[Bug 188392] Re: mdam software raid fails to start up on reboot
Hey everyone, I was having this exact same problem.
At some point an older array was defined, and there were superblocks for
md left on one (or more) of the partitions. Even if I zeroed them out
(using sudo mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/sda1), the superblock came back
after a reboot! It was very strange. Regardless if the partitions were
of type linux or linux raid autodetect, I was getting the above
errors and problems as people have already described. However, if the
partitions were CLEARED completely, the above repeating error did not
occur.
SOLUTION FOR ME:
In the file: /etc/udev/rules.d/85-mdadm.rules
Comment out the only line:
SUBSYSTEM==block, ACTION==add|change, ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}==linux_raid*,
RUN+=watershed -i udev-mdadm /sbin/mdadm -As
It looks like for some weird reason, udev is trying to be helpful and
searching for all devices with md superblocks and assemble any array it
might find? Clearly this is useless because mdadm itself already does
this.
HENCE: It makes sense that we're getting the above error: md: array
md0 already has disks! (although I'm not sure why it happens over and
over again).
Anyways, this is what worked for me (thanks to RaceTM for help!)
Cheers - hopefully my details will help the developers implement this bug fix.
--
mdam software raid fails to start up on reboot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188392] Re: mdam software raid fails to start up on reboot
PS: Apparently an upgrade of mdadm will fix this also? (I haven't verified) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/139802 -- mdam software raid fails to start up on reboot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188392 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 198871] Re: Jmicron AHCI controller probs...
I'm experiencing the same issues with AHCI configured.
Running the Intel DG43NB with this JMicron controller card onboard ..:
{{{
$ lspci | grep JMicron
02:00.0 IDE interface: JMicron Technologies, Inc. JMB368 IDE controller
}}}
Running this kernel:
{{{
$ uname -a
Linux ubuntu-computer 2.6.24-23-server #1 SMP Mon Jan 26 00:55:21 UTC 2009 i686
GNU/Linux
}}}
When a HDD is plugged in:
{{{
ata4: irq_stat 0x00040, connection status changed
ata4: SError: { DevExch }
ata4: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x400 action 0xa frozen
ata4: irq_stat 0x00040, connection status changed
ata4: SError: {CommWake DevExch }
ata4: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x400 action 0xa frozen
}}}
... and repeat, over and over again.
If I remove the HDD drive, the errors stop.
Trying to configure the SATA controller as Native IDE ... no SATA
drives are detected.
---
How can I go about trying a newer kernel?
--
Jmicron AHCI controller probs...
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198871
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 198871] Re: Jmicron AHCI controller probs...
HA!
Fixed this problem. As per above I was running ubuntu hardy with kernel
2.6.24-23. Upgrading to the latest Intrepid stable kernel solved this
problem for me!
Here's what I did:
Add the Intrepid repository temporarily by appending the following to
/etc/apt/sources.list:
{{{
# Temporary Repositories to pull new Intrepid kernel
deb http://ca2.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu intrepid main restricted
deb-src http://ca2.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu intrepid main restricted
}}}
Update the repo cache:
{{{
sudo apt-get update
}}}
Determined what the latest repository was:
{{{
sudo aptitude search linux-headers-*
}}}
Learned it to be 2.6.27-7! ... so install it!
{{{
sudo apt-get install linux-backports-modules-2.6.27-7-generic
linux-headers-2.6.27-7 linux-headers-2.6.27-7-generic
linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic linux-restricted-modules-2.6.27-7-generic
linux-source-2.6.27 linux-doc-2.6.27
}}}
(notice I went overboard on WHAT to install ... because frankly I didn't know
what I did and did not require ...)
After a few minutes, the kernel was installed, and headers updated in
/boot/grub/menu.lst.
Restarted the server first (to make sure nothing blew up...).
Everything looked fine, so I shutdown the server. Installed a SATA
drive to the 82801JI (ICH10 Family) SATA AHCI Controller.
Here's an output (filtered) of sudo lspci -C Storage:
{{{
*-storage
description: SATA controller
product: 82801JI (ICH10 Family) SATA AHCI Controller
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 1f.2
bus info: p...@:00:1f.2
logical name: scsi3
version: 00
width: 32 bits
clock: 66MHz
capabilities: storage msi pm ahci_1.0 bus_master cap_list emulated
configuration: driver=ahci latency=0 module=ahci
}}}
No more errors! Looks like at some point in the kernel this issue was
fixed. Simply upgrade to a later distro, or upgrade your kernel, and
you should be fine.
PS: Don't forget to remove the temporary repo entries in
/etc/apt/sources.list and follow with an apt-get update.
--
Jmicron AHCI controller probs...
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198871
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 198871] Re: Jmicron AHCI controller probs...
How are you running 2.6.27-11? When I updated (yesterday), the latest in the repositories was 2.6.27-7 ... Perhaps consider trying to downgrade to 2.6.27-7? (I know downgrading sucks, but I only had access to -7 to try...) Original Message From: Foul foul...@free.fr Sent: Mon 02 Feb 2009 06:01:40 AM EST To: fermula...@sympatico.ca Subject: [Bug 198871] Re: Jmicron AHCI controller probs... i'm on Kubuntu 8.10 with Kernel 2.6.27-11 and the bug is always her for me :( -- Jmicron AHCI controller probs... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198871 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 247746] Re: winbind should be downgraded to Recommends
Agreed. This is a nuisance in hardy still. -- winbind should be downgraded to Recommends https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 344343] Re: Installation for theme name_of_the_theme failed. Can't move directory over directory
Confirmed ... sort of. This error (for me) occurs if the theme has already been installed. I was looking at the following themes from: http://www.junauza.com/2008/08/10-beautiful-themes-for-ubuntu- intrepid.html I downloaded the first three. Steps to reproduce. 1. System -- Preferences -- Appearance 2. Theme Tab 3. Click the Install ... button and open up the appropriate theme file (or drag the tar.bz2 file into the window). 4. At first, it says the theme was installed. (but the theme doesn't show up in the list!) 5. Try to install again, the error in subject line above is displayed. (Can't move directory over directory) manzur, what happens if you try a NEW theme? (Wondering if maybe the theme you're trying to install was somehow already installed, and so you're experiencing the same thing as I am in reality?) -- Installation for theme name_of_the_theme failed. Can't move directory over directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344343 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 314600] Re: fglrx versions newer than 8.543 cause system hang and panic
Apparently this is an incompatibilty from ATI (fglrx) with the latest xserver? The move from Ubuntu 8.04 to 8.10 has a newer version of xserver, which is incompatible with ATI's latest 9.3 Catalyst. The worst part is, that I just noticed that ATI recently announced the following cards as Legacy: ATI Radeon 9500 Series ATI Radeon 9550 Series ATI Radeon 9600 Series ATI Radeon 9700 Series ATI Radeon 9800 Series ATI Radeon X300 Series ATI Radeon X550 Series ATI Radeon X600 Series ATI Radeon X700 Series ATI Radeon X800 Series ATI Radeon X850 Series ATI Radeon X1050 Series ATI Radeon X1300 Series ATI Radeon X1550 Series ATI Radeon X1600 Series ATI Radeon X1650 Series ATI Radeon X1800 Series ATI Radeon X1900 Series ATI Radeon Xpress Series ATI Radeon X1200 Series ATI Radeon X1250 Series ATI Radeon X2100 Series Any of these above cards will not see a newer Linux driver release past Catalyst 9.3. Are we screwed? -- fglrx versions newer than 8.543 cause system hang and panic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314600 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261716] Re: window list goes blank with compiz
Confirmed. - Ubuntu 8.10 - ati/radeon x.org driver (primary CRT, secondary TV using xrandr commands) - compiz enabled (but I don't use grouping of windows) - don't use multiple desktops either, I've actually limited the workspace to one I did notice though that if you put the system to sleep (S3), and resume, the panel stops updating the window list until you killall gnome-panel. (Opening new windows, closing them ... nothing but killall gnome-panel seems to revive the updating window list) -- window list goes blank with compiz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261716 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 326878] Re: package sun-java6-jre 6-10-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
Same here. Clean Ubuntu Intrepid Install. -- package sun-java6-jre 6-10-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326878 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 42121] Re: Symlinks for umountnfs / sendsigs wrong: hang on shutdown / reboot
Confirmed. This bug still exists in the final release of Intrepid Ibex (8.10). Followed the helpful tips from: http://www.jejik.com/articles/2007/07/automatically_mounting_and_unmounting_samba_windows_shares_with_cifs/ to resolve. However, of course, this needs to be fixed in the main so that users need to apply this fix manually. -- Symlinks for umountnfs / sendsigs wrong: hang on shutdown / reboot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42121 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 307939] Re: Brasero fails to burn any kind of DVD
[QUOTE] DervishD wrote on 2009-06-25:#10 Exactly the same happened to me on my Jaunty when writing an ISO image into a DVD-R. I'm using brasero 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 on AMD64 arch. [/QUOTE] Dervish, did you report another bug? I'm getting th same thing on Ubuntu 9.10 x86. -- Brasero fails to burn any kind of DVD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307939 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 354995] Re: Brasero Checksum Error
If Brasero 2.28.2 works, can we allow the latest Brasero for Ubuntu 9.04 then? -- Brasero Checksum Error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354995 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 428884] Re: gnome-screensaver-command --poke no longer inhibits screensaver
I'd like to comment on perspective here. Ubuntu is supposed to be Linux for Humans. Something as stupid as breaking the inhibit functionality of the screensaver shouldn't take this long to fix. Since Ubuntu is very popular amongst multimedia centres, this is a pretty crucial feature for people. Suggestion: 1. Temporarily fix the bug NOW, (remove regression), and allow the patch to flow to Karmic users so that functionality returns. (i..e they shouldn't have to patch anything -- this should come upstream via apt) 2. Spend the time to figure out the right solution BEFORE breaking it. Once it's been agreed on the right solution, implement it, test it, and release it. Users don't care if gnome-screensaver wants to use a new API and media players aren't catching up. We can't expect people to actually adopt this OS if we're squabbling over stupid stuff like this. As soon as this bug was realised, the regression should have been removed, and once functionality was restored (the old way), then we can take the time to discuss the right way to fix it. I'm all for doing things right, but not at the expense of having a feature (that used to work) disappear from a new release for months... completely unacceptable. -- gnome-screensaver-command --poke no longer inhibits screensaver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428884 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 210472] Re: Timidity daemon doesn't play nice with pulse audio
I have tried what Daniel Ellis has suggested (very nice details!), and had the same results on Jaunty. -- Timidity daemon doesn't play nice with pulse audio https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 126618] Re: gnome-system-monitor does not display hd reads to fake-raid
To all who have confirmed this bug, please re-confirm at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=586853. I've submitted this bug to the gnome developers. ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #586853 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=586853 -- gnome-system-monitor does not display hd reads to fake-raid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/126618 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261716] Re: window list goes blank with compiz
Do we have any solid way to reproduce this bug? I've been using 9.04 for a while now, and for whatever reason the bug hasn't exposed itself for at least a month (maybe 2 .. since my post on 2009-04-21) -- window list goes blank with compiz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261716 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 381795] Re: tsclient should be upgraded to 2.0.1
I find the 0.150 version very slow when connecting to a system on a slower connection. I'd very much like to see Ubuntu updating it's repository copy of tsclient to the 2.0 series. (Indeed, Fedora has already done this.) As a side note, I tried to download the latest from sourceforge today and compile, but it complained about a LOT of missing packages, so this might be problematic. -- tsclient should be upgraded to 2.0.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137606] Re: an icon view for the fileselectors would be useful
This is still present in Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty... File Chooser should have image preview! -- an icon view for the fileselectors would be useful https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137606 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 379673] Re: Return from hibernation progress bar
Well, it should be for both! :-) ** Changed in: pm-utils (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Return from hibernation progress bar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379673 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 300935] Re: missing /etc/X11/rgb.txt file and broken link to it
Can we also please have this fix backported to Intrepid and Jaunty? It's pretty severe (clearly affecting many applications used by many Ubuntu users). -- missing /etc/X11/rgb.txt file and broken link to it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 42121] Re: Symlinks for umountnfs / sendsigs wrong: hang on shutdown / reboot
** Changed in: sysvinit (Debian) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed ** Changed in: sysvinit (Debian) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released ** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Symlinks for umountnfs / sendsigs wrong: hang on shutdown / reboot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42121 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Window Resize Difficult (Window Border Thickness)
So are we getting any closer to deciding an action to solve this problem?... What daniel wrote on 2009-06-22 seems like a very good compromise. But, it's more of a workaround than a solution. If theme writers don't employ the thick bottom border, then users still have to muck with it themselves. An accessibility option sounds like a very good idea. Where if the user moves the mouse cursor +/- 0.15% of the border, the cursor would either snap to border or be virtual border allowing the user to click and then snap to border. 0.15% Because: * 1024x768 -- +/- 2 1 pixels * 1280x1024 -- +/- 2 2 pixels * 1680x1050 -- +/- 3 2 pixels Right now I have my borders sized to 5 pixel thickness on a 1680x1050 resolution. This is a good size IMO to easily grab the border when you need to, and it doesn't look too thick. This allows a decent (but small enough to not be intrusive) desktop real estate area to be used for border catching. As resolution sizes increase, the number of pixels will also increase, scaling properly with the ever increasing resolution sizes. Of course, this option in accessibility options should be enabled by default, but anyone who finds it annoying can disable it if they like. The reason it should be enabled by default is for the obvious reason that normal users won't know to go there to enable it. This is a helpful default behaviour to make window management easier. -- Window Resize Difficult (Window Border Thickness) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Window Resize Difficult (Window Border Thickness)
NOTE: We must ensure the calculation of 0.15% is of the xrandr output, NOT the Virtual desktop size! -- Window Resize Difficult (Window Border Thickness) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 356031] Re: No acl tab in Jaunty
So: Headless system, administrators install only the acl package. They'll use of course getfacl and setfacl. This is I suppose out of scope as it doesn't affect our discussions here. On a real desktop system, ... if someone installs eiciel, the nautilus-actions package is required for nautilus integration, so it should be a dependency. Not just a recommended. Right? -- No acl tab in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356031 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 376223] Re: sun-java6-jre_6-10-0ubuntu2 failed to load
I confirm this happened for me also. The upgrade processes must not prompt for the acceptance of the license... -- sun-java6-jre_6-10-0ubuntu2 failed to load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190181] Re: New major upstream version (2.0.1)
So what, what's the deal with tsclient then? Is it already the latest version and the about box is invalid? .. or we're just waiting for the latest version to be available in the distro packages? -- New major upstream version (2.0.1) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190181 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 356031] Re: No acl tab in Jaunty
You make a point. Although I don't see the use case for eiciel as a standalone application. It's *almost* useless standalone ... but I suppose there's no sense in limiting people. So, then, a nautilus-eiciel package makes sense. It would basically be a dummy package that would REQUIRE eiciel and nautilus-actions to be installed. Right? -- No acl tab in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356031 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Window Resize Difficult (Window Border Thickness)
I concur with Jared. Also running Jaunty and I've tried various themes for Gnome including Human, New Wave, Dust, etc. All of these themes have different border sizes, and for aesthetics, many themes have a very thin border (1 pix). When the border is so thin, it's extremely difficult to naturally move your mouse cursor over that 1 pixel thickness. As per some discussion in the New Wave Gnome theme (https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371833), you can customize the border width as follows: I've edited my metacity-theme-1.xml (found in /usr/share/themes/New Wave/metacity-1) as follows: distance name=left_width value=5/ distance name=right_width value=5/ Again though, forcing users to have a thicker border to make resizing windows natural isn't the correct solution. Having an invisible thicker resize area would work, or perhaps a snap to border edge when you're within 5 or 10 pixels of the border. -- Window Resize Difficult (Window Border Thickness) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Window Resize Difficult (Window Border Thickness)
NOTE: This bug also applies to compiz, would a fix to metacity transfer to compiz? -- Window Resize Difficult (Window Border Thickness) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 126618] Re: gnome-system-monitor does not display hd reads to fake-raid
I can confirm this bug still exists on Ubuntu Jaunty, 9.04. Here are some filtered results from mount: ~$: mount /dev/sdc6 on /home type ext3 (rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,acl) /dev/mapper/isw_dihagdeiig_RAID03 on / type ext3 (rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro) /dev/mapper/isw_dihagdeiig_RAID07 on /mnt/storage type ext3 (rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,acl) /dev/mapper/isw_dihagdeiig_RAID01 on /mnt/windows_vista type fuseblk (rw,nosuid,nodev,allow_other,default_permission,blksize=4096) Basically the gnome-system-monitor applet can monitor hard disk activity. It monitors /dev/hd#, /dev/sd# (IDE SATA drives, USB Sticks, etc.) just fine. However, devices which exist in /dev/mapper (from the dmraid configuration) are not monitored for disk I/O activity, and they should be. In my particular example, the only disk which shows disk I/O in the applet is activity against my /home drive. The root filesystem resides on /dev/mapper/isw_dihagdeiig_RAID03, and it never shows I/O. If you require any additional information, I'd be more than pleased to provide. ** Changed in: gnome-system-monitor (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- gnome-system-monitor does not display hd reads to fake-raid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/126618 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 126618] Re: gnome-system-monitor does not display hd reads to fake-raid
NOTE: As per http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=7401844, can anyone confirm that this bug also applies to mdadm RAID devices? (/dev/md###) -- gnome-system-monitor does not display hd reads to fake-raid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/126618 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 751324] Re: wobbly windows behave erratically
Are there any workarounds? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/751324 Title: wobbly windows behave erratically To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/751324/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 751324] Re: wobbly windows behave erratically
To clarify, @nh2, I don't understand the workaround you've mentioned regarding shivering. Could you please clarify? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/751324 Title: wobbly windows behave erratically To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/751324/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 751324] Re: wobbly windows behave erratically
Ah, figured it out by trial and error. Workaround: 1. Effects -- Wobbly Windows -- 2. Disable the Maximize Effect -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/751324 Title: wobbly windows behave erratically To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/751324/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 315735] Re: FakeRAID fails with kernel 2.6.28
I'm still having the problem on * Ubuntu Jaunty 9.04: * RAID0 on Intel RAID Controller Boot: In busybox, must run dmraid -ay, exit, only then the system will boot. sudo lspci | grep Intel | grep RAID 00:1f.2 RAID bus controller: Intel Corporation 82801 SATA RAID Controller (rev 02) uname -a Linux 2.6.28-11-server -- FakeRAID fails with kernel 2.6.28 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315735 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 30942] Re: Request to add option to disable 'Recent Documents' lists.
+1 -- Request to add option to disable 'Recent Documents' lists. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30942 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 373519] [NEW] gnome-display-properties: Does the display look OK dialogue not in front
Public bug reported: Running: * ubuntu jaunty 9.04 (2.6.28-11-server) * Radeon Open Source Drivers (xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.12.1-0ubuntu2 X.Org X server -- ATI display driver wrapper) * Radeon X1950 Pro (r570) If I open the gnome-display-properties dialogue window, we're able to enable and disable the secondary/primary monitor. Whenever a change is made in the configuration (after pressing Apply) the confirmation dialogue box (http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/1039/82629207.png) does NOT jump to the foreground. It should. Instead it will almost always be at the very bottom of the window stack, buried behind all the other windows. If this isn't noticed by the user, the 30 second timed delay will expire and the settings will be reverted. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: gnome-display-manager -- gnome-display-properties: Does the display look OK dialogue not in front https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373519 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 15442] Re: panels change their position between logins
Same issue in Jaunty 32-bit. -- panels change their position between logins https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15442 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 15442] Re: panels change their position between logins
NOTE: The script supplied by Nagel no longer works in Jaunty. (https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-panel/+bug/15442/comments/15) It LOOKS like it works when it's run (it properly moves the panels around in the right manour), but when you log out and log back in, the panels are back to the old 'wrong order'. -- panels change their position between logins https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15442 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 315735] Re: FakeRAID fails with kernel 2.6.28
Here's the output of dmraid -ay -vvv -d http://pastebin.com/f4161b8ec -- FakeRAID fails with kernel 2.6.28 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315735 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 315735] Re: FakeRAID fails with kernel 2.6.28
(Also, based on the previous posts, it seems like a fix was released, and it worked for 1 or 2 people, but the rest say it is still a problem?) -- FakeRAID fails with kernel 2.6.28 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315735 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 315735] Re: FakeRAID fails with kernel 2.6.28
Thanks for your reply danwood76. But, if the original bug was fixed and cleared, why do some people still report the exact same problem? As I mentioned in my post on 2009-05-05, the symptoms still exist for me with an updated Jaunty, and I had to do the manual hack to fix it. It doesn't really make sense to report a new bug, when we might be better off to re-open this existing bug report and determine the problem for those who still experience issues, no? Thanks! -- FakeRAID fails with kernel 2.6.28 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315735 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 42121] Re: Symlinks for umountnfs / sendsigs wrong: hang on shutdown / reboot
I'm running Jaunty 9.04 now, and I just followed what I followed for intrepid (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysvinit/+bug/42121/comments/44), and the manual hack/fix works fine still for me. -- Symlinks for umountnfs / sendsigs wrong: hang on shutdown / reboot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42121 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 42121] Re: Symlinks for umountnfs / sendsigs wrong: hang on shutdown / reboot
NOTE: As keppy has mentioned, I can confirm that the bug is still present for 9.04. -- Symlinks for umountnfs / sendsigs wrong: hang on shutdown / reboot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42121 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 356031] Re: No acl tab in Jaunty
(sorry, also using ext3) -- No acl tab in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356031 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 356031] Re: No acl tab in Jaunty
Confirmed as well: * Ubuntu jaunty (2.6.28-11-server) * eiciel 0.9.6.1-2ubuntu1 I also don't have any nautilus integration. -- No acl tab in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356031 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351186] Re: [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] [ubuntu 9.10] [ubuntu 10.04] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled
Using the PPA mentioned in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source /fglrx-installer/+bug/351186/comments/414 on Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid Lynx) with ATI fglrx driver version 8.723.1-100408a-098580C-ATI patches the issue. -- [M76] [ubuntu 9.04] [ubuntu 9.10] [ubuntu 10.04] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult [please no more comments; patches welcome]
John, this is why we test the solution. Should someone implement a fix, I will volunteer for testing. We need to ensure that this fix works across the board for compiz, metacity, popular default themes, etc. single monitor, dual monitor. ATI/nvidia/Intel graphics (if that matters). This needs to be scoped ASAP for 10.04+. -- Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult [please no more comments; patches welcome] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 440865] Re: Visual notification for/correct user response to incoming voice calls and subscription requests not obvious
Same problem in Empathy 2.30.2. * Ubuntu 10.04 LTS * Empathy 2.30.2 * 2.6.32-23-generic Under preferences, Notifications tab, I unchecked everything, and then the notification just doesn't happen. -- Visual notification for/correct user response to incoming voice calls and subscription requests not obvious https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 440865] Re: Visual notification for/correct user response to incoming voice calls and subscription requests not obvious
Ah; So while the workaround didn't work, when I click on the mail icon in the applet, I was able to control the request. Shouldn't this functionality be available in Empathy itself? (rather than using the applet?) -- Visual notification for/correct user response to incoming voice calls and subscription requests not obvious https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 410418] Re: Thunderbird freezes when Play a sound is enabled
I'm experiencing this defect with the following: * Ubuntu 10.04 (2.6.32-23-generic) * Mozilla Thunderbird (3.0.8) * pulseaudio (1:0.9.22~0.9.21+stable-queue-32-g8478-0ubuntu14) Exact same symptoms as the original poster. ** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Thunderbird freezes when Play a sound is enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 327793] Re: Window decorations in title bar missing with compiz enabled
w4w4n wrote on 2010-01-20: CONFIRMED. Applying those options to the Device section in xorg.conf restores window decorations in compiz. -- Window decorations in title bar missing with compiz enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327793 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 356031] Re: No acl tab in Jaunty
Well, wow. I installed nautilus-actions also and it worked! If this is legitimate (and not a bug), then nautilus-actions MUST be a dependency or a recommended package for acl. I'm not really sure which one though ... because on a headless server, nautilus-actions doesn't make sense, but on a desktop, it should be a dependency Thoughts? -- No acl tab in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356031 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult
So there are two separate issues here now: 1. Border thickness (Thomas' patch) --- This introduction of a slider is a great idea. It gives the user some GUI control of his/her theme in GNOME. I think it's certainly a nice perk, and is yet another form of control given to the user via the GUI instead of modifying the XML file. This inadvertently provides an easier workaround for window resizing, but does not solve the underlying problem. 2. Border resize can be difficult with a thin border --- So here we have the scenario that if a user wants thin borders (or has chosen a theme with thin borders) for aesthetic reasons, then resizing his/her windows can be difficult. The difficulty to grab 1px of the screen is linearly proportional to the ever increasing resolution sizes on desktop monitors. Two ideas/solutions have been proposed: A) Virtual Border -- This would have to be user controllable, float. If the user is using a thick border, they probably would want to disable this, but if the user is using a thin border (1px for example), then they should be able to control the percentage of virtual border area +/- around the borders. As I stated previously (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/160311/comments/82), a good default is 0.15% for this value. B) Snap to Border -- This would also have to be user controllable, boolean. Disable/Enable. As some users have pointed out, some people will hate this behaviour, while others might find it useful. Snap to Border would be mutually exclusive to Virtual Border, but follow a similar implementation. If the user is within said 0.15% (user configurable), the cursor would snap to the actual border. -- Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult
Interesting idea Martin. This is just IMHO, but personally I don't see much value in a resize (or HDV) button. The same Resize (R) button is in the top left hand corner button (i don't' know what it's called) on most windows. Also, the usability of the Resize in that menu is functional at best ... it's not very intuitive for me. I guess I don't really think it addresses the problem at hand -- it just makes the existing Resize feature one less click away. -- Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 312632] Re: wish : no compulsory extension
I changed the status to incomplete. Just tried with EyeOfGnome (eog) 2.26.1, and the problem still exists. I personally tested with Ubuntu Jaunty 9.04, and I had someone else test in Ubuntu Karmic 9.10. Steps to reproduce. 1) Open any image with EyeOfGnome (Image Viewer) in Ubuntu. 2) File -- Save As 3) Now, we're prompted with a Name. Call it my picture I am saving 4) Click Save ERROR: File format is unknown or unsupported - Eye of GNOME could not determine a supported writable file format based on the filename. Please try a different file extension like .png or .jpg. OK, look at this, there's a File type drop down menu, currently said All Images. Try changing this to JPEG or PNG, try again, same error. There are two options here: A) [RECOMMENDED] When the user choses the filetype, it should automatically suffix the Name entry with that chosen filetype. B) eog shouldn't care if an extension exists (I don't think this is good though -- it is preferred to suffix images with the proper extension for its type) Here's my version on 9.04: $ dpkg --list | grep eog ii eog2.26.1-0ubuntu1 Eye of GNOME graphics viewer program ** Changed in: eog (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- wish : no compulsory extension https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312632 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 522590] Re: rdesktop clipboard (UBUNTU TO WINDOWS) stop working after using windows clipboard (WINDOWS TO WINDOWS) when -f is used
I can't even get this to work without the -f flag -- rdesktop clipboard (UBUNTU TO WINDOWS) stop working after using windows clipboard (WINDOWS TO WINDOWS) when -f is used https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522590 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 283385] Re: unable to to copy and paste files in a rdesktop session with glipper active
With glipper active, I cannot even select/copy text on the client machine. i.e. * Host: Ubuntu 9.04 * Client: WinXP In the client, I have some cygwin/rxvt windows open. Usually, if I select text from an rxvt window, I can paste it. However, with glipper active on the host machine, this is not possible. I had to uncheck Select - Mark/middle mouse button from glipper managing this. -- unable to to copy and paste files in a rdesktop session with glipper active https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283385 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 539196] Re: nvidia-settings X display configuration window doesn't work on nvidia-173 and nvidia-96
Agreed. How does one acquire the latest? It's very confusing where
things come from.
System Administration Hardware Drivers
* Shows that nvidia proprietary driver is in use. OK. (which version?? ...
useless)
Actually running nvidia-settings shows:
* Version = 96.43.13
Running Ubuntu 9.10:
{{{
$ dpkg --list | grep nvidia-settings
ii nvidia-settings 256.29-0ubuntu1~nvidiavdpauppa1
Tool of configuring the NVIDIA graphics driv
rc nvidia-settings-190
190.42-0ubuntu1~karmic~nvidiavdpauppa1 Tool of configuring the
NVIDIA graphics driv
}}}
{{{
$ dpkg --list | grep nvidia
ii libvdpau1 0.4-2~karmic~nvidiavdpauppa4
Video Decode and Presentation API for Unix (
ii libxine1
1.1.16.3-vdpau-0ubuntu2~karmic~nvidiavdpauppa1 the xine video/media
player library, meta-pa
ii libxine1-bin
1.1.16.3-vdpau-0ubuntu2~karmic~nvidiavdpauppa1 the xine video/media
player library, binary
ii libxine1-console
1.1.16.3-vdpau-0ubuntu2~karmic~nvidiavdpauppa1
libaa/libcaca/framebuffer/directfb related p
ii libxine1-ffmpeg
1.1.16.3-vdpau-0ubuntu2~karmic~nvidiavdpauppa1 MPEG-related plugins for
libxine1
ii libxine1-misc-plugins
1.1.16.3-vdpau-0ubuntu2~karmic~nvidiavdpauppa1 Input, audio output and
post plugins for lib
ii libxine1-x
1.1.16.3-vdpau-0ubuntu2~karmic~nvidiavdpauppa1 X desktop video output
plugins for libxine1
ii mplayer
2:1.0~rc3+svn20091207-0ubuntu1~karmic~nvidiavdpauppa11 movie player for
Unix-like systems
ii mplayer-nogui
2:1.0~rc3+svn20091207-0ubuntu1~karmic~nvidiavdpauppa11 movie player for
Unix-like systems
ii nvidia-173-modaliases 173.14.20-0ubuntu5
Modaliases for the NVIDIA binary X.Org drive
rc nvidia-190-libvdpau
190.42-0ubuntu1~karmic~nvidiavdpauppa4 Video Decode and
Presentation API for Unix
ii nvidia-190-modaliases
190.53-0ubuntu1~karmic~nvidiavdpauppa14Modaliases for the
NVIDIA binary X.Org drive
ii nvidia-96-kernel-source 96.43.13-0ubuntu6
NVIDIA binary kernel module source
ii nvidia-96-modaliases 96.43.13-0ubuntu6
Modaliases for the NVIDIA binary X.Org drive
rc nvidia-common 0.2.15.1-1~nvidiavdpauppa1
Find obsolete NVIDIA drivers
rc nvidia-glx-190
190.53-0ubuntu1~karmic~nvidiavdpauppa14NVIDIA binary Xorg driver
ii nvidia-glx-96 96.43.13-0ubuntu6
NVIDIA binary Xorg driver
ii nvidia-settings 256.29-0ubuntu1~nvidiavdpauppa1
Tool of configuring the NVIDIA graphics driv
rc nvidia-settings-190
190.42-0ubuntu1~karmic~nvidiavdpauppa1 Tool of configuring the
NVIDIA graphics driv
}}}
This is how (I believe) the nvidia drivers are acquired:
{{{
$ pwd
/etc/apt/sources.list.d
$ cat nvidia-vdpau-ppa-karmic.list
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/nvidia-vdpau/ppa/ubuntu karmic main
}}}
--
nvidia-settings X display configuration window doesn't work on nvidia-173 and
nvidia-96
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539196
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 523269] Re: Local collection empty
I'm running an external MySQL DB, why do we need to install mysql- server-core-5.1 on the client side? -- Local collection empty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to amarok in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 523269] Re: Local collection empty
(NOTE: Also affects latest amarok 2.3.0) -- Local collection empty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to amarok in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 582470] Re: many error (bug?) messages on console
How is a message like:
QVariantMap DBusMenuExporterDBus::GetProperties(int, const QStringList):
Condition failed: action
not a problem? If it's not a problem, it shouldn't print to stderr.
I'm getting the same error message as the poster, the above error
message is printed once for me, after opening Amarok in a terminal
window $ amarok
If I run with --debug:
{{{
amarok:
amarok: ** DEBUGGING OUTPUT IS NOW ENABLED. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL ONLY SEE
THE FULL OUTPUT ON THE NEXT START. **
amarok:
amarok: END__: static void App::handleCliArgs() - Took 0.00015s
amarok: END__: virtual int App::newInstance() - Took 0.00031s
amarok: BEGIN: void MainWindow::restoreLayout()
amarok: BEGIN: void MainWindow::layoutChanged()
amarok: [MainWindow] ignored: true
amarok: END__: void MainWindow::layoutChanged() - Took 6.9e-05s
amarok: BEGIN: void MainWindow::layoutChanged()
amarok: [MainWindow] ignored: true
amarok: END__: void MainWindow::layoutChanged() - Took 9.6e-05s
amarok: BEGIN: void MainWindow::layoutChanged()
amarok: [MainWindow] ignored: true
amarok: END__: void MainWindow::layoutChanged() - Took 0.00071s
amarok: BEGIN: void MainWindow::layoutChanged()
amarok: [MainWindow] ignored: true
amarok: END__: void MainWindow::layoutChanged() - Took 8e-05s
amarok: BEGIN: void MainWindow::layoutChanged()
amarok: [MainWindow] ignored: true
amarok: END__: void MainWindow::layoutChanged() - Took 6.3e-05s
amarok: BEGIN: void MainWindow::layoutChanged()
amarok: [MainWindow] ignored: true
amarok: END__: void MainWindow::layoutChanged() - Took 8.7e-05s
amarok: END__: void MainWindow::restoreLayout() - Took 0.12s
amarok: BEGIN: void Albums::dataUpdated(const QString, const QHashQString,
QVariant)
amarok: END__: void Albums::dataUpdated(const QString, const QHashQString,
QVariant) - Took 5.8e-05s
amarok: BEGIN: void CurrentTrack::dataUpdated(const QString, const
QHashQString, QVariant)
amarok: END__: void CurrentTrack::dataUpdated(const QString, const
QHashQString, QVariant) - Took 0.0001s
amarok: BEGIN: void Playlist::PrettyListView::fixInvisible()
amarok: END__: void Playlist::PrettyListView::fixInvisible() - Took 9e-05s
QVariantMap DBusMenuExporterDBus::GetProperties(int, const QStringList):
Condition failed: action
}}}
Running:
* Ubuntu 10.04
* Amarok 2.3.0
* 2.6.32-21-generic
** Changed in: amarok (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = Incomplete
** Changed in: amarok (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
many error (bug?) messages on console
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582470
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to amarok in ubuntu.
--
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult
@ Melroy van den Berg [QUOTE] Clem has a good alternative in the mainwhile: press Alt on the keyboard while pressing the middle click on the mouse to resize the window [/QUOTE] This workaround doesn't work on terminal windows (or anything that happens to have an editable text field if you're mouse is over it it wants to quickpaste text instead of resize. heh.) -- Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult
@ David Siegel, [QUOTE] We will be discussing this bug and a solution for it at Ubuntu Developer Summit next week. Please save your breath, we know it's high priority and we are going to fix it! [/QUOTE] Indeed, a good question. Was there any verdict/action from the discussion? (willing to help test and such if needed) -- Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 207065] Re: Bad Compiz Bindings Bug
Confirmed this patch on Ubuntu 10.04 using the apt-get source method:
NOTE: This is a workaround until we get the next compizconfig package upstream
into ubuntu 10.04. The version just prior to these changes is:
{{{
$ dpkg --list | grep compizconfig
ii compizconfig-backend-gconf0.8.4-0ubuntu2
Settings library for plugins - OpenCompositi
}}}
, so anything after this should have the fix already. (i.e. if you have a
version later than the above, you shouldn't have to perform these instructions.
PRECONDITIONS:
0) As per AbtZ noted, there are some package dependencies to build the
compizconfig source:
{{{
sudo apt-get install compiz-dev libcompizconfig0-dev build-essential git-core
autoconf libglib2.0-dev intltool libgconf2-dev
}}}
PROCEDURE:
1) Install the compizconfig-backend-gconf source:
{{{
sudo cp settings-backend/.libs/libgconf.* /usr/lib/compizconfig/backends/
}}}
2) Traverse into the settings-backend sub-dir of the source:
{{{
cd compizconfig-backend-gconf-0.8.4/settings-backend/
}}}
3) Grab and apply the patch supplied by Guido!
{{{
sudo wget http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39947363/resize-with-right-button.patch
sudo patch resize-with-right-button.patch
}}}
4) Copy the newly modified files to your system:
{{{
metacity --replace (# OR: ALT+F2 -- metacity --replace)
for file in /usr/lib/compizconfig/backends/libgconf.* ; do sudo mv $file
$file.backup ; done
sudo cp settings-backend/.libs/libgconf.* /usr/lib/compizconfig/backends/
compiz --replace (# OR: ALT+F2 -- compiz --replace)
}}}
Now, I can flip the gconf variable:
apps/metacity/general/resize_with_right_button and watch
simultaneously in compizconfig-settings-manager (Window Management --
Resize Window -- Initiate Window Resize) change as I check/uncheck
the var in gconf-editor.
Great work Guido!
--
Bad Compiz Bindings Bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207065
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult
Interesting, it didn't work for me at all. The window would basically get sent to background behind other windows. I had to apply the patch in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/207065. Now, Alt+MiddleClick resize works on any window, and if I so choose, Alt+RightClick resize works on any window. -- Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 455378] Re: Can't resize windows to be displayed on several monitors
I'm experiencing the same bug using ATI proprietary fglrx drivers, so it's not ATi/nVidia related given that people are seeing the problem using both vendor cards. -- Can't resize windows to be displayed on several monitors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455378 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 603408] [NEW] Add ability to more intuitively add/remove Desktop Icons through the Appearance Preferences Window
Public bug reported: For many users coming from the Windows World, they are used to seeing familiar icons on their desktop such as My Computer, My Documents, Recycling Bin, etc. The most intuitive way to try to get these icons is to right click on the desktop, and find a menu which might relate to this modification. I've been with Ubuntu since 6.XX days (now using 10.04), and the closest menu item I've seen for this is: Desktop -- Right Click -- Change Desktop Background. Now, this opens the Appearance Preferences dialogue window. Unfortunately, the user can browse through this window and it's tabs and menus, but will not find the ability to add desktop icons. As per http://ubuntu-tutorials.com/2006/12/07/how-to-include-my- computer-or-my-documents-icon-your-desktop-ubuntu-510-6061-610/, it is currently possible to achieve this goal using the gconf-editor tool. This is certainly an acceptable means for any moderate to expert user, but doesn't really help the beginners unless they can properly Google for this problem, and that assumes they'll even spend more time on this than they already did looking through the menus and system preferences without success. SUGGESTION: Add a tab to Appearance Preferences called Desktop. In here, the user should be able to control the addition and removal of Desktop Icons (and perhaps other things going forward!). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: gnome (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Jul 8 21:11:19 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100427.1) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_CA.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: meta-gnome2 ** Affects: meta-gnome2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- Add ability to more intuitively add/remove Desktop Icons through the Appearance Preferences Window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/603408 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 603408] Re: Add ability to more intuitively add/remove Desktop Icons through the Appearance Preferences Window
** Attachment added: Screenshot of how the user can currently customize the Desktop Icons in Ubuntu http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51600863/Screenshot-Configuration%20Editor%20-%20desktop.png -- Add ability to more intuitively add/remove Desktop Icons through the Appearance Preferences Window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/603408 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 603408] Re: Add ability to more intuitively add/remove Desktop Icons through the Appearance Preferences Window
Submitted idea to http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/1319/ -- Add ability to more intuitively add/remove Desktop Icons through the Appearance Preferences Window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/603408 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult
[QUOTE] It would be helpful to know what is wrong with the current approach, which has changed considerably from two years ago. The default themes now have a _considerably large_ hotspot for resizing on all four corners of every window. From my perspective, this problem feels like it's solved (though there is a slight learning curve for those coming from Windows). So, why is that solution insufficient? [/QUOTE] Hey Dylan, I just tried using: * Ubuntu 10.04 * Theme: Ambiance * terminal window and nautilus window The corner hotspots are certainly helpful, however, I wouldn't call them hotspots. With the ambiance theme, it looks like they tried to make things a little easier by increasing the BOTTOM BORDER width to ~5px(?). This gives the illusion of a hotspot, but if you try to increase the height of the window by using the bottom border, you'll realize that those hotspots are simply a byproduct of the thicker bottom border. As everyone has already mentioned numerous times, this bug is a terrible UI bug. It shouldn't be hard to maneuver your mouse cursor over that tini tiny right/left border of 1px. It's been a while since I've used Windows, so I fired up my Virtual WinXP. It would appear that they've simply opted for the 5px(?) border size all around to ensure users can easily resize. (I don't feel like rebooting into Win7 to see how it is with the latest Windows) Perhaps, the solution for Ubuntu Linux, would be to force all themes to have a 5px theme (by default). If the user is a aesthetic/power user, then they can change the border size themselves, then suffer through difficulty of resizing (or they'll know to use ALT+resize -- although that in itself has issues). I truly believe that the default needs to be user friendly (i.e. an easy to use UI in this case), rather than an aesthetically pleasing 1px border. -- Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult
[QUOTE] Think about it... if the window is maximized, this region lies outside the window and is unreachable. [/QUOTE] Doug, A great idea, but how would this work with dual/milti monitors? Or, even, with the grid plugin from compiz, (allows you to square off windows with relative ease CTRL+ALT+NUMPAD1 = bottom left, CTRL+ALT+NUMPAD3 = bottom right, etc.). Certainly an outside invisible area would overlap windows, and would have to be considered in implementation. -- Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 603582] Re: Please merge mdadm 3.1.4-1 (main) from Debian stable (main)
NOTE: I've re-opened bug #495370 -- this bug DID NOT address the back- port to lucid... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/603582 Title: Please merge mdadm 3.1.4-1 (main) from Debian stable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/603582/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 495370] Re: Please upgrade to a non-outdated version
I'm re-opening this defect. It was marked as a duplicate of bug #603582, that bug was resolved, but it didn't back-port to 10.04 (lucid!) Still running 10.04.04 LTS ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 603582 Please merge mdadm 3.1.4-1 (main) from Debian stable (main) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495370 Title: Please upgrade to a non-outdated version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/495370/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 495370] Re: Please upgrade to a non-outdated version
fermulator@fermmy-server:~$ cat /etc/issue Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS \n \l fermulator@fermmy-server:~$ uname -a Linux fermmy-server 2.6.32-49-generic-pae #111-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 20 21:44:04 UTC 2013 i686 GNU/Linux fermulator@fermmy-server:~$ mdadm --version mdadm - v2.6.7.1 - 15th October 2008 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495370 Title: Please upgrade to a non-outdated version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/495370/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1244619]
So to clarify, what is the expected fix here? For users that have TB24.0, and downgraded to lightning 2.6.0, say on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, what is the going forward path to remove ourselves from this workaround state? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1244619 Title: Thunderbird must be upgraded to Thunderbird 24.0.1 for lightning 2.6.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightning-extension/+bug/1244619/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1244619]
(In reply to Cyrille from comment #38) (In reply to fermulator from comment #32) So to clarify, what is the expected fix here? For users that have TB24.0, and downgraded to lightning 2.6.0, say on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, what is the going forward path to remove ourselves from this workaround state? On Linux Ubuntu 12.04 there is Thunderbird 24.0. So I've desactivate Lightning 2.6.1 and installed 2.6 from this page: https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/thunderbird/addon/lightning/versions/ ?page=1#version-2.6 And desactivated too the thunderbird automatic module update ... That isn't a going forward path. Think -- when TB 25.0 is released, or when lightning 2.6.2 is released... How do users automatically get fixed onto the auto-updates train again? Remember that not all users are computer gurus here ... I have many clients who don't know how to manage this -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1244619 Title: Thunderbird must be upgraded to Thunderbird 24.0.1 for lightning 2.6.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightning-extension/+bug/1244619/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1271784] Re: Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux-headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb
fermulator@fermmy-server:/etc/apt/sources.list.d$ uname -a Linux fermmy-server 2.6.32-55-generic-pae #117-Ubuntu SMP Tue Dec 3 17:50:05 UTC 2013 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1271784 Title: Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux- headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1271784/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1271784] [NEW] Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux-headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb
Public bug reported: Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb Error in function: A fatal error occurred Please report this as a bug and include the files /var/log/dist-upgrade/main.log and /var/log/dist-upgrade/apt.log in your report. The upgrade has aborted. Your original sources.list was saved in /etc/apt/sources.list.distUpgrade. SystemError: E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) No pending crash reports. Try --help for more information. Could not install the upgrades The upgrade has aborted. Your system could be in an unusable state. A recovery will run now (dpkg --configure -a). ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1271784 Title: Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux- headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1271784/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1271784] Re: Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux-headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb
** Attachment added: apt.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1271784/+attachment/3954751/+files/apt.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1271784 Title: Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux- headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1271784/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1271784] Re: Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux-headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb
More garbage: dpkg: error processing python (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 101 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of python-apport: python-apport depends on python (= 2.7.1-0ubuntu2); however: Package python is not configured yet. python-apport depends on python ( 2.8); however: Package python is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing python-apport (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Setting up gettext (0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3) ... dpkg: unrecoverable fatal error, aborting: unable to create `/var/lib/dpkg/updates/tmp.i': No space left on device Traceback (most recent call last): File ./xorg_fix_proprietary.py, line 122, in module filemode='w') File /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/__init__.py, line 1519, in basicConfig hdlr = FileHandler(filename, mode) File /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/__init__.py, line 897, in __init__ StreamHandler.__init__(self, self._open()) File /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/__init__.py, line 916, in _open stream = open(self.baseFilename, self.mode) IOError: [Errno 28] No space left on device: '/var/log/dist-upgrade/xorg_fixup.log' Upgrade complete The upgrade has completed but there were errors during the upgrade process. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1271784 Title: Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux- headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1271784/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1271784] Re: Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux-headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb
(what else do I need to submit here?) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1271784 Title: Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux- headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1271784/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1271784] Re: Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux-headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb
It's freaking out about no space left ... lies!
{{{
E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'sudo dpkg --configure -a' to
correct the problem.
fermulator@fermmy-server:/etc/apt/sources.list.d$ sudo dpkg --configure -a
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ...
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-58-generic-pae
cp: cannot create regular file
`/tmp/mkinitramfs_zLhwgn//lib/modules/3.2.0-58-generic-pae/kernel/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4vf/cxgb4vf.ko':
No space left on device
mkdir: cannot create directory
`/tmp/mkinitramfs_zLhwgn//lib/modules/3.2.0-58-generic-pae/kernel/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb':
No space left on device
cp: cannot create regular file
`/tmp/mkinitramfs_zLhwgn//lib/modules/3.2.0-58-generic-pae/kernel/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb':
No space left on device
mkdir: cannot create directory
`/tmp/mkinitramfs_zLhwgn//lib/modules/3.2.0-58-generic-pae/kernel/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro':
No space left on device
cp: cannot create regular file
`/tmp/mkinitramfs_zLhwgn//lib/modules/3.2.0-58-generic-pae/kernel/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac':
No such file or directory
mkdir: cannot create directory
`/tmp/mkinitramfs_zLhwgn//lib/modules/3.2.0-58-generic-pae/kernel/drivers/dca':
No space left on device
cp: cannot create regular file
`/tmp/mkinitramfs_zLhwgn//lib/modules/3.2.0-58-generic-pae/kernel/drivers/dca':
No space left on device
}}}
fermulator@fermmy-server:~$ df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/md1001 9.2G 7.8G 944M 90% /
udev2.0G 12K 2.0G 1% /dev
tmpfs 785M 532K 784M 1% /run
none5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock
none2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /run/shm
/dev/md1000 2.8T 1.9T 750G 72% /media/arrays/md1000
/dev/md2000 11T 8.7T 1.6T 85% /media/arrays/md2000
/dev/md250 220G 102G 107G 49% /media/arrays/md250
/dev/md640 587G 229G 329G 41% /media/arrays/md640
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1271784
Title:
Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux-
headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1271784/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1271784] Re: Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux-headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb
(also, this is the /2nd/ time I've tried to upgrade, everything was clean before, the first time it borked hard but I didn't record the logs :( -- it left the system in a bad state with apache2 uninstalled, samba configuration wiped ... it was sad :() -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1271784 Title: Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux- headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1271784/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1271784] Re: Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux-headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb
I believe Im able to resolve the space issue via
http://askubuntu.com/questions/386282/update-manager-gives-an-error-message
{{{
sudo mv /var/lib/dpkg/status /var/lib/dpkg/status-bad
sudo cp /var/lib/dpkg/status-old /var/lib/dpkg/status
sudo mv /var/lib/dpkg/available /var/lib/dpkg/available-bad
sudo cp /var/lib/dpkg/available-old /var/lib/dpkg/available
sudo rm -rf /var/lib/dpkg/updates/*
sudo rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*
sudo mkdir /var/lib/apt/lists/partial
sudo rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin
sudo apt-get clean
sudo apt-get autoremove
sudo apt-get update
sudo dpkg --configure -a
sudo apt-get install -f
}}}
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1271784
Title:
Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux-
headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1271784/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1271784] Re: Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux-headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb
Yikes, I didn't know about -i on df :
{{{
fermulator@fermmy-server:~$ df -i
FilesystemInodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/md1001 610800 609388 1412 100% /
udev 206230 7632054671% /dev
tmpfs 209054 7522083021% /run
none 209054 52090491% /run/lock
none 209054 12090531% /run/shm
/dev/md1000183148544 1589168 1815593761% /media/arrays/md1000
/dev/md2000732569600 19410 7325501901% /media/arrays/md2000
/dev/md250 14589952 108979 144809731% /media/arrays/md250
/dev/md640 39075840 14828 390610121% /media/arrays/md640
fermulator@fermmy-server:~$ df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/md1001 9.2G 7.1G 1.7G 81% /
udev2.0G 12K 2.0G 1% /dev
tmpfs 785M 540K 784M 1% /run
none5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock
none2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /run/shm
/dev/md1000 2.8T 1.9T 750G 72% /media/arrays/md1000
/dev/md2000 11T 8.7T 1.6T 85% /media/arrays/md2000
/dev/md250 220G 102G 107G 49% /media/arrays/md250
/dev/md640 587G 229G 329G 41% /media/arrays/md640
}}}
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1271784
Title:
Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux-
headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1271784/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1271784] Re: Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux-headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb
To help users in the future, I've updated the wiki: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PreciseUpgrades#Before_You_Start to include make sure you have enough disk space (although I wish I knew the actual requirements here) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1271784 Title: Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux- headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1271784/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1271784] Re: Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux-headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb
OK so we've discovered that I ran out of inodes in the middle of the
upgrade (AFAICT).
I saw that I had a butt load of linux-headers (stale/old) in /usr/src.
{{{
root@fermmy-server:/usr/src# ls -alt
total 168
drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 Jan 22 21:03 linux-headers-3.2.0-58
drwxrwsr-x 42 root src 4096 Jan 22 21:02 .
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Jan 22 20:13 linux-headers-3.2.0-58-generic-pae
drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096 Jan 22 20:10 ..
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Jan 22 13:03 linux-headers-2.6.32-55-generic-pae
drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 Jan 3 06:55 linux-headers-2.6.32-55
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Dec 3 06:47 linux-headers-2.6.32-54-generic-pae
drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 Dec 3 06:47 linux-headers-2.6.32-54
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Nov 8 06:30 linux-headers-2.6.32-53-generic-pae
drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 Nov 8 06:30 linux-headers-2.6.32-53
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Sep 30 06:48 linux-headers-2.6.32-52-generic-pae
drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 Sep 30 06:48 linux-headers-2.6.32-52
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Sep 6 06:46 linux-headers-2.6.32-51-generic-pae
drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 Sep 6 06:45 linux-headers-2.6.32-51
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Aug 31 21:07 vboxhost-4.2.16 -
../share/virtualbox/src/vboxhost
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Jul 30 06:44 linux-headers-2.6.32-50-generic-pae
drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 Jul 30 06:44 linux-headers-2.6.32-50
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Jul 4 2013 linux-headers-2.6.32-49-generic-pae
drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 Jul 4 2013 linux-headers-2.6.32-49
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Jun 14 2013 linux-headers-2.6.32-48-generic-pae
drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 Jun 14 2013 linux-headers-2.6.32-48
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 May 15 2013 linux-headers-2.6.32-47-generic-pae
drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 May 15 2013 linux-headers-2.6.32-47
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Apr 19 2013 linux-headers-2.6.32-46-generic-pae
drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 Apr 19 2013 linux-headers-2.6.32-46
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Feb 22 2013 linux-headers-2.6.32-45-generic-pae
drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 Feb 22 2013 linux-headers-2.6.32-45
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Oct 11 2012 linux-headers-2.6.32-44-generic-pae
drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 Oct 11 2012 linux-headers-2.6.32-44
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Oct 2 2012 linux-headers-2.6.32-41-generic-pae
drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 Oct 2 2012 linux-headers-2.6.32-41
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Sep 18 2012 linux-headers-2.6.32-43-generic-pae
drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 Sep 18 2012 linux-headers-2.6.32-43
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Sep 5 2012 linux-headers-2.6.32-42-generic-pae
drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 Sep 5 2012 linux-headers-2.6.32-42
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Mar 23 2012 linux-headers-2.6.32-40-generic-pae
drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 Mar 23 2012 linux-headers-2.6.32-40
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Mar 6 2012 linux-headers-2.6.32-39-generic-pae
drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 Mar 6 2012 linux-headers-2.6.32-39
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Jan 24 2012 linux-headers-2.6.32-38-generic-pae
drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 Jan 24 2012 linux-headers-2.6.32-38
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Dec 20 2011 linux-headers-2.6.32-37-generic-pae
drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 Dec 20 2011 linux-headers-2.6.32-37
}}}
I couldn't properly remove them via sudo apt-get remove --purge because of
the bad state of apt, so I forcibly removed them (sudo rm -Rf) the last 4x.
Now i have more free inodes yay:
{{{
root@fermmy-server:/usr/src# df -i
FilesystemInodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/md1001 610800 586132 24668 96% /
}}}
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1271784
Title:
Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux-
headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1271784/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1271784] Re: Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux-headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb
This is crazy ; how is the system done? (the upgrade seemed to fail terribly?) fermulator@fermmy-server:~$ sudo do-release-upgrade --mode=server Checking for a new Ubuntu release No new release found fermulator@fermmy-server:~$ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade -f Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1271784 Title: Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux- headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1271784/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1271784] Re: Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux-headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb
Logs indicate it failed around here [Errno 28] No space left on device: '/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/numpy/core/tests/test_print.pyc' dpkg: error processing python (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 101 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of python-apport: python-apport depends on python (= 2.7.1-0ubuntu2); however: Package python is not configured yet. python-apport depends on python ( 2.8); however: Package python is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing python-apport (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Setting up gettext (0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3) ... dpkg: unrecoverable fatal error, aborting: unable to create `/var/lib/dpkg/updates/tmp.i': No space left on device Traceback (most recent call last): File ./xorg_fix_proprietary.py, line 122, in module filemode='w') File /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/__init__.py, line 1519, in basicConfig hdlr = FileHandler(filename, mode) File /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/__init__.py, line 897, in __init__ StreamHandler.__init__(self, self._open()) File /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/__init__.py, line 916, in _open stream = open(self.baseFilename, self.mode) IOError: [Errno 28] No space left on device: '/var/log/dist-upgrade/xorg_fixup.log' Upgrade complete The upgrade has completed but there were errors during the upgrade process. To continue please press [ENTER] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1271784 Title: Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while
[Bug 1271784] Re: Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux-headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb
I think the suggestion here would be for the tool to prevent an upgrade if there isn't enough disk space (or in my case, inodes... ;o) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1271784 Title: Upgrade from 10.04.04 to 12.04 : while processing linux- headers-3.2.0-58_3.2.0-58.88_all.deb To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1271784/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1170697] Re: Sound not working after upgrading to 3.8.0-19
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1169984 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169984
Interesting. I am also experiencing this same bug on Ubuntu 12.04 (3.2
kernel...) -- did we accidentally back-merge the bug?
{{{
multimedia@fermmy-media:~$ uname -a
Linux fermmy-media 3.2.0-51-generic-pae #77-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 24 20:40:32 UTC
2013 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
multimedia@fermmy-media:~$ cat /etc/issue
Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS \n \l
}}}
dmesg + backtrace: http://pastebin.com/uMAmEnxD
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1170697
Title:
Sound not working after upgrading to 3.8.0-19
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1170697/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169984] Re: 3.8.0-18 HDMI/DisplayPort audio regression: Either oops or opening device fails with -ENODEV
(oops, posted in the Dup'd bug #1170697) - reposting here
Interesting. I am also experiencing this same bug on Ubuntu 12.04 (3.2
kernel...) -- did we accidentally back-merge the bug?
{{{
multimedia@fermmy-media:~$ uname -a
Linux fermmy-media 3.2.0-51-generic-pae #77-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 24 20:40:32 UTC
2013 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
multimedia@fermmy-media:~$ cat /etc/issue
Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS \n \l
}}}
dmesg + backtrace: http://pastebin.com/uMAmEnxD
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169984
Title:
3.8.0-18 HDMI/DisplayPort audio regression: Either oops or opening
device fails with -ENODEV
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-desktop-tests/+bug/1169984/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169984] Re: 3.8.0-18 HDMI/DisplayPort audio regression: Either oops or opening device fails with -ENODEV
Also, it's worthy to note, that after disabling the HDMI kernel module as recommended as workaround, Pulse no longer crashes, and I can successfully use my Creative SB card again -- /not/ using HDMI audio on the Graphics Card. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169984 Title: 3.8.0-18 HDMI/DisplayPort audio regression: Either oops or opening device fails with -ENODEV To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-desktop-tests/+bug/1169984/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1024922] Re: ubuntu 12.04 with gnome 3.4, no titlebar, menus at all
fermulator@fermmy-notebook:~$ dpkg --list | grep -E gnome-shell ii gnome-shell 3.10.4-0ubuntu5.1 amd64graphical shell for the GNOME desktop ii gnome-shell-common3.10.4-0ubuntu5.1 all common files for the GNOME graphical shell fermulator@fermmy-notebook:~$ uname -a Linux fermmy-notebook 3.13.0-30-generic #54-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jun 9 22:45:01 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux fermulator@fermmy-notebook:~$ cat /etc/issue Ubuntu 14.04 LTS \n \l -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1024922 Title: ubuntu 12.04 with gnome 3.4, no titlebar, menus at all To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1024922/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1024922] Re: ubuntu 12.04 with gnome 3.4, no titlebar, menus at all
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2219932 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1024922 Title: ubuntu 12.04 with gnome 3.4, no titlebar, menus at all To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1024922/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1024922] Re: ubuntu 12.04 with gnome 3.4, no titlebar, menus at all
It is strange. The bug appears for me only with nautilus (file browser). If I open firefox, terminal, etc. they all have the title window as expected. ** Attachment added: Screenshot from 2014-06-30 09:12:16.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1024922/+attachment/4142471/+files/Screenshot%20from%202014-06-30%2009%3A12%3A16.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1024922 Title: ubuntu 12.04 with gnome 3.4, no titlebar, menus at all To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1024922/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314486] Re: Flash videos disappears/underlays when using Fullscreen mode.
Same issue in Ubunt 14.04 gnome-shell, fglrx drivermultimedia@fermmy-media:~$ uname -a Linux fermmy-media 3.13.0-33-generic #58-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jul 29 16:47:17 UTC 2014 i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux multimedia@fermmy-media:~$ cat /etc/issue Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS \n \l multimedia@fermmy-media:~$ dpkg --list | grep fglrx ii fglrx 2:14.100-0ubuntu1 i386 Video driver for the AMD graphics accelerators ii fglrx-amdcccle 2:14.100-0ubuntu1 i386 Catalyst Control Center for the AMD graphics accelerators ii fglrx-dev 2:14.100-0ubuntu1 i386 Video driver for the AMD graphics accelerators (devel files) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314486 Title: Flash videos disappears/underlays when using Fullscreen mode. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1314486/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1285444] Re: Login Successful, Desktop Never Loads
Similar issue. My workaround is when the system starts, hit CTRL+ALT+F1 to hit the TTY1 ... (see login prompt), then hit CTRL+ALT+F7, and suddenly X is all running and happy ... not sure why its not auto-loading anymore since upgrade from 13.10 to 14.04... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1285444 Title: Login Successful, Desktop Never Loads To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1285444/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
