[Bug 2070090] [NEW] dvbstreamer ftbfs with cdbs & dpkg
Public bug reported: dvbstreamer fails to build. Notably the package uses cdbs which is less common now but still used by a significant number of packages. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dvbstreamer/2.1.0-5.7 checking for gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler works... no configure: error: in `/<>': configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details ** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Confirmed ** Affects: dvbstreamer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: ftbfs oracular update-excuse ** Tags added: update-excuse ** Also affects: dvbstreamer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070090 Title: dvbstreamer ftbfs with cdbs & dpkg To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/2070090/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069210] Re: krita fails to build with jpeg-xl 0.9
** Changed in: krita (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069210 Title: krita fails to build with jpeg-xl 0.9 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krita/+bug/2069210/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2070025] Re: [MIR] wsdd
** Description changed: [Availability] The package wsdd is already in Ubuntu universe. The package wsdd build for the architectures it is designed to work on. It currently builds and works for architectures: amd64 as a python arch-all package Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsdd [Rationale] - The package wsdd is required in Ubuntu main for enabling win10 shares discovery in nautilus. - The package wsdd will generally be useful for a large part of our user base - There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or - should go universe->main instead of this. - - The binary package wssd needs to be in main to achieve shares enumeration in gvfs/nautilus. We don't plan to install wssd-server which will stay in universe. + should go universe->main instead of this. + - The binary package wssd needs to be in main to achieve shares enumeration in gvfs/nautilus. We don't plan to install wsdd-server which will stay in universe. - The package wsdd is required in Ubuntu main no later than August 15th due to Oracular feature freeze. [Security] - No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries - no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` - Package does install an user service which is going to be started by the corresponding gvfs backend - Package does not install services, timers or recurring jobs - Packages does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). - Package does not expose any external endpoints - Packages does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software [Quality assurance - function/usage] - The package works well right after install [Quality assurance - maintenance] - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does - only has a wishlist request open in Debian and minor bugs upstream - - Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsdd/+bug - - Debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=wsdd - - Upstream's bug tracker, https://github.com/christgau/wsdd/issues + only has a wishlist request open in Debian and minor bugs upstream + - Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsdd/+bug + - Debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=wsdd + - Upstream's bug tracker, https://github.com/christgau/wsdd/issues - The package has no important open bugs - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support [Quality assurance - testing] - TOFIX: we need to enable the upstream tests as part of the package build - TODO-A: - The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails - TODO-A: it makes the build fail, link to build log TBD - TODO-B: - The package does not run a test at build time because TBD + - The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails + it makes the build fail, link to build log + 1ubuntu1 TOFIX: we need to enable some autopkgtests TODO-A: - The package runs an autopkgtest, and is currently passing on TODO-A: this TBD list of architectures, link to test logs TBD TODO-B: - The package does not run an autopkgtest because TBD TODO-A: - The package does have not failing autopkgtests right now TODO-B: - The package does have failing autopkgtests tests right now, but since TODO-B: they always failed they are handled as "ignored failure", this is TODO-B: ok because TBD [Quality assurance - packaging] TOFIX: write a debian/watch for the package TODO-A: - debian/watch is present and works TODO-B: - debian/watch is not present, instead it has TBD TODO-C: - debian/watch is not present because it is a native package - debian/control has a valid Maintainer definition - This package only has minor lintian warnings # lintian --pedantic wsdd_0.8-1_amd64.changes W: wsdd: groff-message troff::145: error: character '*' is not allowed as a starting delimiter [usr/share/man/man1/wsdd.1.gz:1] W: wsdd: groff-message troff::145: error: character '*' is not allowed as a starting delimiter [usr/share/man/man1/wsdd.1.gz:2] P: wsdd source: package-uses-old-debhelper-compat-version 11 P: wsdd source: trailing-whitespace [debian/control:55] P: wsdd source: trailing-whitespace [debian/control:5] P: wsdd source: trailing-whitespace [debian/rules:31] P: wsdd source: uses-debhelper-compat-file [debian/compat] - Lintian overrides are not present - This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted packages. - This package has no python2 or GTK2 dependencies - The package will be installed by default, but does not ask debconf questions - Packaging and build is easy, https://salsa.debian.org/grantma/wsdd/-/blob/master/debian/rules - [UI standards] - Application is not end-user facing (does not need translation) [Dependencies] - No further depends or recommends dependencies that are not yet in main [Standards compliance] - This package correctly follows FHS
[Bug 2070057] Re: Enable the upstream tests as part of the package build
Allesandro, I have uploaded this for you with the following changes: - I adjusted the version number to 2:0.8-1ubuntu1 - I included LP: #2070025 in debian/changelog to automatically close this bug when the package migrates from oracular-proposed to oracular - I ran `update-maintainer` from ubuntu-dev-tools to update the Maintainer field in debian/control for a Ubuntu-specific upload - I added the Forwarded field to the patch as a basic implementation of https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep3/ Could you follow up by proposing your work here to the Debian maintainer? Thank you for helping to make Ubuntu better. ** Changed in: wsdd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070057 Title: Enable the upstream tests as part of the package build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsdd/+bug/2070057/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2070057] Re: Enable the upstream tests as part of the package build
I have unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors. Feel free to resubscribe if you have something else that needs to be sponsored. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070057 Title: Enable the upstream tests as part of the package build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsdd/+bug/2070057/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069962] Re: Stop using libsoup-gnome-2.4-1
** Changed in: unity-scope-video-remote (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: unity-scope-video-remote (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Also affects: unity-lens-photos (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: unity-lens-photos (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: unity-lens-photos (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Description changed: The only packages in Ubuntu using libsoup-gnome-2.4-1 are - unity-china-video-scope - unity-scope-home - unity-scope-video-remote + - unity-lens-photos Please switch to the libsoup3 API. There is some documentation and many examples at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libsoup/-/issues/218 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069962 Title: Stop using libsoup-gnome-2.4-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-china-video-scope/+bug/2069962/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2014587] Re: libgdata-common is required by libgdata22 but is empty.
Ubuntu uses language packs. The language pack process strips translations out of the .deb packages so that they can be provided by the language packs instead. In some cases, the translations are the only things in a package and the package therefore appears to be empty. However, it is not worth diverging from Debian to remove these packages only on Ubuntu. Therefore, this is expected behavior and there is nothing that needs to be fixed here. ** Changed in: libgdata (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: libgdata (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2014587 Title: libgdata-common is required by libgdata22 but is empty. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgdata/+bug/2014587/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2052537] Re: astroidmail needs to stop using webkit2gtk 4.0
** Changed in: astroidmail (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052537 Title: astroidmail needs to stop using webkit2gtk 4.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/astroidmail/+bug/2052537/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069962] [NEW] Stop using libsoup-gnome-2.4-1
Public bug reported: The only packages in Ubuntu using libsoup-gnome-2.4-1 are - unity-china-video-scope - unity-scope-home - unity-scope-video-remote Please switch to the libsoup3 API. There is some documentation and many examples at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libsoup/-/issues/218 ** Affects: unity-china-video-scope (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Affects: unity-scope-home (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Affects: unity-scope-video-remote (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: oracular ** Also affects: unity-china-video-scope (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: unity-china-video-scope (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: unity-china-video-scope (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Also affects: unity-scope-video-remote (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags added: oracular -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069962 Title: Stop using libsoup-gnome-2.4-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-china-video-scope/+bug/2069962/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069308] Re: MIR xdg-terminal-exec
I don't know why but xdg-utils upstream does not install the xdg- terminal script. It is also not listed in the list of tools provided by xdg-utils in the README.md at https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xdg/xdg- utils For reference, Fedora does not go out of its way to install xdg-terminal either: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=37977002 glib2.0 does have explicit support for xdg-terminal-exec and Ubuntu Desktop wants to proceed with using xdg-terminal-exec rather than the older xdg-terminal. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/blob/glib-2-80/gio/gdesktopappinfo.c#L2695 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069308 Title: MIR xdg-terminal-exec To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-terminal-exec/+bug/2069308/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066262] Re: [MIR] libdex
Thank for your review. I believe the latest version of libdex (0.6.1) is present in Ubuntu Oracular. Perhaps you were looking at Ubuntu 24.04 LTS? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066262 Title: [MIR] libdex To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdex/+bug/2066262/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069308] Re: MIR xdg-terminal-exec
** Description changed: [Availability] The package xdg-terminal-exec is already in Ubuntu universe. The package xdg-terminal-exec build for the architectures it is designed to work on. - It currently builds and works for architectures: all + It currently builds and works for architectures: "all" Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-terminal-exec [Rationale] - The package xdg-terminal-exec is required in Ubuntu main for compliance with the emerging XDG specification, https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/terminal-wg/specifications/-/merge_requests/3. - The package xdg-terminal-exec will generally be useful for a large part of our user base - Package xdg-terminal-exec covers the same use case as x-terminal-emulator, but is better because it allows setting the default terminal for a particular user (instead of system-wide), and xdg-terminal-exec ought to be configured to be the terminal used for .desktop files that set Terminal=true too, thereby we want to replace it. - There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or should go universe->main instead of this. - The binary package xdg-terminal-exec needs to be in main to ensure full and committed support for such a central piece for the Ubuntu desktop - It would be great and useful to community/processes to have the package xdg-terminal-exec in Ubuntu main, but there is no definitive deadline. [Security] - No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past - No `suid` or `sgid` binaries - No executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` - Package does not install services, timers or recurring jobs - Packages does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). - Package does not expose any external endpoints - Packages does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software (filters, scanners, plugins, UI skins, ...) [Quality assurance - function/usage] - The package works well right after install [Quality assurance - maintenance] - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does not have too many, long-term & critical, open bugs - Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-terminal-exec/+bug - Debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=xdg-terminal-exec - Upstream's bug tracker, e.g., GitHub Issues https://github.com/Vladimir-csp/xdg-terminal-exec/issues - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support [Quality assurance - testing] - The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails it makes the build fail, link to build log[1]. - The package runs an autopkgtest, and is currently passing on - x64, link to test logs[2] + all Ubuntu architectures, link to test logs[2] - The package does have not failing autopkgtests right now [Quality assurance - packaging] - debian/watch is present and works - debian/control defines a correct Maintainer field - This package does not yield massive lintian Warnings, Errors Please link to a recent build log of the package[1] - Please attach the full output you have got from `lintian --pedantic` as an extra post to this bug. - Lintian overrides are not present - This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted packages. - This package has no python2 or GTK2 dependencies - The package will be installed by default, but does not ask debconf questions higher than medium - Packaging and build is easy, link to debian/rules[3] [UI standards] - Application is not end-user facing (does not need translation) - End-user applications without desktop file, not needed because not a desktop application. [Dependencies] - No further depends or recommends dependencies that are not yet in main [Standards compliance] - This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy [Maintenance/Owner] - I suggest the owning team to be the desktop team - The future owning team is not yet subscribed, but will subscribe to the package before promotion - This does not use static builds - This does not use vendored code - This package is not rust based - The package was rebuilt in Launchpad recently[1]. [Background information] The Package description explains the package well Upstream Name is xdg-terminal-exec Link to upstream project https://github.com/Vladimir-csp/xdg-terminal-exec [1] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/734808252/buildlog_ubuntu-oracular-amd64.xdg-terminal-exec_0.10.0-1_BUILDING.txt.gz [2] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/xdg-terminal-exec [3] https://salsa.debian.org/freedesktop-team/xdg-terminal-exec/-/raw/debian/master/debian/rules?ref_type=heads ** Description changed: [Availability] The package xdg-terminal-exec is already in Ubuntu universe. The package xdg-terminal-exec build for the architectures it is designed to work on. It
[Bug 2068598] Re: Mutter release 46.2
** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Also affects: mutter (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068598 Title: Mutter release 46.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2068598/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069210] [NEW] krita fails to build with jpeg-xl 0.9
Public bug reported: See the attached Debian bug. My initial attempt to fix this was unsuccessful. ** Affects: krita (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Affects: krita (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Tags: ftbfs oracular update-excuse ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1073077 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073077 ** Also affects: krita (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073077 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069210 Title: krita fails to build with jpeg-xl 0.9 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krita/+bug/2069210/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068774] Re: magic-wormhole FTBFS with Python 3.12
I helped out here by filing the Debian bug for you. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1073069 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073069 ** Also affects: magic-wormhole (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073069 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: magic-wormhole (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068774 Title: magic-wormhole FTBFS with Python 3.12 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/magic-wormhole/+bug/2068774/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069028] Re: Package current upstream (v2024.02.1)
I have uploaded this for you and unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors. Please feel to resubscribe ubuntu-sponsors if you have something else that needs to be sponsored. ** Changed in: hart-software-services (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069028 Title: Package current upstream (v2024.02.1) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hart-software-services/+bug/2069028/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069139] Re: Sync routes 2.5.1-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
** Changed in: routes (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069139 Title: Sync routes 2.5.1-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/routes/+bug/2069139/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060241] Re: prosposed migration audit 1:3.1.2-2.1build1 vs network-manager 1.46.0-1ubuntu1
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: audit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060241 Title: prosposed migration audit 1:3.1.2-2.1build1 vs network-manager 1.46.0-1ubuntu1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/audit/+bug/2060241/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2011582] Re: google-perftools fails to build on i386
** Description changed: google-perftools fails to build on i386 + https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/google-perftools/2.9.1-0ubuntu3 + jpeg-xl's tcmalloc feature wants google-perftools. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2011582 Title: google-perftools fails to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/google-perftools/+bug/2011582/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065669] Re: Update osinfo-db to 0.20240510
** Changed in: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Summary changed:
- Update osinfo-db to 0.20240510
+ Update osinfo-db to 0.20240523
** Description changed:
Impact
==
The purpose of osinfo-db is to provide a database of guest operating systems
for use by virtualization provisioning tools using the libosinfo library. The
two primary users are the GNOME Boxes and Virt Manager apps.
- This SRU updates the database to the latest release.
+ This SRU updates the database to the latest release including OS updates
+ for the first half of 2024 including the release of Ubuntu 24.04 LTS and
+ the end of life of Ubuntu 22.10.
- It also includes patches to
- - Update Ubuntu 24.04 LTS for the stable release
- - EOL changes for Ubuntu 23.04
- - Add Ubuntu 24.10 as prerelease so that 24.10 ISOs are recognized (although
it won't be suggested for download by GNOME Boxes)
+ It also includes a patch to add Ubuntu 24.10 as prerelease so that 24.10
+ ISOs are recognized (although it won't be suggested for download by
+ GNOME Boxes)
Test Case 0
===
osinfo-db has an extensive test suite to validate the data files. If the test
suite fails, it will fail the build. These tests are also run as autopkgtests.
Ensure the build succeeds and the autopkgtest passes
Test Case 1
===
1. Install the update
2. Open a terminal and run
sudo apt install gnome-boxes
3. Run gnome-boxes
4. Click + then press "Download an operating system" (The UI varies depending
on the version of gnome-boxes).
5. Select Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x86_64 (Live)
6. The ISO will download to your Downloads folder
7. When it completes, the wizard will prompt you to create a Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
virtual machine.
Complete the wizard.
8. The virtual machine should start. Finish installing Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
inside. Afterwards, restart and log into the Ubuntu 24.04 LTS virtual machine.
9. Open a terminal and run this command: cat /etc/os-release to verify that
you are using Ubuntu 24.04 LTS.
10. Afterwards, you can power off the virtual machine.
Test Case 2
===
From a terminal, run
osinfo-query os vendor="Canonical Ltd"
- Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, Ubuntu 22.10, Ubuntu 23.04, and Ubuntu 23.10 should be
- included in the list.
+ Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, Ubuntu 23.10, Ubuntu 24.04 LTS, and Ubuntu 24.10
+ should be included in the list.
Where problems could occur
==
It is always possible to use ISOs not recognized by osinfo-db with either
GNOME Boxes or Virt Manager. osinfo-db provides useful metadata like
recommended RAM, recommended hard disk size, and what virtualized hardware
interfaces are supported.
This update significantly improves the ability of those apps to
recognize distros released in the first half of 2024, while also
updating some metadata details for older releases.
The most likely possible problem is that some download links may no
longer work. However, we know that the Ubuntu 23.04 download links were
broken before this update and 24.04 LTS was marked as pre-release so in
general download links will be better with this update.
Other Info
==
I am not preparing an SRU for Ubuntu 23.10 because it will be End of Life
soon and we encourage its users to switch to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. I expect that by
the time this SRU reaches jammy-updates that meta-release will be updated to
point to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. Therefore, anyone who gets this update on Ubuntu
22.04 LTS ("Jammy") will be prompted to upgrade to 24.04 LTS not 23.10 and
24.04 LTS will have a newer version than 22.04 LTS.
Even if that doesn't happen, this is a data package, not a security-
sensitive package.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065669
Title:
Update osinfo-db to 0.20240523
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/osinfo-db/+bug/2065669/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068647] [NEW] Don't update gedit to 47.0
Public bug reported: gedit 47.0 intentionally breaks all translations. Therefore, it is better for our users to avoid upgrading to that version. ** Affects: gedit Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: gedit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Triaged ** Affects: gedit-plugins (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: gedit (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Tags: upgrade-software-version version-skip-47.0 version-skip-47.1 ** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gedit/-/issues #593 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gedit/-/issues/593 ** Also affects: gedit via https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gedit/-/issues/593 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1072540 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072540 ** Also affects: gedit (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072540 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Also affects: gedit-plugins (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags added: version-skip-47.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068647 Title: Don't update gedit to 47.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gedit/+bug/2068647/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1735002] Re: Allow configuring Wi-Fi MAC Randomization feature from GUI
It's possible to disable this feature for individual networks now. Just click Settings for the wifi network and choose a different option in Identify > Cloned Address ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735002 Title: Allow configuring Wi-Fi MAC Randomization feature from GUI To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1735002/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2046354] Re: liblouisdmt tests are failing with the new liblouis
The liblouisutdml packaging has been fixed https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/liblouisutdml ** Changed in: liblouis (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046354 Title: liblouisdmt tests are failing with the new liblouis To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/liblouis/+bug/2046354/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2045940] Re: git-filter-repo fails to build from source due to git 2.4 help changes
** Changed in: git-filter-repo (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: git (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045940 Title: git-filter-repo fails to build from source due to git 2.4 help changes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/git/+bug/2045940/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067979] Re: Language selection is skipped for new installations
I have created the ubuntu/noble branch now. It is intentional that the location permission dialog is not shown currently for Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. There is some background in gnome- control-center LP: #2062178 . We decided not to disable location services in gnome-control-center for now but we also didn't want to advertise the location services feature so prominently in gnome-initial- setup at this time either. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067979 Title: Language selection is skipped for new installations To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/2067979/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068243] Re: Switch keyboard layout viewer to tecla
** Attachment added: "gkbd-azerty-dark.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2068243/+attachment/5786334/+files/gkbd-azerty-dark.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068243 Title: Switch keyboard layout viewer to tecla To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2068243/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068243] Re: Switch keyboard layout viewer to tecla
** Attachment added: "gkbd-azerty-light.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2068243/+attachment/5786335/+files/gkbd-azerty-light.png ** Description changed: Impact == GNOME 45 switched their default keyboard layout viewer from libgnomekbd to tecla. This change was made in gnome-control-center but Debian and Ubuntu carried a patch to revert this for gnome-shell because gnome-shell wasn't calling tecla correctly which made the keyboard layout viewer not work correctly for some keyboard layouts. The gnome-shell bug was fixed in 46.2. Tecla has these advantages compared to libgnomekbd: - Uses GTK4 and libadwaita - - Which means support for the dark style preference - - Much more modern looking window dialog + - Which means improved support for the dark style preference (Ubuntu enables dark style in many more places than GNOME normally does so the libgnomekbd viewer has partial dark style support in Ubuntu.) + - Much more modern looking window - Consistency with the existing ⋮ > View Keyboard Layout in GNOME Settings > Keyboard - Does what every other GNOME 45 or GNOME 46 distro does Therefore, this SRU drops the revert patch, drops Recommends: gkbd- capplet and adds Depends: tecla. apt should mark gkbd-capplet for autoremoval since nothing in the default Ubuntu Desktop Depends or Recommends it any more. It is harmless if either gkbd-capplet is uninstalled or kept installed. gnome-control-center already has Depends: tecla so this is not installing anything new. Test Case = From a terminal, run sudo apt install language-pack-gnome-fr Install the gnome-shell update. Log out and log back in. Open the GNOME Settings app (gnome-control-center). In the left sidebar, click Keyboard. Click Add Input Source… In the dialog, choose French (France), then choose French (AZERTY) then Add. In the right side of GNOME Shell's top bar, the keyboard layout switcher should be visible with en. Click en then change the keyboard layout to French (AZERTY). Click Show Keyboard Layout. A popup should show a keyboard layout with the second row of characters beginning with a z e r t y as shown in the tecla-azerty-light.png or tecla-azerty-dark.png screenshots. Close the keyboard layout popup. Switch the keyboard layout back to en Click Show Keyboard Layout The popup should display with the keyboard layout set to your usual English keyboard layout. What Could Go Wrong === This is a fairly minor feature and should not be essential to anyone who needs alternate keyboard layouts. I would guess people would be more likely to click the ⋮ > View Keyboard Layout option in GNOME Settings > Keyboard when choosing input sources rather than via GNOME Shell. And GNOME Settings was already set to use Tecla. This change does not affect actual usability of alternate keyboard layouts, just the single button to view the layout. Other Info == This change means that libgnomekbd will be demoted from main to universe for Ubuntu 24.10. For technical reasons, that demotion is not possible for already released stable versions of Ubuntu like Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. ** Also affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Description changed: Impact == GNOME 45 switched their default keyboard layout viewer from libgnomekbd to tecla. This change was made in gnome-control-center but Debian and Ubuntu carried a patch to revert this for gnome-shell because gnome-shell wasn't calling tecla correctly which made the keyboard layout viewer not work correctly for some keyboard layouts. The gnome-shell bug was fixed in 46.2. Tecla has these advantages compared to libgnomekbd: - Uses GTK4 and libadwaita - Which means improved support for the dark style preference (Ubuntu enables dark style in many more places than GNOME normally does so the libgnomekbd viewer has partial dark style support in Ubuntu.) - Much more modern looking window - Consistency with the existing ⋮ > View Keyboard Layout in GNOME Settings > Keyboard - Does what every other GNOME 45 or GNOME 46 distro does + (Screenshots attached to show differences) Therefore, this SRU drops the revert patch, drops Recommends: gkbd- capplet and adds Depends: tecla. apt should mark gkbd-capplet for autoremoval since nothing in the default Ubuntu Desktop Depends or Recommends it any more. It is harmless if either gkbd-capplet is uninstalled or kept installed. gnome-control-center already has Depends: tecla so this is not installing anything new. Test Case = From a terminal, run sudo apt install language-pack-gnome-fr Install the gnome-shell update. Log out and log back in. Open the
[Bug 2068243] [NEW] Switch keyboard layout viewer to tecla
Public bug reported: Impact == GNOME 45 switched their default keyboard layout viewer from libgnomekbd to tecla. This change was made in gnome-control-center but Debian and Ubuntu carried a patch to revert this for gnome-shell because gnome-shell wasn't calling tecla correctly which made the keyboard layout viewer not work correctly for some keyboard layouts. The gnome-shell bug was fixed in 46.2. Tecla has these advantages compared to libgnomekbd: - Uses GTK4 and libadwaita - Which means improved support for the dark style preference (Ubuntu enables dark style in many more places than GNOME normally does so the libgnomekbd viewer has partial dark style support in Ubuntu.) - Much more modern looking window - Consistency with the existing ⋮ > View Keyboard Layout in GNOME Settings > Keyboard - Does what every other GNOME 45 or GNOME 46 distro does (Screenshots attached to show differences) Therefore, this SRU drops the revert patch, drops Recommends: gkbd- capplet and adds Depends: tecla. apt should mark gkbd-capplet for autoremoval since nothing in the default Ubuntu Desktop Depends or Recommends it any more. It is harmless if either gkbd-capplet is uninstalled or kept installed. gnome-control-center already has Depends: tecla so this is not installing anything new. Test Case = From a terminal, run sudo apt install language-pack-gnome-fr Install the gnome-shell update. Log out and log back in. Open the GNOME Settings app (gnome-control-center). In the left sidebar, click Keyboard. Click Add Input Source… In the dialog, choose French (France), then choose French (AZERTY) then Add. In the right side of GNOME Shell's top bar, the keyboard layout switcher should be visible with en. Click en then change the keyboard layout to French (AZERTY). Click Show Keyboard Layout. A popup should show a keyboard layout with the second row of characters beginning with a z e r t y as shown in the tecla-azerty-light.png or tecla-azerty-dark.png screenshots. Close the keyboard layout popup. Switch the keyboard layout back to en Click Show Keyboard Layout The popup should display with the keyboard layout set to your usual English keyboard layout. What Could Go Wrong === This is a fairly minor feature and should not be essential to anyone who needs alternate keyboard layouts. I would guess people would be more likely to click the ⋮ > View Keyboard Layout option in GNOME Settings > Keyboard when choosing input sources rather than via GNOME Shell. And GNOME Settings was already set to use Tecla. This change does not affect actual usability of alternate keyboard layouts, just the single button to view the layout. Other Info == This change means that libgnomekbd will be demoted from main to universe for Ubuntu 24.10. For technical reasons, that demotion is not possible for already released stable versions of Ubuntu like Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. ** Affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Importance: Low Status: Fix Released ** Affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Low Status: Triaged ** Tags: noble ** Attachment added: "tecla-azerty-dark.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068243/+attachment/5786332/+files/tecla-azerty-dark.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068243 Title: Switch keyboard layout viewer to tecla To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2068243/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068243] Re: Switch keyboard layout viewer to tecla
** Attachment added: "tecla-azerty-light.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2068243/+attachment/5786333/+files/tecla-azerty-light.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068243 Title: Switch keyboard layout viewer to tecla To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2068243/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068065] [NEW] Update gnome-builder to 46.2
Public bug reported: Impact - This is a new stable release in the 46 series. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-builder/-/blob/46.2/NEWS Also, this adds a dependency to fix keyboard shortcuts not working (see the linked Debian bug). This issue is now tested in step 7 of the below test plan. Test Case -- Complete the test case from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/GnomeBuilder What Could Go Wrong --- GNOME Builder is a standalone app that is not installed by default by any Ubuntu flavor. If there is a critical bug preventing GNOME Builder from being usable, a developer could use another IDE such as Visual Studio Code. GNOME Builder is also distributed as a Flatpak and developers could use that if Ubuntu's .deb version is not working. (The .deb version of GNOME Builder installs flatpak by default anyway since that's how the build and run command is implemented for GNOME apps.) As a component of GNOME core, there is a micro-release exception for gnome-builder https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/GNOME ** Affects: gnome-builder (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: Fix Released ** Affects: gnome-builder (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Medium Status: In Progress ** Affects: gnome-builder (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Tags: noble upgrade-software-version ** Also affects: gnome-builder (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gnome-builder (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: gnome-builder (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1072154 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072154 ** Also affects: gnome-builder (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072154 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Description changed: Impact - This is a new stable release in the 46 series. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-builder/-/blob/46.2/NEWS - - Also, this adds a dependency to fix keyboard shortcuts not working. This issue is now tested in step 7 of the below test plan. + Also, this adds a dependency to fix keyboard shortcuts not working (see + the linked Debian bug). This issue is now tested in step 7 of the below + test plan. Test Case -- Complete the test case from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/GnomeBuilder What Could Go Wrong --- GNOME Builder is a standalone app that is not installed by default by any Ubuntu flavor. If there is a critical bug preventing GNOME Builder from being usable, a developer could use another IDE such as Visual Studio Code. GNOME Builder is also distributed as a Flatpak and developers could use that if Ubuntu's .deb version is not working. (The .deb version of GNOME Builder installs flatpak by default anyway since that's how the build and run command is implemented for GNOME apps.) As a component of GNOME core, there is a micro-release exception for gnome-builder https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/GNOME -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068065 Title: Update gnome-builder to 46.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-builder/+bug/2068065/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066269] Re: [MIR] sysprof
** Description changed: [Availability] The package sysprof is already in Ubuntu universe. The package sysprof build for the architectures it is designed to work on. It currently builds and works for all Ubuntu architectures. Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof [Rationale] - The package sysprof is required in Ubuntu main - The package sysprof will not generally be useful for a large part of our user base, but is important/helpful still because it is part of an Ubuntu initiative to focus on performance engineering, both for Ubuntu itself and for developers who build their projects on top of Ubuntu. The size of the sysprof app is fairly small and we envision sysprof as the latest of the small utilities that are included in a default Ubuntu desktop. (Disk Usage Analyzer [baobab] is another one of these utilities.) + Related to https://ubuntu.com/blog/ubuntu-performance-engineering-with-frame-pointers-by-default - There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or should go universe->main instead of this. - The package sysprof is required in Ubuntu main no later than August 15 due to a Ubuntu Desktop goal of including sysprof in the default 24.10 install. - The binary package sysprof needs to be in main to achieve the goal of providing a GUI performance profiling tool (command-line tools were included by default in Ubuntu 24.04 LTS, but the Desktop Team and others did not have the capacity to also handle getting sysprof into the default install then.) [Security] - No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past + https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/sysprof + https://ubuntu.com/security/cves?package=sysprof - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries - no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` - Package does install services, timers or recurring jobs + /usr/lib/systemd/system/sysprof3.service + /usr/libexec/sysprofd + /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.gnome.Sysprof3.service - Security has been kept in mind and common isolation/risk-mitigation patterns are in place utilizing the following features: + App uses /usr/share/polkit-1/actions/org.gnome.sysprof3.policy to gain the elevated permissions it needs to use ptracing in the Linux kernel. - Package does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). - Package does not expose any external endpoints - Package makes use of ptracing in the Linux kernel because it is required for the system-wide profiling feature that is essential to this app. I recommend Security Team review. [Quality assurance - function/usage] - The package works well right after install [Quality assurance - maintenance] - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does not have too many, long-term & critical, open bugs - Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof/ - Debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=sysprof - Upstream https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/sysprof/-/issues - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support [Quality assurance - testing] - The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails it makes the build fail, link to build log https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof/46.0-1build1 - The package runs an autopkgtest, and is currently passing on all architectures except for i386 https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/sysprof - We also will do manual testing of the GUI app https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/Sysprof [Quality assurance - packaging] - debian/watch is present and works - debian/control defines a correct Maintainer field - This package does not yield massive lintian Warnings, Errors - Please link to a recent build log of the package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof/46.0-1build1 - Please attach the full output you have got from `lintian --pedantic` as an extra post to this bug. - Lintian overrides are present, but ok because the overrides document why those Lintian warnings should be ignored. - This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted packages. - This package has no python2 or GTK2 dependencies - The package will be installed by default, but does not ask debconf questions - Packaging and build is easy, link to debian/rules https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/sysprof/-/blob/debian/latest/debian/rules [UI standards] - Application is end-user facing, Translation is present, via standard gettext system - End-user applications that ships a standard conformant desktop file + /usr/share/applications/org.gnome.Sysprof.desktop [Dependencies] - There are further runtime dependencies that are not yet in main + MIR for libdex is at LP: #2066262 + MIR for libpanel is at LP: #2066272 [Standards compliance] - This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy [Maintenance/Owner] - The owning team will be
[Bug 2066269] Re: [MIR] sysprof
Running lintian... W: sysprof source: newer-standards-version 4.7.0 (current is 4.6.2) W: sysprof: no-manual-page [usr/bin/sysprof-agent] I: sysprof: desktop-entry-lacks-keywords-entry [usr/share/applications/org.gnome.Sysprof.desktop] I: sysprof source: superficial-tests [debian/tests/control] I: sysprof: systemd-service-file-missing-documentation-key [usr/lib/systemd/system/sysprof3.service] P: sysprof source: maintainer-manual-page [debian/sysprof-cli.1] P: sysprof source: maintainer-manual-page [debian/sysprof.1] P: sysprof source: package-does-not-install-examples [examples/] N: these are LD_PRELOAD modules, not libraries O: libsysprof-6-modules: lacks-ldconfig-trigger usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsysprof-memory-6.so usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsysprof-speedtrack-6.so usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsysprof-tracer-6.so O: libsysprof-6-modules: no-shlibs usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsysprof-memory-6.so O: libsysprof-6-modules: no-shlibs usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsysprof-speedtrack-6.so O: libsysprof-6-modules: no-shlibs usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsysprof-tracer-6.so O: libsysprof-6-modules: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsysprof-memory-6.so O: libsysprof-6-modules: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsysprof-speedtrack-6.so O: libsysprof-6-modules: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsysprof-tracer-6.so O: libsysprof-6-modules: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libsysprof-memory-6 libsysprof-speedtrack-6 libsysprof-tracer-6 N: sysprofd is D-Bus-activated and does not need to be started during boot. O: sysprof: systemd-service-file-missing-install-key [usr/lib/systemd/system/sysprof3.service] ** Description changed: [Availability] The package sysprof is already in Ubuntu universe. The package sysprof build for the architectures it is designed to work on. It currently builds and works for all Ubuntu architectures. Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof [Rationale] - The package sysprof is required in Ubuntu main - The package sysprof will not generally be useful for a large part of our user base, but is important/helpful still because it is part of an Ubuntu initiative to focus on performance engineering, both for Ubuntu itself and for developers who build their projects on top of Ubuntu. The size of the sysprof app is fairly small and we envision sysprof as the latest of the small utilities that are included in a default Ubuntu desktop. (Disk Usage Analyzer [baobab] is another one of these utilities.) + Related to https://ubuntu.com/blog/ubuntu-performance-engineering-with-frame-pointers-by-default - There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or should go universe->main instead of this. - The package sysprof is required in Ubuntu main no later than August 15 due to a Ubuntu Desktop goal of including sysprof in the default 24.10 install. - The binary package sysprof needs to be in main to achieve the goal of providing a GUI performance profiling tool (command-line tools were included by default in Ubuntu 24.04 LTS, but the Desktop Team and others did not have the capacity to also handle getting sysprof into the default install then.) [Security] - No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past + https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/sysprof + https://ubuntu.com/security/cves?package=sysprof - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries - no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` - Package does install services, timers or recurring jobs + /usr/lib/systemd/system/sysprof3.service + /usr/libexec/sysprofd + /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.gnome.Sysprof3.service - Security has been kept in mind and common isolation/risk-mitigation patterns are in place utilizing the following features: + App uses /usr/share/polkit-1/actions/org.gnome.sysprof3.policy to gain the elevated permissions it needs to use ptracing in the Linux kernel. - Package does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). - Package does not expose any external endpoints - Package makes use of ptracing in the Linux kernel because it is required for the system-wide profiling feature that is essential to this app. I recommend Security Team review. [Quality assurance - function/usage] - The package works well right after install [Quality assurance - maintenance] - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does not have too many, long-term & critical, open bugs - Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof/ - Debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=sysprof - Upstream https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/sysprof/-/issues - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support [Quality assurance - testing] - The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails it makes the build fail, link to build log
[Bug 2066262] Re: [MIR] libdex
** Changed in: libdex (Ubuntu) Assignee: Jeremy Bícha (jbicha) => (unassigned) ** Description changed: [Availability] The package libdex is already in Ubuntu universe. The package libdex build for the architectures it is designed to work on. It currently builds and works for all Ubuntu architectures. Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdex [Rationale] - The package libdex is required in Ubuntu main because it is a runtime dependency of sysprof (MIR LP: #2066269) - There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or should go universe->main instead of this. - The package libdex is required in Ubuntu main no later than August 15 due to a Ubuntu Desktop goal of including sysprof in the default 24.10 install [Security] - No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past + Note that CVE-2016-3758 is about a vulnerability in Android's libdex which is a completely different project with no shared history or functionality. GNOME libdex was not created until 2022. + https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/libdex + https://ubuntu.com/security/cves?package=libdex - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries - no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` - Package does not install services, timers or recurring jobs - TODO: - Security has been kept in mind and common isolation/risk-mitigation - TODO: patterns are in place utilizing the following features: - TODO: TBD (add details and links/examples about things like dropping - TODO: permissions, using temporary environments, restricted users/groups, - TODO: seccomp, systemd isolation features, apparmor, ...) - Package does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). - Package does not expose any external endpoints - Package does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software (filters, scanners, plugins, UI skins, ...) - TODO: I noticed that libdex uses liburing which uses the Linux kernel io_uring interface. Wikipedia points out that io_uring is a frequent source of bugs in the Linux kernel. I don't know if this matters for apps using liburing, but I think the Security Team should have a look. libdex does have a build-time option to disable liburing in cases where it is unavailable (for instance it's disabled on i386 since Ubuntu currently doesn't build liburing on i386). [Quality assurance - function/usage] - The package works well right after install [Quality assurance - maintenance] - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does not have too many, long-term & critical, open bugs - Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdex/ - Debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=libdex - Upstream https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libdex/-/issues - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support [Quality assurance - testing] - The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails it makes the build fail, link to build log https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdex/0.6.1-1 - The package does not run an autopkgtest. See next lines. - This package is minimal and will be tested in a more wide reaching solution. + libdex is only used by sysprof and gnome-builder. In addition to the existing build tests for libdex, we will also do manual testing for Sysprof and GNOME Builder. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/Sysprof https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/GnomeBuilder [Quality assurance - packaging] - debian/watch is present and works - debian/control defines a correct Maintainer field - This package does not yield massive lintian Warnings, Errors - Please link to a recent build log of the package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdex/0.6.1-1 - Please attach the full output you have got from `lintian --pedantic` as an extra post to this bug. - Lintian overrides are not present - This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted packages. - This package has no python2 or GTK2 dependencies - The package will be installed by default, but does not ask debconf questions - Packaging and build is easy, link to debian/rules https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/libdex/-/blob/debian/latest/debian/rules [UI standards] - Application is not end-user facing (does not need translation) [Dependencies] - No further depends or recommends dependencies that are not yet in main [Standards compliance] - This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy [Maintenance/Owner] - The owning team will be Ubuntu Desktop (~desktop-packages) and I have their acknowledgement for that commitment - The future owning team is not yet subscribed, but will subscribe to the package before promotion - This does not use static builds - This does not use vendored code - This package is not rust based - The package has been built in the archive more
[Bug 2066269] Re: [MIR] sysprof
** Changed in: sysprof (Ubuntu) Assignee: Jeremy Bícha (jbicha) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066269 Title: [MIR] sysprof To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof/+bug/2066269/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066272] Re: [MIR] libpanel
W: libpanel source: newer-standards-version 4.7.0 (current is 4.6.2) W: libpanel-doc: stray-devhelp-documentation [usr/share/doc/panel-1.0/panel-1.0.devhelp2] I: libpanel-doc: possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration The latest Debian Policy is 4.7.0 but lintian has not been updated since that version was released. https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/debian-policy The devhelp warning is a false warning. Many GNOME modules have switched to gi-docgen to build help and it does things differently that the older gtk-doc-tools. The devhelp app was updated to support devhelp2 files being located in this location. doc-base is a Debianism that I believe to only barely be used. ** Changed in: libpanel (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Changed in: libpanel (Ubuntu) Assignee: Jeremy Bícha (jbicha) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066272 Title: [MIR] libpanel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpanel/+bug/2066272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066262] Re: [MIR] libdex
Running lintian... W: libdex source: newer-standards-version 4.7.0 (current is 4.6.2) W: libdex-doc: stray-devhelp-documentation [usr/share/doc/libdex-1/libdex-1.devhelp2] I: libdex-doc: possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration P: libdex source: package-does-not-install-examples [examples/] All of these can be ignored. The latest Debian Policy is 4.7.0 but lintian has not been updated since that version was released. https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/debian-policy The devhelp warning is a false warning. Many GNOME modules have switched to gi-docgen to build help and it does things differently that the older gtk-doc-tools. The devhelp app was updated to support devhelp2 files being located in this location. doc-base is a Debianism that I believe to only barely be used. The examples are built during the build but are intentionally not installed per upstream's meson.build https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libdex/-/blob/main/examples/meson.build -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066262 Title: [MIR] libdex To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdex/+bug/2066262/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066272] Re: [MIR] libpanel
** Description changed: - TODO + [Availability] + The package libpanel is already in Ubuntu universe. + The package libpanel build for the architectures it is designed to work on. + It currently builds and works for all Ubuntu architectures except for i386. + Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpanel + + [Rationale] + - The package libpanel is required in Ubuntu main because it is a runtime dependency of sysprof (MIR LP: #2066269) + - There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or should go universe->main instead of this. + - The package libpanel is required in Ubuntu main no later than August 15 due to a Ubuntu Desktop goal of including sysprof in the default 24.10 install + + [Security] + - No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past + + https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/libpanel + + https://ubuntu.com/security/cves?package=libpanel + + - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries + - no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` + - Package does not install services, timers or recurring jobs + - Package does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). + - Package does not expose any external endpoints + - Package does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software (filters, scanners, plugins, UI skins, ...) + + [Quality assurance - function/usage] + - The package works well right after install + + [Quality assurance - maintenance] + - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does not have too many, long-term & critical, open bugs + - Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpanel/ + - Debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=libpanel + - Upstream https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libpanel/-/issues + - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support + + [Quality assurance - testing] + - The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails it makes the build fail, link to build log + https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpanel/1.6.0-1build1 + + - The package does not run an autopkgtest. See next lines. + + - This package is minimal and will be tested in a more wide reaching solution. + + libpanel is only used by sysprof and gnome-builder. In addition to the existing build tests for libpanel, we will also do manual testing for Sysprof and GNOME Builder. + + https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/Sysprof + https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/GnomeBuilder + + [Quality assurance - packaging] + - debian/watch is present and works + - debian/control defines a correct Maintainer field + - This package does not yield massive lintian Warnings, Errors + - Please link to a recent build log of the package + https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpanel/1.6.0-1build1 + - Please attach the full output you have got from `lintian --pedantic` as an extra post to this bug. + - Lintian overrides are not present + + - This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted packages. + - This package has no python2 or GTK2 dependencies + + - The package will be installed by default, but does not ask debconf questions + - Packaging and build is easy, link to debian/rules https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/libpanel/-/blob/debian/latest/debian/rules + + [UI standards] + - Application is end-user facing, Translation is present, via standard + gettext build and runtime internationalization system + + - End-user applications without desktop file, not needed because this is + a UI library (with translatable strings) but is not actually an app + itself so no need for a .desktop + + [Dependencies] + - No further depends or recommends dependencies that are not yet in main + + [Standards compliance] + - This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy + + [Maintenance/Owner] + - The owning team will be Ubuntu Desktop (~desktop-packages) and I have their acknowledgement for that commitment + - The future owning team is not yet subscribed, but will subscribe to the package before promotion + + - This does not use static builds + - This does not use vendored code + - This package is not rust based + + - The package has been built in the archive more recently than the last + test rebuild + + [Background information] + - The Package description explains the package well + - Upstream Name is libpanel + - Link to upstream project https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libpanel -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066272 Title: [MIR] libpanel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpanel/+bug/2066272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066262] Re: [MIR] libdex
** Description changed: [Availability] The package libdex is already in Ubuntu universe. The package libdex build for the architectures it is designed to work on. It currently builds and works for all Ubuntu architectures. Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdex [Rationale] - - The package libdex is required in Ubuntu main because it is a runtime dependency of sysprof (MIR LP: #) + - The package libdex is required in Ubuntu main because it is a runtime dependency of sysprof (MIR LP: #2066269) - There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or should go universe->main instead of this. - The package libdex is required in Ubuntu main no later than August 15 due to a Ubuntu Desktop goal of including sysprof in the default 24.10 install [Security] - No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past + Note that CVE-2016-3758 is about a vulnerability in Android's libdex which is a completely different project with no shared history or functionality. GNOME libdex was not created until 2022. + https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/libdex + https://ubuntu.com/security/cves?package=libdex - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries - no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` - Package does not install services, timers or recurring jobs TODO: - Security has been kept in mind and common isolation/risk-mitigation TODO: patterns are in place utilizing the following features: TODO: TBD (add details and links/examples about things like dropping TODO: permissions, using temporary environments, restricted users/groups, TODO: seccomp, systemd isolation features, apparmor, ...) - Package does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). - Package does not expose any external endpoints - Package does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software (filters, scanners, plugins, UI skins, ...) - TODO: I noticed that libdex uses liburing which uses the Linux kernel io_uring interface. Wikipedia points out that io_uring is a frequent source of bugs in the Linux kernel. I don't know if this matters for apps using liburing, but I think the Security Team should have a look. libdex does have a build-time option to disable liburing in cases where it is unavailable (for instance it's disabled on i386 since Ubuntu currently doesn't build liburing on i386). [Quality assurance - function/usage] - The package works well right after install [Quality assurance - maintenance] - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does not have too many, long-term & critical, open bugs - Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdex/ - Debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=libdex - Upstream https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libdex/-/issues - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support [Quality assurance - testing] - The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails it makes the build fail, link to build log - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdex/0.6.0-1build1 + https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdex/0.6.1-1 - RULE: - The package should, but is not required to, also contain - RULE: non-trivial autopkgtest(s). - TODO-A: - The package runs an autopkgtest, and is currently passing on - TODO-A: this TBD list of architectures, link to test logs TBD - TODO-B: - The package does not run an autopkgtest because TBD + - The package does not run an autopkgtest. See next lines. - RULE: - existing but failing tests that shall be handled as "ok to fail" - RULE: need to be explained along the test logs below - TODO-A: - The package does have not failing autopkgtests right now - TODO-B: - The package does have failing autopkgtests tests right now, but since - TODO-B: they always failed they are handled as "ignored failure", this is - TODO-B: ok because TBD + - This package is minimal and will be tested in a more wide reaching solution. + + libdex is only used by sysprof and gnome-builder. In addition to the existing build tests for libdex, we will also do manual testing for Sysprof and GNOME Builder. - RULE: - If no build tests nor autopkgtests are included, and/or if the package - RULE: requires specific hardware to perform testing, the subscribed team - RULE: must provide a written test plan in a comment to the MIR bug, and - RULE: commit to running that test either at each upload of the package or - RULE: at least once each release cycle. In the comment to the MIR bug, - RULE: please link to the codebase of these tests (scripts or doc of manual - RULE: steps) and attach a full log of these test runs. This is meant to - RULE: assess their validity (e.g. not just superficial). - RULE: If possible such things should stay in universe. Sometimes that is - RULE: impossible due to the way how features/plugins/dependencies work - RULE: but if you are going to ask for promotion of
[Bug 2024064] Re: libssh dep8 fails on ppc64el/s390x
The autopkgtests are passing now so I'm closing this bug. https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libssh ** Changed in: libssh (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024064 Title: libssh dep8 fails on ppc64el/s390x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libssh/+bug/2024064/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067844] Re: [nvidia] gnome-control-center render and graphics bug on ubuntu 24 fresh install
See bug 2061079 which might be similar to what you are experiencing. ** Summary changed: - gnome-control-center render and graphics bug on ubuntu 24 fresh install + [nvidia] gnome-control-center render and graphics bug on ubuntu 24 fresh install ** Tags added: nvidia -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067844 Title: [nvidia] gnome-control-center render and graphics bug on ubuntu 24 fresh install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/2067844/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065587] Re: Add explicit dependency on glib 2.80 to ease upgrades 22.04 → 24.04
We do actually need to keep this change since GNOME Shell 46.2 now requires glib 2.80. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/commit/11a10214 It does not need to be listed as an SRU bug though. ** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Triaged => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065587 Title: Add explicit dependency on glib 2.80 to ease upgrades 22.04 → 24.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2065587/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2038906] Re: Ubuntu desktop ISOs are around 700MB larger than legacy desktop ISOs
@wontfix, please open a separate bug for that issue -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038906 Title: Ubuntu desktop ISOs are around 700MB larger than legacy desktop ISOs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2038906/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067420] [NEW] Update gnome-calculator to 46.1
Public bug reported: . ** Affects: gnome-calculator (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: Fix Committed ** Tags: noble upgrade-software-version -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067420 Title: Update gnome-calculator to 46.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-calculator/+bug/2067420/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067418] [NEW] Update libadwaita to 1.5.1
Public bug reported: Impact -- 1. There is a new release in the stable 1.5 series. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libadwaita/-/blob/1.5.1/NEWS Test Case 1 --- After installing the update, open gnome-control-center and nautilus. Ensure that the apps run and that the on/off switches, checkboxes, and other visual elements still display correctly. In gnome-control-center click Appearance in the sidebar. Verify that switching the style between Light and Dark works correctly. Also choose a different accent color and verify that elements like folder icons in Nautilus and on/off switches have correctly adopted the accent color you chose. Test Case 2 --- Run adwaita-1-demo run the style classes demo check that all elements are properly visible and check that link color has enough contrast with background. What Could Go Wrong --- libadwaita is an addon library to GTK4 to allow apps to easily use more of the GNOME style and allow for widgets to be added and improved faster than in the normal GTK development cycle. libadwaita is included in all Ubuntu desktop flavors except for Kubuntu & Lubuntu. Many of the default Ubuntu desktop apps and even GNOME Shell in 24.04 LTS use libadwaita. As a component of GNOME core, there is a micro-release exception for libadwaita. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/GNOME ** Affects: libadwaita-1 (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: Fix Committed ** Affects: libadwaita-1 (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Medium Status: Triaged ** Tags: noble ** Also affects: libadwaita-1 (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: libadwaita-1 (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: libadwaita-1 (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067418 Title: Update libadwaita to 1.5.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libadwaita-1/+bug/2067418/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063333] Re: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process
Felipe, please open a new bug for that issue using ubuntu-bug gnome-remote-desktop ** Changed in: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206 Title: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/206/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067147] Re: ubuntu 22.04 startup application settings not work
** Package changed: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) => gnome-session (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067147 Title: ubuntu 22.04 startup application settings not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bug/2067147/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062011] Re: Please update libjxl to newest version in 24.04 to address security vulnerabilities
** Also affects: jpeg-xl (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: jpeg-xl (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: jpeg-xl (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Triaged => New ** Changed in: jpeg-xl (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062011 Title: Please update libjxl to newest version in 24.04 to address security vulnerabilities To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jpeg-xl/+bug/2062011/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063333] Re: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process
** Changed in: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206 Title: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/206/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063333] Re: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process
** Tags removed: block-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206 Title: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/206/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066306] [NEW] CVE-2024-5148: limit session handover to appropriate user
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: There is a new gnome-remote-desktop release in the stable 46.x branch. I suggest that we simply update Ubuntu 24.04 LTS from 46.1 to 46.2 since there are other hardening improvements in the release. Other Ubuntu releases were not affected by the specific issue that was assigned the CVE since it is unique to the new "Remote Login" feature introduced in gnome-remote-desktop 46. Other Info -- There is a significant existing regression in systems that were upgraded to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS but as of today we haven't finished the fix: LP: #206 (This issue has nothing to do with the security fix or with gnome-remote-desktop 46.2.) That fix might need to be handled with a regular SRU later. ** Affects: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Committed ** Affects: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: noble ** Also affects: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066306 Title: CVE-2024-5148: limit session handover to appropriate user To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/2066306/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061754] Re: nullboot 0.5.1
There was no comment on why the block-proposed tag was added. It looked like it was added only to keep the package from reaching Noble. It is also early in the Oracular cycle. Sorry if this caused extra work and headache. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061754 Title: nullboot 0.5.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nullboot/+bug/2061754/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058478] Re: Please merge libevent 2.1.12-stable-8.1 from Debian unstable
This bug was fixed in the package libevent - 2.1.12-stable-10 --- libevent (2.1.12-stable-10) unstable; urgency=medium * d/symbols: Remove event_strlcpy_ symbol, now provided by glibc 2.38 (Closes: #1071323, #1055290) * d/copyright: Update copyright year * d/control: upgrade standards version to 4.7.0 -- Nicolas Mora Fri, 17 May 2024 19:19:31 -0400 ** Changed in: libevent (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058478 Title: Please merge libevent 2.1.12-stable-8.1 from Debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libevent/+bug/2058478/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064438] Re: Merge pam-p11 from Debian unstable for oracular
It looks like the Ubuntu diff was incorporated into upstream 0.6.0 so I synced the package: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam-p11/0.6.0-1 ** Changed in: pam-p11 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064438 Title: Merge pam-p11 from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam-p11/+bug/2064438/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058401] Re: Enable automated tests
I worked around the exported symbols issue by doing the build twice. ** Changed in: freerdp3 (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: freerdp3 (Ubuntu) Assignee: Nathan Teodosio (nteodosio) => (unassigned) ** Also affects: freerdp3 (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: freerdp3 (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: freerdp3 (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058401 Title: Enable automated tests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freerdp3/+bug/2058401/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066269] Re: [MIR] sysprof
** Description changed: [Availability] The package sysprof is already in Ubuntu universe. The package sysprof build for the architectures it is designed to work on. It currently builds and works for all Ubuntu architectures. Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof [Rationale] - The package sysprof is required in Ubuntu main - The package sysprof will not generally be useful for a large part of our user base, but is important/helpful still because it is part of an Ubuntu initiative to focus on performance engineering, both for Ubuntu itself and for developers who build their projects on top of Ubuntu. The size of the sysprof app is fairly small and we envision sysprof as the latest of the small utilities that are included in a default Ubuntu desktop. (Disk Usage Analyzer [baobab] is another one of these utilities.) + Related to https://ubuntu.com/blog/ubuntu-performance-engineering-with-frame-pointers-by-default - There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or should go universe->main instead of this. - The package sysprof is required in Ubuntu main no later than August 15 due to a Ubuntu Desktop goal of including sysprof in the default 24.10 install. - The binary package sysprof needs to be in main to achieve the goal of providing a GUI performance profiling tool (command-line tools were included by default in Ubuntu 24.04 LTS, but the Desktop Team and others did not have the capacity to also handle getting sysprof into the default install then.) [Security] - No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past + https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/sysprof + https://ubuntu.com/security/cves?package=sysprof - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries - no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` - Package does install services, timers or recurring jobs + /usr/lib/systemd/system/sysprof3.service + /usr/libexec/sysprofd + /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.gnome.Sysprof3.service - Security has been kept in mind and common isolation/risk-mitigation patterns are in place utilizing the following features: + App uses /usr/share/polkit-1/actions/org.gnome.sysprof3.policy to gain the elevated permissions it needs to use ptracing in the Linux kernel. - Package does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). - Package does not expose any external endpoints - Package makes use of ptracing in the Linux kernel because it is required for the system-wide profiling feature that is essential to this app. I recommend Security Team review. [Quality assurance - function/usage] - The package works well right after install [Quality assurance - maintenance] - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does not have too many, long-term & critical, open bugs - Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof/ - Debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=sysprof - Upstream https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/sysprof/-/issues - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support [Quality assurance - testing] - The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails it makes the build fail, link to build log https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof/46.0-1build1 RULE: - The package should, but is not required to, also contain RULE: non-trivial autopkgtest(s). TODO-A: - The package runs an autopkgtest, and is currently passing on TODO-A: this TBD list of architectures, link to test logs TBD TODO-B: - The package does not run an autopkgtest because TBD RULE: - existing but failing tests that shall be handled as "ok to fail" RULE: need to be explained along the test logs below TODO-A: - The package does have not failing autopkgtests right now TODO-B: - The package does have failing autopkgtests tests right now, but since TODO-B: they always failed they are handled as "ignored failure", this is TODO-B: ok because TBD RULE: - If no build tests nor autopkgtests are included, and/or if the package RULE: requires specific hardware to perform testing, the subscribed team RULE: must provide a written test plan in a comment to the MIR bug, and RULE: commit to running that test either at each upload of the package or RULE: at least once each release cycle. In the comment to the MIR bug, RULE: please link to the codebase of these tests (scripts or doc of manual RULE: steps) and attach a full log of these test runs. This is meant to RULE: assess their validity (e.g. not just superficial). RULE: If possible such things should stay in universe. Sometimes that is RULE: impossible due to the way how features/plugins/dependencies work RULE: but if you are going to ask for promotion of something untestable RULE: please outline why it couldn't provide its value (e.g. by splitting RULE: binaries) to users from universe. RULE: This is a
[Bug 2066262] Re: [MIR] libdex
** Changed in: libdex (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jeremy Bícha (jbicha) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066262 Title: [MIR] libdex To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdex/+bug/2066262/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066269] Re: [MIR] sysprof
ions/org.gnome.Sysprof.desktop [Dependencies] - There are further runtime dependencies that are not yet in main + MIR for libdex is at LP: #2066262 + + MIR for panel is at LP: #2066272 [Standards compliance] - This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy [Maintenance/Owner] - The owning team will be Ubuntu Desktop (~desktop-packages) and I have their acknowledgement for that commitment - The future owning team is not yet subscribed, but will subscribe to the package before promotion - This does not use static builds - This does not use vendored code - This package is not rust based - The package has been built in the archive more recently than the last test rebuild [Background information] - The Package description explains the package well - Upstream Name is sysprof - Link to upstream project https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/sysprof ** Changed in: sysprof (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jeremy Bícha (jbicha) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066269 Title: [MIR] sysprof To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof/+bug/2066269/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066272] [NEW] [MIR] libpanel
Public bug reported: TODO ** Affects: libpanel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Jeremy Bícha (jbicha) Status: Incomplete ** Tags: oracular ** Changed in: libpanel (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jeremy Bícha (jbicha) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066272 Title: [MIR] libpanel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpanel/+bug/2066272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066269] [NEW] [MIR] sysprof
Public bug reported: [Availability] The package sysprof is already in Ubuntu universe. The package sysprof build for the architectures it is designed to work on. It currently builds and works for all Ubuntu architectures. Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof [Rationale] - The package sysprof is required in Ubuntu main - The package sysprof will not generally be useful for a large part of our user base, but is important/helpful still because it is part of an Ubuntu initiative to focus on performance engineering, both for Ubuntu itself and for developers who build their projects on top of Ubuntu. The size of the sysprof app is fairly small and we envision sysprof as the latest of the small utilities that are included in a default Ubuntu desktop. (Disk Usage Analyzer [baobab] is another one of these utilities.) + Related to https://ubuntu.com/blog/ubuntu-performance-engineering-with-frame-pointers-by-default - There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or should go universe->main instead of this. - The package sysprof is required in Ubuntu main no later than August 15 due to a Ubuntu Desktop goal of including sysprof in the default 24.10 install. - The binary package sysprof needs to be in main to achieve the goal of providing a GUI performance profiling tool (command-line tools were included by default in Ubuntu 24.04 LTS, but the Desktop Team and others did not have the capacity to also handle getting sysprof into the default install then.) [Security] - No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past + https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/sysprof + https://ubuntu.com/security/cves?package=sysprof - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries - no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` - Package does install services, timers or recurring jobs + /usr/lib/systemd/system/sysprof3.service + /usr/libexec/sysprofd + /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.gnome.Sysprof3.service - Security has been kept in mind and common isolation/risk-mitigation patterns are in place utilizing the following features: + App uses /usr/share/polkit-1/actions/org.gnome.sysprof3.policy to gain the elevated permissions it needs to use ptracing in the Linux kernel. - Package does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). - Package does not expose any external endpoints - Package makes use of ptracing in the Linux kernel because it is required for the system-wide profiling feature that is essential to this app. I recommend Security Team review. [Quality assurance - function/usage] - The package works well right after install [Quality assurance - maintenance] - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does not have too many, long-term & critical, open bugs - Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof/ - Debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=sysprof - Upstream https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/sysprof/-/issues - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support [Quality assurance - testing] - The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails it makes the build fail, link to build log https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof/46.0-1build1 RULE: - The package should, but is not required to, also contain RULE: non-trivial autopkgtest(s). TODO-A: - The package runs an autopkgtest, and is currently passing on TODO-A: this TBD list of architectures, link to test logs TBD TODO-B: - The package does not run an autopkgtest because TBD RULE: - existing but failing tests that shall be handled as "ok to fail" RULE: need to be explained along the test logs below TODO-A: - The package does have not failing autopkgtests right now TODO-B: - The package does have failing autopkgtests tests right now, but since TODO-B: they always failed they are handled as "ignored failure", this is TODO-B: ok because TBD RULE: - If no build tests nor autopkgtests are included, and/or if the package RULE: requires specific hardware to perform testing, the subscribed team RULE: must provide a written test plan in a comment to the MIR bug, and RULE: commit to running that test either at each upload of the package or RULE: at least once each release cycle. In the comment to the MIR bug, RULE: please link to the codebase of these tests (scripts or doc of manual RULE: steps) and attach a full log of these test runs. This is meant to RULE: assess their validity (e.g. not just superficial). RULE: If possible such things should stay in universe. Sometimes that is RULE: impossible due to the way how features/plugins/dependencies work RULE: but if you are going to ask for promotion of something untestable RULE: please outline why it couldn't provide its value (e.g. by splitting RULE: binaries) to users from universe. RULE: This is a balance that is hard to strike well, the request is that all RULE: options have been exploited before giving up. Look for more details RULE: and
[Bug 2066262] [NEW] [MIR] libdex
Public bug reported: [Availability] The package libdex is already in Ubuntu universe. The package libdex build for the architectures it is designed to work on. It currently builds and works for all Ubuntu architectures. Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdex [Rationale] - The package libdex is required in Ubuntu main because it is a runtime dependency of sysprof (MIR LP: #) - There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or should go universe->main instead of this. - The package libdex is required in Ubuntu main no later than August 15 due to a Ubuntu Desktop goal of including sysprof in the default 24.10 install [Security] - No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past + Note that CVE-2016-3758 is about a vulnerability in Android's libdex which is a completely different project with no shared history or functionality. GNOME libdex was not created until 2022. + https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/libdex + https://ubuntu.com/security/cves?package=libdex - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries - no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` - Package does not install services, timers or recurring jobs TODO: - Security has been kept in mind and common isolation/risk-mitigation TODO: patterns are in place utilizing the following features: TODO: TBD (add details and links/examples about things like dropping TODO: permissions, using temporary environments, restricted users/groups, TODO: seccomp, systemd isolation features, apparmor, ...) - Package does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). - Package does not expose any external endpoints - Package does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software (filters, scanners, plugins, UI skins, ...) - TODO: I noticed that libdex uses liburing which uses the Linux kernel io_uring interface. Wikipedia points out that io_uring is a frequent source of bugs in the Linux kernel. I don't know if this matters for apps using liburing, but I think the Security Team should have a look. libdex does have a build-time option to disable liburing in cases where it is unavailable (for instance it's disabled on i386 since Ubuntu currently doesn't build liburing on i386). [Quality assurance - function/usage] - The package works well right after install [Quality assurance - maintenance] - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does not have too many, long-term & critical, open bugs - Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdex/ - Debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=libdex - Upstream https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libdex/-/issues - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support [Quality assurance - testing] - The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails it makes the build fail, link to build log https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdex/0.6.0-1build1 RULE: - The package should, but is not required to, also contain RULE: non-trivial autopkgtest(s). TODO-A: - The package runs an autopkgtest, and is currently passing on TODO-A: this TBD list of architectures, link to test logs TBD TODO-B: - The package does not run an autopkgtest because TBD RULE: - existing but failing tests that shall be handled as "ok to fail" RULE: need to be explained along the test logs below TODO-A: - The package does have not failing autopkgtests right now TODO-B: - The package does have failing autopkgtests tests right now, but since TODO-B: they always failed they are handled as "ignored failure", this is TODO-B: ok because TBD RULE: - If no build tests nor autopkgtests are included, and/or if the package RULE: requires specific hardware to perform testing, the subscribed team RULE: must provide a written test plan in a comment to the MIR bug, and RULE: commit to running that test either at each upload of the package or RULE: at least once each release cycle. In the comment to the MIR bug, RULE: please link to the codebase of these tests (scripts or doc of manual RULE: steps) and attach a full log of these test runs. This is meant to RULE: assess their validity (e.g. not just superficial). RULE: If possible such things should stay in universe. Sometimes that is RULE: impossible due to the way how features/plugins/dependencies work RULE: but if you are going to ask for promotion of something untestable RULE: please outline why it couldn't provide its value (e.g. by splitting RULE: binaries) to users from universe. RULE: This is a balance that is hard to strike well, the request is that all RULE: options have been exploited before giving up. Look for more details RULE: and backgrounds https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues/30 RULE: Just like in the SRU process it is worth to understand what the RULE: consequences a regression (due to a test miss) would be. Therefore RULE: if being untestable we ask to outline what consequences this would RULE: have for the given package.
[Bug 2061754] Re: nullboot 0.5.1
** Tags removed: block-proposed ** Tags added: jammy noble upgrade-software-version ** Tags added: focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061754 Title: nullboot 0.5.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nullboot/+bug/2061754/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066193] Re: jhbuild cannot be installed in noble
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1054720 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054720 ** Also affects: jhbuild (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054720 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066193 Title: jhbuild cannot be installed in noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jhbuild/+bug/2066193/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065902] Re: libkkc FTBFS on noble: can't resolve libraries to shared libraries: m
** No longer affects: libkkc (Ubuntu Oracular) ** No longer affects: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu Oracular) ** No longer affects: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu Noble) ** Also affects: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: libkkc (Ubuntu Noble) ** Also affects: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: libkkc (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Changed in: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: libkkc (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1071116 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071116 ** Also affects: libkkc (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071116 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065902 Title: libkkc FTBFS on noble: can't resolve libraries to shared libraries: m To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gobject-introspection/+bug/2065902/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065587] Re: Add explicit dependency on glib 2.80 to ease upgrades 22.04 → 24.04
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Triaged ** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065587 Title: Add explicit dependency on glib 2.80 to ease upgrades 22.04 → 24.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2065587/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065669] Re: Update osinfo-db to 0.20240510
** Description changed:
Impact
==
The purpose of osinfo-db is to provide a database of guest operating systems
for use by virtualization provisioning tools using the libosinfo library. The
two primary users are the GNOME Boxes and Virt Manager apps.
This SRU updates the database to the latest release.
It also includes patches to
- Update Ubuntu 24.04 LTS for the stable release
- EOL changes for Ubuntu 23.04
- Add Ubuntu 24.10 as prerelease so that 24.10 ISOs are recognized (although
it won't be suggested for download by GNOME Boxes)
Test Case 0
===
osinfo-db has an extensive test suite to validate the data files. If the test
suite fails, it will fail the build. These tests are also run as autopkgtests.
Ensure the build succeeds and the autopkgtest passes
Test Case 1
===
1. Install the update
2. Open a terminal and run
sudo apt install gnome-boxes
3. Run gnome-boxes
4. Click + then press "Download an operating system" (The UI varies depending
on the version of gnome-boxes).
5. Select Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x86_64 (Live)
6. The ISO will download to your Downloads folder
7. When it completes, the wizard will prompt you to create a Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
virtual machine.
Complete the wizard.
8. The virtual machine should start. Finish installing Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
inside. Afterwards, restart and log into the Ubuntu 24.04 LTS virtual machine.
9. Open a terminal and run this command: cat /etc/os-release to verify that
you are using Ubuntu 24.04 LTS.
10. Afterwards, you can power off the virtual machine.
Test Case 2
===
From a terminal, run
osinfo-query os vendor="Canonical Ltd"
Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, Ubuntu 22.10, Ubuntu 23.04, and Ubuntu 23.10 should be
included in the list.
Where problems could occur
==
It is always possible to use ISOs not recognized by osinfo-db with either
GNOME Boxes or Virt Manager. osinfo-db provides useful metadata like
recommended RAM, recommended hard disk size, and what virtualized hardware
interfaces are supported.
This update significantly improves the ability of those apps to
recognize distros released in the first half of 2024, while also
updating some metadata details for older releases.
The most likely possible problem is that some download links may no
longer work. However, we know that the Ubuntu 23.04 download links were
broken before this update and 24.04 LTS was marked as pre-release so in
general download links will be better with this update.
+
+ Other Info
+ ==
+ I am not preparing an SRU for Ubuntu 23.10 because it will be End of Life
soon and we encourage its users to switch to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. I expect that by
the time this SRU reaches jammy-updates that meta-release will be updated to
point to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. Therefore, anyone who gets this update on Ubuntu
22.04 LTS ("Jammy") will be prompted to upgrade to 24.04 LTS not 23.10 and
24.04 LTS will have a newer version than 22.04 LTS.
+
+ Even if that doesn't happen, this is a data package, not a security-
+ sensitive package.
** Changed in: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Mantic)
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065669
Title:
Update osinfo-db to 0.20240510
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/osinfo-db/+bug/2065669/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059509] Re: Run build tests as autopkgtests
** Changed in: msgraph (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059509 Title: Run build tests as autopkgtests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msgraph/+bug/2059509/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065669] [NEW] Update osinfo-db to 0.20240510
Public bug reported: Impact == The purpose of osinfo-db is to provide a database of guest operating systems for use by virtualization provisioning tools using the libosinfo library. The two primary users are the GNOME Boxes and Virt Manager apps. This SRU updates the database to the latest release. It also includes patches to - Update Ubuntu 24.04 LTS for the stable release - EOL changes for Ubuntu 23.04 - Add Ubuntu 24.10 as prerelease so that 24.10 ISOs are recognized (although it won't be suggested for download by GNOME Boxes) Test Case 0 === osinfo-db has an extensive test suite to validate the data files. If the test suite fails, it will fail the build. These tests are also run as autopkgtests. Ensure the build succeeds and the autopkgtest passes Test Case 1 === 1. Install the update 2. Open a terminal and run sudo apt install gnome-boxes 3. Run gnome-boxes 4. Click + then press "Download an operating system" (The UI varies depending on the version of gnome-boxes). 5. Select Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x86_64 (Live) 6. The ISO will download to your Downloads folder 7. When it completes, the wizard will prompt you to create a Ubuntu 24.04 LTS virtual machine. Complete the wizard. 8. The virtual machine should start. Finish installing Ubuntu 24.04 LTS inside. Afterwards, restart and log into the Ubuntu 24.04 LTS virtual machine. 9. Open a terminal and run this command: cat /etc/os-release to verify that you are using Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. 10. Afterwards, you can power off the virtual machine. Test Case 2 === From a terminal, run osinfo-query os vendor="Canonical Ltd" Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, Ubuntu 22.10, Ubuntu 23.04, and Ubuntu 23.10 should be included in the list. Where problems could occur == It is always possible to use ISOs not recognized by osinfo-db with either GNOME Boxes or Virt Manager. osinfo-db provides useful metadata like recommended RAM, recommended hard disk size, and what virtualized hardware interfaces are supported. This update significantly improves the ability of those apps to recognize distros released in the first half of 2024, while also updating some metadata details for older releases. The most likely possible problem is that some download links may no longer work. However, we know that the Ubuntu 23.04 download links were broken before this update and 24.04 LTS was marked as pre-release so in general download links will be better with this update. ** Affects: osinfo-db (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: Fix Committed ** Affects: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Medium Status: Triaged ** Affects: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Medium Status: Triaged ** Affects: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Medium Status: Triaged ** Tags: jammy mantic noble ** Also affects: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065669 Title: Update osinfo-db to 0.20240510 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/osinfo-db/+bug/2065669/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065587] Re: Add explicit dependency on glib 2.80 to ease upgrades 22.04 → 24.04
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Also affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065587 Title: Add explicit dependency on glib 2.80 to ease upgrades 22.04 → 24.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2065587/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065587] [NEW] Add explicit dependency on glib 2.80 to ease upgrades 22.04 → 24.04
Public bug reported: Impact -- It was detected that something could cause GNOME Shell to crash during the upgrade from Ubuntu 22.04 LTS to 24.04 LTS. GNOME Shell then was unable to start because it wasn't able to locate the gio 2.0 gir files. Therefore, we are bumping the minimum version of the gir1.2-glib-2.0 dependency to 2.80 so that gnome-shell is not upgraded before the gir file it depends on. Test Case - What Could Go Wrong --- Other Info -- There was a major reorganization in glib 2.80 compared to glib 2.78. The gir file is now built by the glib2.0 source package instead of from gobject-introspection which bumped the package version from 1.78 to 2.78. ** Affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: In Progress ** Tags: noble ** Description changed: Impact -- It was detected that something could cause GNOME Shell to crash during the upgrade from Ubuntu 22.04 LTS to 24.04 LTS. GNOME Shell then was unable to start because it wasn't able to locate the gio 2.0 gir files. Therefore, we are bumping the minimum version of the gir1.2-glib-2.0 dependency to 2.80 so that gnome-shell is not upgraded before the gir file it depends on. Test Case - What Could Go Wrong --- Other Info -- - There was a major reorganization in glib 2.80 compared to glib 2.78. + There was a major reorganization in glib 2.80 compared to glib 2.78. The gir file is now built by the glib2.0 source package instead of from gobject-introspection which bumped the package version from 1.78 to 2.78. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065587 Title: Add explicit dependency on glib 2.80 to ease upgrades 22.04 → 24.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2065587/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1999480] Re: ubuntu-unity-desktop metapackage requires pulseaudio
Steve, Brian, and I aren't the true maintainers of Ubuntu Unity. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1999480 Title: ubuntu-unity-desktop metapackage requires pulseaudio To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-sound/+bug/1999480/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065361] Re: Create a vanilla Ubuntu flavour without snaps like Debian
Disadvantages - A desktop flavor of Ubuntu practically needs to install a web browser. The only browsers supported by the Ubuntu Security Team are Firefox and Chromium, both distributed only as Snaps in Ubuntu. Also, an increasing number of Ubuntu apps are built with Flutter and Flutter apps are only distributed as Snaps. This includes the upcoming Ubuntu Security Center app. The Ubuntu desktop installer is one of those Flutter apps. etc. Anyway, the Ubuntu Desktop team has no plan to build a version of Ubuntu Desktop without snaps so I'm closing this bug since it will not be fixed in "ubuntu-meta". I don't think this proposal is practical because of the browser issue, but if it were to be done, I am guessing it would be a community flavor. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RecognizedFlavors ** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065361 Title: Create a vanilla Ubuntu flavour without snaps like Debian To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/2065361/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061744] Re: Evolution crashes on launch: libevolution-rss-common.so: cannot open shared object file
** Also affects: evolution (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apparmor (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: apparmor (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: apparmor (Ubuntu Noble) ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1070833 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070833 ** Also affects: evolution (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070833 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061744 Title: Evolution crashes on launch: libevolution-rss-common.so: cannot open shared object file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/2061744/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061744] Re: Evolution crashes on launch: libevolution-rss-common.so: cannot open shared object file
** Summary changed: - Evolution crashes on launch: libevolution-rss-common.so: bwrap Creating new namespace failed: Permission denied + Evolution crashes on launch: libevolution-rss-common.so: cannot open shared object file -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061744 Title: Evolution crashes on launch: libevolution-rss-common.so: cannot open shared object file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2061744/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063221] Re: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package
I changed it back for you. There is more documentation about what those bug statuses mean for Stable Release Updates at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063221 Title: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/2063221/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065097] Re: Sync libjs-jquery-hotkeys 0~20130707+git2d51e3a9+dfsg-2.1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
This bug was fixed in the package libjs-jquery-hotkeys - 0~20130707+git2d51e3a9+dfsg-2.1 Sponsored for Zixing Liu (liushuyu-011) --- libjs-jquery-hotkeys (0~20130707+git2d51e3a9+dfsg-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium * Non maintainer upload by the Reproducible Builds team. * No source change upload to rebuild on buildd with .buildinfo files. -- Holger Levsen Mon, 28 Dec 2020 13:14:38 +0100 ** Changed in: libjs-jquery-hotkeys (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065097 Title: Sync libjs-jquery-hotkeys 0~20130707+git2d51e3a9+dfsg-2.1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libjs-jquery-hotkeys/+bug/2065097/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063221] Re: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063221 Title: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/2063221/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065042] [NEW] Please blocklist gnome-shell-extension-blur-my-shell
Public bug reported: Please remove and blocklist gnome-shell-extension-blur-my-shell The only GNOME Shell extensions in Ubuntu are those required for the default install or maintained by GNOME or are bundled with an app or service. https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/removal-of-gnome-shell-extension-from- universe-and-stop-auto-syncs/18437/9 ** Affects: gnome-shell-extension-blur-my-shell (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: block-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065042 Title: Please blocklist gnome-shell-extension-blur-my-shell To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-blur-my-shell/+bug/2065042/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061744] Re: Evolution crashes on launch: libevolution-rss-common.so: Creating new namespace failed: Permission denied
** Summary changed: - Evolution crashes on launch with a missing library: /usr/lib/evolution-data-server/camel-providers/libcamelrss.so + Evolution crashes on launch: libevolution-rss-common.so: Creating new namespace failed: Permission denied ** Summary changed: - Evolution crashes on launch: libevolution-rss-common.so: Creating new namespace failed: Permission denied + Evolution crashes on launch: libevolution-rss-common.so: bwrap Creating new namespace failed: Permission denied ** Also affects: apparmor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: apparmor (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: apparmor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061744 Title: Evolution crashes on launch: libevolution-rss-common.so: bwrap Creating new namespace failed: Permission denied To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2061744/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063333] Re: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process
Fixing this issue is a bit more complicated so we're still working through how to do it correctly: https://bugs.debian.org/1070473 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1070473 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070473 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206 Title: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/206/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063333] Re: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process
** Changed in: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206 Title: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/206/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063333] Re: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process
** Description changed:
Impact
--
GNOME Remote Desktop won't work for systems that were upgraded from earlier
Ubuntu releases.
Test Case
-
Install Ubuntu Desktop 23.10
Upgrade to 24.04 LTS
Successfully complete both the Basic RDP and Basic Remote Login test cases
from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/RemoteDesktop
What Could Go Wrong
---
The small debian/rules change ensures that systemd-sysusers is run and that
it is run after systemd-tmpfiles.
Both systemd-* commands are limited to only run the gnome-remote-desktop
conf files.
The conffiles simply create the gnome-remote-desktop user with an
appropriate user directory and ensure the existence of /etc/gnome-
remote-desktop/
This is the minimal change needed to fix this bug.
GNOME Remote Desktop only works with GNOME Shell so this change only
affects Ubuntu Desktop and Edubuntu. This change has no effect on new
Ubuntu 24.04 LTS installs because the user and user directory are
already created by the installer. It enables remote desktop to work for
systems that upgrade to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. Remote desktop can be a
critical feature for some users who may not have local access to the
system they are trying to use. However, this feature is a bit less
useful before Ubuntu 24.04 LTS which is the first version to support
headless remote desktop using RDP.
Other Info
--
The added lines to postinst are marked with a leading +:
# Automatically added by dh_installtmpfiles/13.15.3
if [ "$1" = "configure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-upgrade" ] || [ "$1" =
"abort-deconfigure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-remove" ] ; then
if [ -x "$(command -v systemd-tmpfiles)" ]; then
systemd-tmpfiles ${DPKG_ROOT:+--root="$DPKG_ROOT"} --create
gnome-remote-desktop-tmpfiles.conf || true
fi
fi
# End automatically added section
+# Automatically added by dh_installsysusers/13.15.3
+if [ "$1" = "configure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-upgrade" ] || [ "$1" =
"abort-+deconfigure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-remove" ] ; then
+ systemd-sysusers ${DPKG_ROOT:+--root="$DPKG_ROOT"}
gnome-remote-desktop-sysusers.conf
+fi
+ +
+# End automatically added section
+ +# Automatically added by dh_installtmpfiles/13.15.3
+ +if [ "$1" = "configure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-upgrade" ] || [ "$1" =
"abort-deconfigure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-remove" ] ; then
+ + if [ -x "$(command -v systemd-tmpfiles)" ]; then
+ + systemd-tmpfiles ${DPKG_ROOT:+--root="$DPKG_ROOT"} --create
+ +gnome-remote-desktop-tmpfiles.conf || true
+ + fi
+ +fi
+ +# End automatically added section
+
# Automatically added by dh_installsystemduser/13.15.3
if [ "$1" = "configure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-upgrade" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-
deconfigure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-remove" ] ; then
if [ -z "${DPKG_ROOT:-}" ]; then
if deb-systemd-helper --user debian-installed
'gnome-remote-desktop-handover.service' ; then
# The following line should be removed in trixie or
trixie+1
deb-systemd-helper --user unmask 'gnome-remote-desktop-handover.service'
>/dev/null || true
Workaround
--
- If you are affected by this issue, you can safely run the same 2 commands
that this upgrade would run:
+ If you are affected by this issue, you can safely run the same 3 commands
that this upgrade would run:
sudo systemd-tmpfiles --create /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/gnome-remote-desktop-
tmpfiles.conf
sudo systemd-sysusers /usr/lib/sysusers.d/gnome-remote-desktop-
sysusers.conf
+
+ sudo systemd-tmpfiles --create /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/gnome-remote-desktop-
+ tmpfiles.conf
+
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: gnome-remote-desktop 46.1-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-31.31.1-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-31-generic riscv64
ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: riscv64
CasperMD5json:
{
"result": "skip"
}
Date: Wed Apr 24 12:34:26 2024
InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-04-24 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Release riscv64
(20240423)
SourcePackage: gnome-remote-desktop
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206
Title:
gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No
such process
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/206/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063333] Re: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process
are
+ already created by the installer. It enables remote desktop to work for
+ systems that upgrade to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. Remote desktop can be a
+ critical feature for some users who may not have local access to the
+ system they are trying to use. However, this feature is a bit less
+ useful before Ubuntu 24.04 LTS which is the first version to support
+ headless remote desktop using RDP.
+
+ Other Info
+ --
+ The added lines to postinst are marked with a leading +:
+
+ # Automatically added by dh_installtmpfiles/13.15.3
+ if [ "$1" = "configure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-upgrade" ] || [ "$1" =
"abort-deconfigure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-remove" ] ; then
+ if [ -x "$(command -v systemd-tmpfiles)" ]; then
+ systemd-tmpfiles ${DPKG_ROOT:+--root="$DPKG_ROOT"} --create
+ gnome-remote-desktop-tmpfiles.conf || true
+ fi
+ fi
+ # End automatically added section
+ +# Automatically added by dh_installsysusers/13.15.3
+ +if [ "$1" = "configure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-upgrade" ] || [ "$1" =
"abort-+deconfigure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-remove" ] ; then
+ + systemd-sysusers ${DPKG_ROOT:+--root="$DPKG_ROOT"}
gnome-remote-desktop-sysusers.conf
+ +fi
+ +# End automatically added section
+ # Automatically added by dh_installsystemduser/13.15.3
+ if [ "$1" = "configure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-upgrade" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-
deconfigure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-remove" ] ; then
+ if [ -z "${DPKG_ROOT:-}" ]; then
+ if deb-systemd-helper --user debian-installed
'gnome-remote-desktop-handover.service' ; then
+ # The following line should be removed in trixie or
+ trixie+1
+ deb-systemd-helper --user unmask
'gnome-remote-desktop-handover.service' >/dev/null || true
+
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: gnome-remote-desktop 46.1-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-31.31.1-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-31-generic riscv64
ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: riscv64
CasperMD5json:
- {
-"result": "skip"
- }
+ {
+ "result": "skip"
+ }
Date: Wed Apr 24 12:34:26 2024
InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-04-24 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Release riscv64
(20240423)
SourcePackage: gnome-remote-desktop
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
** Changed in: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jeremy Bícha (jbicha)
** Description changed:
Impact
--
GNOME Remote Desktop won't work for systems that were upgraded from earlier
Ubuntu releases.
Test Case
-
Install Ubuntu Desktop 23.10
Upgrade to 24.04 LTS
Successfully complete both the Basic RDP and Basic Remote Login test cases
from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/RemoteDesktop
What Could Go Wrong
---
The small debian/rules change ensures that systemd-sysusers is run and that
it is run after systemd-tmpfiles.
Both systemd-* commands are limited to only run the gnome-remote-desktop
conf files.
The conffiles simply create the gnome-remote-desktop user with an
appropriate user directory and ensure the existence of /etc/gnome-
remote-desktop/
This is the minimal change needed to fix this bug.
GNOME Remote Desktop only works with GNOME Shell so this change only
affects Ubuntu Desktop and Edubuntu. This change has no effect on new
Ubuntu 24.04 LTS installs because the user and user directory are
already created by the installer. It enables remote desktop to work for
systems that upgrade to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. Remote desktop can be a
critical feature for some users who may not have local access to the
system they are trying to use. However, this feature is a bit less
useful before Ubuntu 24.04 LTS which is the first version to support
headless remote desktop using RDP.
Other Info
--
The added lines to postinst are marked with a leading +:
- # Automatically added by dh_installtmpfiles/13.15.3
- if [ "$1" = "configure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-upgrade" ] || [ "$1" =
"abort-deconfigure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-remove" ] ; then
- if [ -x "$(command -v systemd-tmpfiles)" ]; then
- systemd-tmpfiles ${DPKG_ROOT:+--root="$DPKG_ROOT"} --create
- gnome-remote-desktop-tmpfiles.conf || true
- fi
- fi
- # End automatically added section
+ # Automatically added by dh_installtmpfiles/13.15.3
+ if [ "$1" = "configure" ] || [ "$1" = "
[Bug 2063333] Re: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process
** Tags added: block-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206 Title: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/206/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063333] Re: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process
** Also affects: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206 Title: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/206/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056767] Re: FFe: Sync gnome-software 46.0-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) with gnome-software packaging split
** Also affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056767 Title: FFe: Sync gnome-software 46.0-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) with gnome-software packaging split To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/2056767/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061269] Re: Alacritty panics on startup
I successfully completed the test case with alacritty 0.13.2-1ubuntu1 on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-noble ** Summary changed: - Alacritty panics on startup + Alacritty panics on startup when used on Wayland -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061269 Title: Alacritty panics on startup when used on Wayland To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rust-alacritty/+bug/2061269/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062177] Re: Remmina crashes after RDP connection
This was fixed in oracular via https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/remmina/1.4.35+dfsg-2 ** Changed in: remmina (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062177 Title: Remmina crashes after RDP connection To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/remmina/+bug/2062177/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2016699] Re: elementpath breaks python-xmlschema autopkgtest: 'XMLSchemaContext' object has no attribute 'iter'
Fixed in oracular after autosyncs: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/p/python- xmlschema/oracular/ppc64el ** Changed in: python-xmlschema (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: elementpath (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2016699 Title: elementpath breaks python-xmlschema autopkgtest: 'XMLSchemaContext' object has no attribute 'iter' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elementpath/+bug/2016699/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059172] Re: autopkgtest failure with perl/5.38.2-3.2
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libcairo-gobject-perl ** Changed in: perl (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: perl (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059172 Title: autopkgtest failure with perl/5.38.2-3.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/perl/+bug/2059172/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064647] Re: Documentation for how to enable gnome-remote-desktop on a completly headless system
Ok, so we also need to run sudo systemd-tmpfiles when we fix https://launchpad.net/bugs/206 You can run that. I don't know if that will be enough to fix your issue though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064647 Title: Documentation for how to enable gnome-remote-desktop on a completly headless system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/2064647/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064762] [NEW] Update gnome-control-center to 46.1
Public bug reported: Impact -- There was a new bugfix release in the stable 46 series. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/compare/46.0...46.1 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/releases/46.1 Test Case 1 --- Install the update. Make sure that gnome-control-center continues to run well. Test Case 2 --- Install gnome-session Log out. Click your name on the login screen. Click the gear in the bottom right corner and choose GNOME. Finish logging in. Make sure that gnome-control-center continues to run well. This test case is because some of our Ubuntu customizations only show in the Ubuntu session, not other sessions like vanilla GNOME. Test Case 3 --- Open gnome-control-center Click the last item in the left sidebar named About Click Device Name. Type in a different name for your computer. Press Enter. The Rename Device dialog should close and your new computer name should take effect. What Could Go Wrong --- gnome-control-center is used by Ubuntu Desktop and Edubuntu. It is a critical app for viewing and changing a huge variety of settings for these desktops. gnome-control-center is part of GNOME Core and has a microrelease exception for Ubuntu stable release updates. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/GNOME ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Fix Committed ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Tags: noble upgrade-software-version ** Also affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064762 Title: Update gnome-control-center to 46.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/2064762/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064735] [NEW] Update mutter to 46.1
Public bug reported: I am not working on this SRU but I'm filing this in case someone else works on it later. Impact -- There is a new bugfix release in the stable 46 series. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/blob/46.1/NEWS Test Case - Complete the test case from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/Mutter What Could Go Wrong --- Mutter is an essential component of the default Ubuntu desktop and for the desktop used by Ubuntu Budgie. A severe enough bug could mean that people are unable to use their desktop version of Ubuntu. Smaller bugs could interrupt people's workflows. mutter is part of GNOME Core and is included in the GNOME micro release exception https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/GNOME Other Info -- ** Affects: mutter (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Fix Committed ** Affects: mutter (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Tags: noble upgrade-software-version ** Tags added: upgrade-software-version ** Also affects: mutter (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064735 Title: Update mutter to 46.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2064735/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064732] [NEW] Update xdg-desktop-portal-gnome to 46.1
Public bug reported: I'm not working on this SRU now but I'm filing this stub in case someone wants to work on it later. Impact -- There is a new bugfix release in the stable 46.x series. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/xdg-desktop-portal-gnome/-/blob/46.1/NEWS https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/xdg-desktop-portal-gnome/-/compare/46.0...46.1 Test Plan - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/XdgDesktopPortalGnome What Could Go Wrong --- xdg-desktop-portal-gnome is critical functionality for Snaps and Flatpaks including providing the file chooser dialogs for both of the only security supported web browsers in Ubuntu: firefox and chromium (both as snaps) xdg-desktop-portal-gnome is shipped only by Ubuntu Desktop (and Edubuntu). xdg-desktop-portal-gnome is also used in some apps that are distributed as .deb packages, for instance it is used for the Set as Background feature in the Nautilus file browser. ** Affects: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Fix Committed ** Affects: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Tags: noble upgrade-software-version ** Also affects: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064732 Title: Update xdg-desktop-portal-gnome to 46.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-desktop-portal-gnome/+bug/2064732/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2030909] Re: libsqlite3-0-dbgsym depends on 3.37.2-2 but the repos only contain 3.37.2-2ubuntu0.1
This appears to be up-to-date now. libsqlite3-0-dbgsym_3.37.2-2ubuntu0.3_amd64.ddeb is available at http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/pool/main/s/sqlite3/ which matches the version of the library available in the regular archives for Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. ** Changed in: sqlite3 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2030909 Title: libsqlite3-0-dbgsym depends on 3.37.2-2 but the repos only contain 3.37.2-2ubuntu0.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sqlite3/+bug/2030909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063447] Re: netavark fails to build
This SRU is currently blocked because the update fails to build on ppc64el. There's an issue with the vendored rustix dependency: error: could not find native static library `rustix_outline_powerpc64` One way to handle this would be to attempt partial vendoring of only the specific Rust crates we need to bypass the rust-zbus unavailability issue. I don't have experience with partial vendoring yet. But it's been done for qwertone and will probably be done for squeekboard soon. ** Also affects: netavark (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: netavark (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: netavark (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High ** Tags added: block-proposed-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063447 Title: netavark fails to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netavark/+bug/2063447/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064643] Re: 46.1 stable update
** Also affects: nautilus (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastien Bacher (seb128) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064643 Title: 46.1 stable update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2064643/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062394] Re: Update xdg-desktop-portal to 1.18.4
** Description changed: - This includes part of a CVE security fix; the more important part of the - CVE is in flatpak but there is some hardening on the xdg-desktop-portal - side. + Impact + -- + This includes part of a CVE security fix; the more important part of the CVE is in flatpak but there is some hardening on the xdg-desktop-portal side. https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-desktop-portal/releases/tag/1.18.4 https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-desktop-portal/compare/1.18.3...1.18.4 + + Test Plan + - + Run the tests from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/XdgDesktopPortalGnome + + What Could Go Wrong + -- + xdg-desktop-portal is critical functionality for Snaps and Flatpaks including providing the file chooser dialogs for both of the only security supported web browsers in Ubuntu: firefox and chromium (both as snaps) + + xdg-desktop-portal is included in every official Ubuntu desktop flavor + as it has become essential functionality for modern desktops. When used + by desktops, there is a separate backend package to provide the UI. For + Ubuntu Desktop, this is xdg-desktop-portal-gnome. Several other desktops + use xdg-desktop-portal-gtk (even Ubuntu Desktop uses it as a dependency + of -gnome) but there are other backends that follow the standard naming + convention xdg-desktop-portal-* + + xdg-desktop-portal also is used in some apps that are distributed as + .deb packages, for instance it is used for the Set as Background feature + in the Nautilus file browser. + + Other Info + -- + (none) ** Description changed: Impact -- - This includes part of a CVE security fix; the more important part of the CVE is in flatpak but there is some hardening on the xdg-desktop-portal side. + This is a new release in the stable 1.18.x series. It includes part of a CVE security fix; the more important part of the CVE is in flatpak but there is some hardening on the xdg-desktop-portal side. https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-desktop-portal/releases/tag/1.18.4 https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-desktop-portal/compare/1.18.3...1.18.4 Test Plan - Run the tests from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/XdgDesktopPortalGnome What Could Go Wrong -- xdg-desktop-portal is critical functionality for Snaps and Flatpaks including providing the file chooser dialogs for both of the only security supported web browsers in Ubuntu: firefox and chromium (both as snaps) xdg-desktop-portal is included in every official Ubuntu desktop flavor as it has become essential functionality for modern desktops. When used by desktops, there is a separate backend package to provide the UI. For Ubuntu Desktop, this is xdg-desktop-portal-gnome. Several other desktops use xdg-desktop-portal-gtk (even Ubuntu Desktop uses it as a dependency of -gnome) but there are other backends that follow the standard naming convention xdg-desktop-portal-* xdg-desktop-portal also is used in some apps that are distributed as .deb packages, for instance it is used for the Set as Background feature in the Nautilus file browser. Other Info -- (none) ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2024-32462 ** Also affects: xdg-desktop-portal (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: xdg-desktop-portal (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: xdg-desktop-portal (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: xdg-desktop-portal (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062394 Title: Update xdg-desktop-portal to 1.18.4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-desktop-portal/+bug/2062394/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064647] Re: Documentation for how to enable gnome-remote-desktop on a completly headless system
Are you able to file this issue upstream also? https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-remote-desktop/-/issues There is also the grdctrl command, but I don't see enough detail in its manpage to solve your request. ** Changed in: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064647 Title: Documentation for how to enable gnome-remote-desktop on a completly headless system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/2064647/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063333] Re: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process
There is some initial configuration you should do in the GNOME Settings app (gnome-control-center) > System > Remote Desktop > Remote Login before you can later use your computer headless via RDP. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206 Title: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/206/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063333] Re: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process
Robert, do things work if you log out and log back in without trying to invoke gnome-remote-desktop manually? ** Changed in: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206 Title: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/206/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
