[Bug 1905623] Re: df: /run/user/1000/doc: Operation not permitted
I was referring to Julian comment which stated df can't ignore this. If you don't want to this fuse fs to be created then either remove xdg- desktop-portal package or mask xdg-document-portal.service with: systemctl --user mask xdg-document-portal.service -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905623 Title: df: /run/user/1000/doc: Operation not permitted To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-desktop-portal/+bug/1905623/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1905623] Re: df: /run/user/1000/doc: Operation not permitted
You can silence this with "df -x fuse.portal" xdg-desktop-portal isn't tied to flatpak. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905623 Title: df: /run/user/1000/doc: Operation not permitted To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-desktop-portal/+bug/1905623/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1865282] Re: Snap chromium - apparmor pulseAudio (and other) error messages (20.04)
As I said file dialog denials are unsolvable unless snap adopts xdg- desktop-portal but afaik chromium doesn't support it anyway. When you open file dialog it will iterate over files in current dir and most of them shouldn't be allowed but they also can't be explicitly denied. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1865282 Title: Snap chromium - apparmor pulseAudio (and other) error messages (20.04) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor-profiles/+bug/1865282/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1865282] Re: Snap chromium - apparmor pulseAudio error message (20.04)
IIRC for /etc/pulse/client.conf.d/ you need to connect pulseaudio interface The spam of denials after you open file dialog is inevitable in snap, you may ignore it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1865282 Title: Snap chromium - apparmor pulseAudio error message (20.04) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor-profiles/+bug/1865282/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1864127] Re: apparmor denies ~/snap/chromium/ writes
Does it happen on every start or maybe it happened once during snap refresh? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864127 Title: apparmor denies ~/snap/chromium/ writes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1864127/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1862262] Re: [snap] apparmor denials on /sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/sys_vendor and product_name
The "denials on /sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/sys_vendor and product_name" will be fixed in next snapd release (2.43.4?): https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/commit/3ad3e7fbba13721eeaab8dd85a5640316b1c1606 The "ERROR:sandbox_linux.cc(374)] InitializeSandbox() called with multiple threads in process gpu-process." is known chromium bug which results in disabled gpu sandbox: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=264818 This isn't related to snap and the only fix for now is to set MESA_GLSL_CACHE_DISABLE=true environment variable. @walterav your issues seem unrelated to those. Please open separate report. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862262 Title: [snap] apparmor denials on /sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/sys_vendor and product_name To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1862262/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1862062] Re: [snap] Missing canberra-gtk-module?
This module is purely optional and lack of it doesn't cause any harm. You may ignore this message. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862062 Title: [snap] Missing canberra-gtk-module? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1862062/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1850893] Re: chromium-browser does not resolve any names
"chromium-browser/xenial-updates 78.0.3904.70-0ubuntu0.16.04.2 amd64 [upgradable from: 77.0.3865.120-0ubuntu1~snap1]" xenial is ubuntu 16.04. It seems that you have mixed repos from different ubuntu versions and chromium deb from older version overwrote version from 19.10. Kixing repos from different ubuntu versions isn't supported and you should fix this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850893 Title: chromium-browser does not resolve any names To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1850893/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847069] Re: [snap] Chromium snap starts slowly
"note that all snaps today actually use XZ compression, not LZMA." xz = LZMA2 ( https://tukaani.org/xz/ ) which I guess is what was referenced above. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847069 Title: [snap] Chromium snap starts slowly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1847069/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1850088] Re: permission denied when opening a mounted folder in save file dialog
It's not possible to install non-classic snap (like chromium) with --classic switch. You can get access to /media/$USER/ through removable-media interface which you have to manually connect to chromium snap. https://snapcraft.io/docs/removable-media-interface -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850088 Title: permission denied when opening a mounted folder in save file dialog To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1850088/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1837746] Re: [snap] wrapper script doesn't source ~/.chromium-browser.init
I can confirm that if "personal-files" slot isn't connected and "~/.chromium-browser.init" exist then chromium snap fails to start. The solution is to either connect "personal-files" slot or delete "~/.chromium-browser.init" (arguably it's pointless to have this file if access is blocked). @osomon you may also use something like: test -f $REALHOME/.chromium-browser.init && . $REALHOME/.chromium- browser.init || true which will ignore failure of sourcing ".chromium-browser.init" and let chromium start. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1837746 Title: [snap] wrapper script doesn't source ~/.chromium-browser.init To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1837746/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1850088] Re: permission denied when opening a mounted folder in save file dialog
The "proper fix" may never arrive because sandboxing is core feature of snaps and blocking access to dotfiles is inherent part of sandbox. So from snap perspective your workflow is invalid. There are two solutions: adjust your workflow or abandon chromium snap. It's up to you what you choose. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850088 Title: permission denied when opening a mounted folder in save file dialog To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1850088/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1850088] Re: permission denied when opening a mounted folder in save file dialog
Snaps don't have access to dotfiles in your home dir (anything in ~/.xxx). The solution for you is to use ~/server instead of ~/.server as mount point. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850088 Title: permission denied when opening a mounted folder in save file dialog To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1850088/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1832333] Re: There is no firejail-default profile in Ubuntu
The file clearly is inside deb pakckage, you can open it and see yourself. It it doesn't work the your system may be broken somewhat. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1832333 Title: There is no firejail-default profile in Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1832333/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1832333] Re: There is no firejail-default profile in Ubuntu
/etc/apparmor.d/local/firejail-default should be created by post-install firejail package hook. I recommend re-installing firejail package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1832333 Title: There is no firejail-default profile in Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1832333/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1832333] Re: There is no firejail-default profile in Ubuntu
/etc/apparmor.d/firejail-default is part of firejail package, see https://packages.ubuntu.com/disco/amd64/firejail/filelist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1832333 Title: There is no firejail-default profile in Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1832333/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1804841] Re: iwlwifi Microcode SW error detected. Restarting 0x2000000.
It may be the same as this issue reported upstream: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202513 ** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #202513 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202513 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804841 Title: iwlwifi Microcode SW error detected. Restarting 0x200. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1804841/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1691908] Re: fstab binds appear as mounts (x-gvfs-hide is being ignored)
This bug is fixed upstream. Can we get backport to bionic? https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/issues/1271#note_352412 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/merge_requests/365 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/merge_requests/366 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1691908 Title: fstab binds appear as mounts (x-gvfs-hide is being ignored) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glib/+bug/1691908/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1575053] Re: Please move the "$HOME/snap" directory to a less obtrusive location
@nemkin this "bug" touches core snap architecture. Fixing it will need a lot of work and at the end it's pure aesthetics. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575053 Title: Please move the "$HOME/snap" directory to a less obtrusive location To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1575053/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1799983] [NEW] Remove SUID bit from /usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome-sandbox
Public bug reported: Chromium can use two different techniques to sandbox itself: - SUID sandbox - User namespaces sandbox User namespaces sandbox is preferred way and SUID sandbox is considered as legacy. Debian have to use SUID sandbox because they disable unprivileged user namespaces but Ubuntu doesn't and in fact use User namespaces sandbox currently thus the SUID bit on /usr/lib/chromium- browser/chrome-sandbox is unnecessary and may be seen as liability from security perspective. Please consider removing SUID bit from /usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome- sandbox in Ubuntu packaging. ** Affects: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799983 Title: Remove SUID bit from /usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome-sandbox To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1799983/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1798967] [NEW] bubblewrap has wrong description after setuid bit was removed
Public bug reported: After setuid bit was removed from default installation in cosmic (and soon in bionic) the description doesn't match actual behavior anymore: "setuid wrapper for unprivileged chroot and namespace manipulation" ** Affects: bubblewrap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1798967 Title: bubblewrap has wrong description after setuid bit was removed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bubblewrap/+bug/1798967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1709164] Re: [MIR] bubblewrap
I just wanted to point out that after dropping setuid bit the package description is now wrong. "setuid wrapper for unprivileged chroot and namespace manipulation" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1709164 Title: [MIR] bubblewrap To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bubblewrap/+bug/1709164/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1796126] Re: Thunderbird is out of date for two months when Thunderbird 60 was released
To add to above: https://www.thunderbird.net/en- US/thunderbird/60.0/releasenotes/ > Thunderbird version 60.0 is only offered as direct download from thunderbird.net and not as upgrade from Thunderbird version 52 or earlier. A future version 60.1 will provide updates from earlier versions. This means until 60.2.1, upgrades from older versions weren't fully supported by upstream. Only now it changed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1796126 Title: Thunderbird is out of date for two months when Thunderbird 60 was released To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1796126/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1069357] Re: [Dell Vostro V131] Hardware keys change backlight brightness in much larger increments/steps than expected
I reinstall my OS, I can adjust brightness befor I user acpi_backlight=vendor. ** Attachment added: brightness_problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1069357/+attachment/3924735/+files/brightness_problem -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069357 Title: [Dell Vostro V131] Hardware keys change backlight brightness in much larger increments/steps than expected To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1069357/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1069357] Re: [Dell Vostro V131] Hardware keys change backlight brightness in much larger increments/steps than expected
After I user acpi_backlight=vendor, Brightness is 3 steps. ** Attachment added: brightness_3step https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1069357/+attachment/3924736/+files/brightness_3step -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069357 Title: [Dell Vostro V131] Hardware keys change backlight brightness in much larger increments/steps than expected To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1069357/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 954661] Re: backlight brightness not adjustable by default on Dell XPS 13
I have same problem on my Dell Latitude 3540 with Ubuntu 13.10. ** Attachment added: report https://bugs.launchpad.net/dell-sputnik/+bug/954661/+attachment/3923676/+files/report -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954661 Title: backlight brightness not adjustable by default on Dell XPS 13 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dell-sputnik/+bug/954661/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1069357] Re: [Dell Vostro V131] Hardware keys change backlight brightness in much larger increments/steps than expected
I have the same issue in Ubuntu 12.04.3. My laptop is Dell Latitude 3540. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069357 Title: [Dell Vostro V131] Hardware keys change backlight brightness in much larger increments/steps than expected To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1069357/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
