Re: [tor-talk] Aurora only build

2012-01-27 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:13:41 -0700
AK  wrote:

> Actually, the Tor Browser bundle is built from Firefox Portable
> binaries.

It's built from source.

-- 
Andrew
http://tpo.is/contact
pgp 0x74ED336B
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


Re: [tor-talk] Aurora only build

2012-01-27 Thread Robert Ransom
On 2012-01-27, AK  wrote:
> Actually, the Tor Browser bundle is built from Firefox Portable binaries.
>
> From README.dev:
>> Using build-scripts/Makefile it is possible to create a working USB
>> Tor bundle. It's limitations include:
>>  - It uses the FirefoxPortable binaries

README.dev has not been updated since it was split out of the README
file in April 2009.  That statement is no longer true.


Robert Ransom
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


Re: [tor-talk] Aurora only build

2012-01-27 Thread AK
Actually, the Tor Browser bundle is built from Firefox Portable binaries.

>From README.dev:
> Using build-scripts/Makefile it is possible to create a working USB
> Tor bundle. It's limitations include:
>  - It uses the FirefoxPortable binaries

However, they do say you can build a custom version of Firefox from source
and I guess you can use a similar build procedure to apply those patches in
src/current-patches to the firefox c++ files. It's still pretty unclear,
but I am testing it out, and I'll let you know how it turns out.

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote:

> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:16:05 -0700
> AK  wrote:
>
> > So are you telling me that standard Firefox depends on closed source
> > binaries as well? I don't care about how free the license is. I'm
> > talking about whether it can be built completely from source code.
>
> I suggest starting with the source,
> https://gitweb.torproject.org/torbrowser.git.  We build tor browser
> bundle from source code, so can you.  In fact, we encourage people to
> build their own.
>
> --
> Andrew
> http://tpo.is/contact
> pgp 0x74ED336B
> ___
> tor-talk mailing list
> tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


Re: [tor-talk] Aurora only build

2012-01-27 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:16:05 -0700
AK  wrote:

> So are you telling me that standard Firefox depends on closed source
> binaries as well? I don't care about how free the license is. I'm
> talking about whether it can be built completely from source code.

I suggest starting with the source,
https://gitweb.torproject.org/torbrowser.git.  We build tor browser
bundle from source code, so can you.  In fact, we encourage people to
build their own.

-- 
Andrew
http://tpo.is/contact
pgp 0x74ED336B
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


Re: [tor-talk] Aurora only build

2012-01-27 Thread AK
So are you telling me that standard Firefox depends on closed source
binaries as well? I don't care about how free the license is. I'm talking
about whether it can be built completely from source code.

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Koh Choon Lin <2choon...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 1:04 AM, AK  wrote:
> > As far as I know, Aurora is based on something called "Firefox Portable".
> > Last time I checked, this thing isn't even open source. Can someone
> clarify
> > this? Or should I open a new thread?
>
> Aurora is a brand-less version of Firefox. It is considered to be more
> free than the Firefox binaries from Mozilla and is tri-licensed too.
> Portable app is a method of modifying a product (Firefox) into one
> which does not leave any trace on the running PC.
>
>
>
> --
> Regards
> Koh Choon Lin
> ___
> tor-talk mailing list
> tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


Re: [tor-talk] Aurora only build

2012-01-27 Thread Koh Choon Lin
Hi

On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 1:04 AM, AK  wrote:
> As far as I know, Aurora is based on something called "Firefox Portable".
> Last time I checked, this thing isn't even open source. Can someone clarify
> this? Or should I open a new thread?

Aurora is a brand-less version of Firefox. It is considered to be more
free than the Firefox binaries from Mozilla and is tri-licensed too.
Portable app is a method of modifying a product (Firefox) into one
which does not leave any trace on the running PC.



-- 
Regards
Koh Choon Lin
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


Re: [tor-talk] Aurora only build

2012-01-27 Thread AK
As far as I know, Aurora is based on something called "Firefox Portable".
Last time I checked, this thing isn't even open source. Can someone clarify
this? Or should I open a new thread?

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Geoff Down  wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012, at 09:50 AM, Marco Bonetti wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > >  though perhaps it would not provide as strong anonymity as Aurora -
> any views?
> > Errr... I think you missed a point ;-)
> > Aurora IS Firefox or, at least, it's the release name.
> > When building custom version of Mozilla products from source you can't
> > use the same name as the official packages. That's the TL;DR of the
> > Mozilla Public Policy.
> > TBB is a custom version of Mozilla Firefox built by the Tor Project and
> > shipped together with Vidalia and some other programs and libraries.
> > So, if you want to have something which looks like TBB on a PowerPC Mac,
> > install Vidalia, grab a copy of TenFourFox and install required
> > extensions.
> >
> > Beware this is not enough!
> >
> > TBB has been built to address a specific threat model and Firefox has
> > been patched and configured accordingly to that model so I'm the first to
> > warn you that "just run Firefox with required extensions" is close enough
> > but not the same thing.
> >
>  No, that was my point - TenFourFox does not have the patches that the
>  TBB Firefox has, so even with the same extensions it will not be as
>  secure.
> GD
>
> --
> http://www.fastmail.fm - A fast, anti-spam email service.
>
> ___
> tor-talk mailing list
> tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


Re: [tor-talk] Aurora only build

2012-01-27 Thread Geoff Down


On Fri, Jan 27, 2012, at 09:50 AM, Marco Bonetti wrote:
> - Original Message -
> >  though perhaps it would not provide as strong anonymity as Aurora - any 
> > views?
> Errr... I think you missed a point ;-)
> Aurora IS Firefox or, at least, it's the release name.
> When building custom version of Mozilla products from source you can't
> use the same name as the official packages. That's the TL;DR of the
> Mozilla Public Policy.
> TBB is a custom version of Mozilla Firefox built by the Tor Project and
> shipped together with Vidalia and some other programs and libraries.
> So, if you want to have something which looks like TBB on a PowerPC Mac,
> install Vidalia, grab a copy of TenFourFox and install required
> extensions.
> 
> Beware this is not enough!
> 
> TBB has been built to address a specific threat model and Firefox has
> been patched and configured accordingly to that model so I'm the first to
> warn you that "just run Firefox with required extensions" is close enough
> but not the same thing.
> 
 No, that was my point - TenFourFox does not have the patches that the
 TBB Firefox has, so even with the same extensions it will not be as
 secure.
GD

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - A fast, anti-spam email service.

___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


Re: [tor-talk] Aurora only build

2012-01-27 Thread Marco Bonetti
- Original Message -
>  though perhaps it would not provide as strong anonymity as Aurora - any 
> views?
Errr... I think you missed a point ;-)
Aurora IS Firefox or, at least, it's the release name.
When building custom version of Mozilla products from source you can't use the 
same name as the official packages. That's the TL;DR of the Mozilla Public 
Policy.
TBB is a custom version of Mozilla Firefox built by the Tor Project and shipped 
together with Vidalia and some other programs and libraries.
So, if you want to have something which looks like TBB on a PowerPC Mac, 
install Vidalia, grab a copy of TenFourFox and install required extensions.

Beware this is not enough!

TBB has been built to address a specific threat model and Firefox has been 
patched and configured accordingly to that model so I'm the first to warn you 
that "just run Firefox with required extensions" is close enough but not the 
same thing.

Ciao!

-- 
Marco Bonetti
Tor research and other stuff: http://sid77.slackware.it/
Slackintosh Linux Project Developer: http://workaround.ch/
Linux-live for powerpc: http://workaround.ch/pub/rsync/mb/linux-live/

My GnuPG key id: 0x0B60BC5F
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


Re: [tor-talk] Aurora only build

2012-01-26 Thread Geoff Down


On Thu, Jan 26, 2012, at 03:54 PM, Marco Bonetti wrote:
> - Original Message -
> >  TBB isn't available for OSX PPC, so I'd have to build it - a mammoth
> >  task, but since I already have the latest Tor running and a working
> >  Vidalia, building Aurora would be a sensible step if possible, to
> >  get away from my outdated browser.
> Mozilla moved away from the PPC platform around version 5.x and the code
> base has grown incompatible since then. You should take a look at
> http://www.floodgap.com/software/tenfourfox/ if you need something which
> looks like recent Firefox versions without all the hassle of building it
> up yourself.
> 
 Hi Marco,
 that's certainly a worthwhile project, and it even supports addons so I
 imagine Torbutton would install, though perhaps it would not provide as
 strong anonymity as Aurora - any views?
GD

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - The way an email service should be

___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


Re: [tor-talk] Aurora only build

2012-01-26 Thread Marco Bonetti
- Original Message -
>  TBB isn't available for OSX PPC, so I'd have to build it - a mammoth
>  task, but since I already have the latest Tor running and a working
>  Vidalia, building Aurora would be a sensible step if possible, to
>  get away from my outdated browser.
Mozilla moved away from the PPC platform around version 5.x and the code base 
has grown incompatible since then. You should take a look at 
http://www.floodgap.com/software/tenfourfox/ if you need something which looks 
like recent Firefox versions without all the hassle of building it up yourself.

HTH,
Marco

-- 
Marco Bonetti
Tor research and other stuff: http://sid77.slackware.it/
Slackintosh Linux Project Developer: http://workaround.ch/
Linux-live for powerpc: http://workaround.ch/pub/rsync/mb/linux-live/

My GnuPG key id: 0x0B60BC5F
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


Re: [tor-talk] Aurora only build

2012-01-26 Thread Geoff Down


On Thu, Jan 26, 2012, at 12:26 PM, cgp 3cg wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >  is it possible to build just the Aurora/Torbutton part of
> >  TorBrowserBundle?
> > If so, is it likely to be remotely possible on OSX 10.4?
> 
> Not sure about OSX, but under Linux you can edit the
> 'start-tor-browser' script and change the line:
> 
> ./App/vidalia --datadir Data/Vidalia/
> 
> to be:
> 
> ./App/Firefox/firefox -profile ./Data/profile
> 
> This just starts Aurora. Obviously you will need a running Tor
> instance for it to connect to.
> 
> -C
 TBB isn't available for OSX PPC, so I'd have to build it - a mammoth
 task, but since I already have the latest Tor running and a working
 Vidalia, building Aurora would be a sensible step if possible, to get
 away from my outdated browser.
GD

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Access your email from home and the web

___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


Re: [tor-talk] Aurora only build

2012-01-25 Thread cgp 3cg
> Hi list,
>  is it possible to build just the Aurora/Torbutton part of
>  TorBrowserBundle?
> If so, is it likely to be remotely possible on OSX 10.4?

Not sure about OSX, but under Linux you can edit the
'start-tor-browser' script and change the line:

./App/vidalia --datadir Data/Vidalia/

to be:

./App/Firefox/firefox -profile ./Data/profile

This just starts Aurora. Obviously you will need a running Tor
instance for it to connect to.

-C
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk