016-12-12 Thread I






They are as good as their word.Robert-Original Message-From: tsh...@torproject.orgSent: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:32:37 -0800To: beatthebasta...@inbox.comSubject: Relay ShirtYour t-shirt has shipped! Tracking# LYt65rfhyy65US.You can track it here: https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction_input
Jon SelonTor Projectpgp: C4B6 4A1C 94FE 9CF5 210F  235D 5F7E 873D 81D5 E305








___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] Draft Fallback Directory List

2016-12-12 Thread teor

> On 13 Dec. 2016, at 08:25, teor  wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 13 Dec. 2016, at 08:13, Rejo Zenger  wrote:
>> 
>> Hey Tim,
>> 
>> My relay now should be available on both IPv4 and IPv6. But, to be honest, I 
>> don't see how I can verify the correct functioning of IPv6.  Here are the 
>> details:
>> 
>> namerejozenger
>> fingerprint AA0D167E03E298F9A8CD50F448B81FBD7FA80D56
>> ipv4 address94.142.242.84
>> ipv6 address2a02:898:24:84::1
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> Rejo Zenger
> 
> Hi Rejo,
> 
> Have you configured an IPv6 ORPort in your torrc?
> 
> ORPort [2a02:898:24:84::1]:9001
> 
> The directory authorities will verify your IPv6 connectivity.
> 
> Or you can use telnet (or nc):
> 
> telnet 2a02:898:24:84::1 9001
> 
> Or you can use a tor client version 0.2.8 or later:
> 
> tor ClientUseIPv4 0 UseMicrodescriptors 0 EntryGuards rejozenger
> 
> And then send some data through that client, or just read the logs
> to make sure it says its guard is up.
> 
> Tim

Hi Rejo,

I see you just changed the ports on your relay.
Please let me know if you are going to keep those ports.
And please let me know if you get IPv6 working.

Relays need to have the same address and ports for 7 days to become
fallback directory mirrors.

This means your relay won't be selected as a fallback directory mirror
when I rebuild the list on the weekend, but might be selected next time
someone rebuilds the list (in 6 to 12 months time).

Tim

>> ++ 12/12/16 21:39 +1100 - teor:
>>> 
 On 12 Dec. 2016, at 19:15, Rejo Zenger  wrote:
 
 Hey!
 
 I do have IPv6 available, but I hadn't taken the time to actually enable 
 it. I will look into it one of the next days and when enabled, I'll let 
 you know about the IPv6 address.
 
 Node: rejozenger, FP: AA0D167E03E298F9A8CD50F448B81FBD7FA80D56
 
 Kind regards,
 Rejo Zenger
>>> 
>>> Thanks, that would be great!
>>> 
>>> T
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
>>> 
>>> teor2345 at gmail dot com
>>> PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
>>> ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
>>> xmpp: teor at torproject dot org
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> tor-relays mailing list
>>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Rejo Zenger
>> E r...@zenger.nl | P +31(0)639642738 | W https://rejo.zenger.nl  T 
>> @rejozenger | J r...@zenger.nl
>> 
>> OpenPGP   1FBF 7B37 6537 68B1 2532  A4CB 0994 0946 21DB EFD4
>> XMPP OTR  271A 9186 AFBC 8124 18CF  4BE2 E000 E708 F811 5ACF
>> Signal82597 53935 59879 30955 36233 06160 [...]
>> ___
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
> T
> 
> -- 
> Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
> 
> teor2345 at gmail dot com
> PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
> ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
> xmpp: teor at torproject dot org
> 

T

-- 
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
xmpp: teor at torproject dot org




___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] Draft Fallback Directory List

2016-12-12 Thread teor

> On 13 Dec. 2016, at 08:13, Rejo Zenger  wrote:
> 
> Hey Tim,
> 
> My relay now should be available on both IPv4 and IPv6. But, to be honest, I 
> don't see how I can verify the correct functioning of IPv6.  Here are the 
> details:
> 
> namerejozenger
> fingerprint AA0D167E03E298F9A8CD50F448B81FBD7FA80D56
> ipv4 address94.142.242.84
> ipv6 address2a02:898:24:84::1
> 
> Kind regards,
> Rejo Zenger

Hi Rejo,

Have you configured an IPv6 ORPort in your torrc?

ORPort [2a02:898:24:84::1]:9001

The directory authorities will verify your IPv6 connectivity.

Or you can use telnet (or nc):

telnet 2a02:898:24:84::1 9001

Or you can use a tor client version 0.2.8 or later:

tor ClientUseIPv4 0 UseMicrodescriptors 0 EntryGuards rejozenger

And then send some data through that client, or just read the logs
to make sure it says its guard is up.

Tim

> ++ 12/12/16 21:39 +1100 - teor:
>> 
>>> On 12 Dec. 2016, at 19:15, Rejo Zenger  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hey!
>>> 
>>> I do have IPv6 available, but I hadn't taken the time to actually enable 
>>> it. I will look into it one of the next days and when enabled, I'll let you 
>>> know about the IPv6 address.
>>> 
>>> Node: rejozenger, FP: AA0D167E03E298F9A8CD50F448B81FBD7FA80D56
>>> 
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Rejo Zenger
>> 
>> Thanks, that would be great!
>> 
>> T
>> 
>> -- 
>> Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
>> 
>> teor2345 at gmail dot com
>> PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
>> ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
>> xmpp: teor at torproject dot org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
> 
> -- 
> Rejo Zenger
> E r...@zenger.nl | P +31(0)639642738 | W https://rejo.zenger.nl  T 
> @rejozenger | J r...@zenger.nl
> 
> OpenPGP   1FBF 7B37 6537 68B1 2532  A4CB 0994 0946 21DB EFD4
> XMPP OTR  271A 9186 AFBC 8124 18CF  4BE2 E000 E708 F811 5ACF
> Signal82597 53935 59879 30955 36233 06160 [...]
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

T

-- 
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
xmpp: teor at torproject dot org




___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] Draft Fallback Directory List

2016-12-12 Thread Rejo Zenger

Hey Tim,

My relay now should be available on both IPv4 and IPv6. But, to be 
honest, I don't see how I can verify the correct functioning of IPv6.  
Here are the details:


namerejozenger
fingerprint AA0D167E03E298F9A8CD50F448B81FBD7FA80D56
ipv4 address94.142.242.84
ipv6 address2a02:898:24:84::1

Kind regards,
Rejo Zenger



++ 12/12/16 21:39 +1100 - teor:



On 12 Dec. 2016, at 19:15, Rejo Zenger  wrote:

Hey!

I do have IPv6 available, but I hadn't taken the time to actually enable it. I 
will look into it one of the next days and when enabled, I'll let you know 
about the IPv6 address.

Node: rejozenger, FP: AA0D167E03E298F9A8CD50F448B81FBD7FA80D56

Kind regards,
Rejo Zenger


Thanks, that would be great!

T

--
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
xmpp: teor at torproject dot org




___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays



--
Rejo Zenger
E r...@zenger.nl | P +31(0)639642738 | W https://rejo.zenger.nl  
T @rejozenger | J r...@zenger.nl


OpenPGP   1FBF 7B37 6537 68B1 2532  A4CB 0994 0946 21DB EFD4
XMPP OTR  271A 9186 AFBC 8124 18CF  4BE2 E000 E708 F811 5ACF
Signal82597 53935 59879 30955 36233 06160 [...]


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] Does the "Advertised bandwidth" correlates with the "Consensus Weight"

2016-12-12 Thread teor

> On 13 Dec. 2016, at 03:28, Toralf Förster  wrote:
> ...
> 
> I do wonder if the measurement of the former is somehow affected by the later 
> ?
> 
> ...
> Toralf

Yes, the bandwidth authorities measure the bandwidth, then calculate
the ratio between the advertised and measured bandwidths. This becomes
the consensus weight (after averaging, and then taking the low-median
of votes).

Clients choose relays based on consensus weight, which then affects the
bandwidth they carry, which affects the observed bandwidth, which is
one of the factors that feeds into the measured bandwidth.

Part of the calculation process for the consensus weight makes sure
that this feedback converges, rather than diverging.

T

-- 
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
xmpp: teor at torproject dot org




___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


[tor-relays] Does the "Advertised bandwidth" correlates with the "Consensus Weight"

2016-12-12 Thread Toralf Förster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

I do wonder if the measurement of the former is somehow affected by the later ?

- -- 
Toralf
PGP: C4EACDDE 0076E94E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iHYEAREIAB4FAlhO0D0XHHRvcmFsZi5mb2Vyc3RlckBnbXguZGUACgkQxOrN3gB2
6U497gD/erm0jlydeZEl918z0Hgd15N7iLAXvvzBpIc+V76H+qgA/1jhNdamzz25
EV1UWC1ynuVhL9rSBPak0z630q1CqWu1
=wa2A
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] Draft Fallback Directory List

2016-12-12 Thread teor

> On 12 Dec. 2016, at 19:15, Rejo Zenger  wrote:
> 
> Hey!
> 
> I do have IPv6 available, but I hadn't taken the time to actually enable it. 
> I will look into it one of the next days and when enabled, I'll let you know 
> about the IPv6 address.
> 
> Node: rejozenger, FP: AA0D167E03E298F9A8CD50F448B81FBD7FA80D56
> 
> Kind regards,
> Rejo Zenger

Thanks, that would be great!

T

-- 
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
xmpp: teor at torproject dot org




___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] All I want for Chrismas is a bloody t-shirt

2016-12-12 Thread Petrusko
Yeah! Tshirt tshirt tshirt !!!

Christmas time ?? :p


 12/12/2016  02:36, I :
> What about simplifying that to one automated congratulation message
> with the request for the size and address in the answer? 

-- 
Petrusko
EBE23AE5




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] Draft Fallback Directory List

2016-12-12 Thread Rejo Zenger

Hey!

I do have IPv6 available, but I hadn't taken the time to actually enable 
it. I will look into it one of the next days and when enabled, I'll let 
you know about the IPv6 address.


Node: rejozenger, FP: AA0D167E03E298F9A8CD50F448B81FBD7FA80D56

Kind regards,
Rejo Zenger


++ 12/12/16 08:49 +1100 - teor:



On 12 Dec. 2016, at 05:08, Andrew Deason  wrote:

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 23:45:42 +1100
teor  wrote:


One or more of your relays have been selected as fallback directory
mirrors[0] for the next tor release. Please keep the relay available on
the same addresses, ports, and identity key (fingerprint) for the next
2 years.


Does ipv6 connectivity matter at all for the purposes of being a
fallback directory mirror? I can see of course it's not required, but
I'm not sure if an ipv6 address would be used at all (as a directory
mirror). That is, if I added a v6 addr to a relay in that list, would
that help anything, or not yet?


It helps clients configured to use dual-stack IPv6:
ClientPreferIPv6ORPort 1

And clients configured to use IPv6 only:
ClientUseIPv4 0
UseMicrodescriptors 0

But as they are manual configs, not many clients use them yet.
We want to make dual-stack easier (even automatic) on clients, but we
need more IPv6 relays to preserve client privacy.


I assume that adding a v6 address does not violate the "keep the same
address/port/key for the next 2 years" requirement. Is that correct?


Yes, but you need to keep *both* addresses for 2 years after you add
IPv6. Let me know, and I'll add the IPv6 address to the fallback list.

T

--
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
xmpp: teor at torproject dot org




___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays



--
Rejo Zenger
E r...@zenger.nl | P +31(0)639642738 | W https://rejo.zenger.nl  
T @rejozenger | J r...@zenger.nl


OpenPGP   1FBF 7B37 6537 68B1 2532  A4CB 0994 0946 21DB EFD4
XMPP OTR  271A 9186 AFBC 8124 18CF  4BE2 E000 E708 F811 5ACF
Signal82597 53935 59879 30955 36233 06160 [...]


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays