Re: How to recovery from a file accidentally committed twice?

2021-08-17 Thread Klaus Ethgen
Am Di den 17. Aug 2021 um 19:06 schrieb Marc Haber:
> one second of not paying attention did it, and I accidentally committed
> a file that is in one vcsh-repository, bin/foo to a second vcsh
> repository. Now both repos are fighting about that file. vcsh bar rm
> bin/foo just took the fight to another limit?
> 
> How do I recover, telling the wrong repository to completely forget about the 
> file?

vcsh bar rm --cached bin/foo

Gruß
   Klaus
-- 
Klaus Ethgen   http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub  4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16    Klaus Ethgen 
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753  62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
vcs-home mailing list
vcs-home@lists.madduck.net
https://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-home


Re: Managing git remotes

2016-03-07 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hi,

Am So den  6. Mär 2016 um 18:06 schrieb Christopher Baines:
> just fixup?), so it does not really work. I also want 2 standard remotes
> for most of the repositories, but that would require adding different
> fixup lines to all of repository definitions.

Well, Maybe not for the past, but why don't you use git
url..insteadOf feature? That allows you to use kind of alias for
your Repos and if they change, just change the alias. I used to have
short alias for my main repositories.

Regards
   Klaus
- -- 
Klaus Ethgen  http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub  4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16   Klaus Ethgen 
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753  62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
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=m5eM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
vcs-home mailing list
vcs-home@lists.madduck.net
http://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-home


Re: git-annex - documentation clarification - I've had data loss

2014-02-10 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Just a hint to eventually get your data back:

Am Mo den 10. Feb 2014 um 13:50 schrieb Matthew Hannigan:
> Next I reformated the disk, and get a funny feeling that the copy went
> a little too fast ...

Try to use some forensic tools. If you just formated your disk and did
not write any data to it, the change is high that you get back most of
the files in case of mp3/video/images.

Regards
   Klaus
- -- 
Klaus Ethgen  http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub  4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16   Klaus Ethgen 
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753  62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQGcBAEBCgAGBQJS+QJ0AAoJEKZ8CrGAGfasMQQL/RlnCSXinqIrJjSV1rI7Q4zi
NGQk/w7qT+jJ8XXYyMDnoAv+himrvk+cMvVXjE/8CvwGutDKwvXvX2zxUaC8yBjo
/H4hZAxQwVENDRtfiGo5+HxrYgUUbv0vpqK0r05ddXK5JZ7YYMuLFP8y2TAVzcQl
VYyX3NkACmpLkTPYTSt4C1QYQjcuJV/vQ+LydXYA0nW+kuBHgo4q+F3EMw5K5HPi
mlkfIzGZWh/+z5EFJcfxvLDiF4xSgO6B2cX7SUFMt/B5Qwp1TotTdG/dtR3KXo7B
EM3P3qsyONDyjELXkBgOZIWgbbcZqXSJZOqY+BtoTmQc9F5pkI4DOLIqmqKLpIRC
4SnHtsDelAOH4Aribu8Puq6QSOgNgugOiTN+v3MxhvPMI4XSFZNCxu4n3z68Dwmp
1vkNHGWc3kaxVHhFvyOstySTElNx7Q/Q8Ap0Yg24Td6LfcgZ2OsJ2kHEdmUvSCz9
ZrtbSrjZAbnZCnC8YYTRKWSTkhQE1xnyAX5hS4FLTA==
=2Mdb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
vcs-home mailing list
vcs-home@lists.madduck.net
http://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-home


Re: more git-annex plumbing

2012-04-16 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hello,

Am Mo den 16. Apr 2012 um 10:59 schrieb Thomas Koch:
> I have a few things that I'd like to do with git-annex but that are hard 
> because git-annex does not expose internal plumbing commands. I intend to 
> start a list of such commands here with possible use cases:
> 
> - calculate checksum of a file
> - doesAnnexHasChecksum?
> - doesAnnexHasFile?
> 
>   Useful to deduplicate files from many old CD backups
> 
> - checksum to path
> - move file into annex

Especially the second last I was searching for many times. I did this
with some pipe doing readlink and grep.

Regards
   Klaus
- -- 
Klaus Ethgen  http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub  4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16   Klaus Ethgen 
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753  62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=2Yca
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
vcs-home mailing list
vcs-home@lists.madduck.net
http://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-home


Re: Spaces in remotes and git annex

2012-01-05 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message

Hi joey,

Am Do den  5. Jan 2012 um 19:38 schrieb Joey Hess:
> > Today I cloned a remote git annexed repository that has a space in path.
> > With git I have to use one backslash instead of three that are needed in
> > scp. Now I tried to get a document from that repository and failed as
> > git-annex seems to use scp and need all three backslashes.
> > 
> > Is there any way to work around that problem?
> 
> I've pushed a change that improves git-annex's support for weird urls
> like this:
> 
> url = ssh://localhost/home/joey/tmp/foo bar
> url = localhost:tmp/foo bar
> 
> Before, git-annex would seem to ignore the first of these (it actually
> thought it was a local directory!), and complained the second was a
> bad url, now both are supported and work in my tests.

I'll give it a try. Thanks. :-) (Uhm.. first have to install ghc.)

> Maybe this will fix your problem. If not, what kind of repository is it,
> a git repository, or a special remote, and what does the url for it in
> .git/config look like?

Sure, it is a git repo.

Regards
   Klaus
-- 
Klaus Ethgen      http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub  4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16   Klaus Ethgen 
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753  62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=bc9e
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
vcs-home mailing list
vcs-home@lists.madduck.net
http://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-home


Spaces in remotes and git annex

2012-01-05 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message

Hi,

I seems to be predestined to find strange problems. ;-)

Today I cloned a remote git annexed repository that has a space in path.
With git I have to use one backslash instead of three that are needed in
scp. Now I tried to get a document from that repository and failed as
git-annex seems to use scp and need all three backslashes.

Is there any way to work around that problem?

Regards
   Klaus
-- 
Klaus Ethgen  http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub  4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16   Klaus Ethgen 
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753  62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=1f+I
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
vcs-home mailing list
vcs-home@lists.madduck.net
http://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-home


Re: syncing non-git trees with git-annex

2011-12-14 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message

Am Mi den 14. Dez 2011 um 14:15 schrieb Adam Spiers:
> >  find -name \*.avi -exec git annex add {} \;
> 
> That's substantially less performant, because it forks a whole new
> tree of git / git-annex processes per file.
> 
> If we're getting picky, we should also worry about spaces in
> filenames:
> 
>   find -name \*.avi -print0 | xargs -0 git annex add
> 
> but it was only an example, and to be honest, I didn't even use the
> xargs variant myself; I used zsh's recursive globbing:
> 
>   git annex add **/*.avi

Well, the zsh syntax is fine as long as the matches are not too much. If
the result gets to big your command line would get too big.

On the other hand you can use find as the following:
   find -name \*.avi -exec git annex add {} +

This will not spawn new process for every file but will also work with
more files a command line can hold. And it is even a bit more performant
as the xargs version.

Regards
   Klaus
-- 
Klaus Ethgen  http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub  4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16   Klaus Ethgen 
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753  62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=f0ez
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
vcs-home mailing list
vcs-home@lists.madduck.net
http://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-home


Re: Lost Repository Was: Removing git-annex Repo

2011-12-05 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Am Mo den  5. Dez 2011 um 17:19 schrieb Joey Hess:
> Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> > > Can you check out the git-annex branch and run git-log on uuid.log, 
> > > and see what the most recent change to it looked like?
> > 
> > It is an update. After that I revert this update and the next time it
> > will purged again.
> 
> It sort of sounds as if you are checking out the git-annex branch,
> manually editing and committing a file, and seeing git-annex revert
> that change.

Well, after the Bug happens several times I started to do the following
after git-annex removed the occurrences:
   git checkout git-annex
   git cherry-pick  # This id is the first time I fixed it by hand
   git add trust.log uuid.log
   git commit -m "Correcting update"
   git checkout master

The patch looks somethink like:
   diff --git a/trust.log b/trust.log
   index xxx..xxx 100644
   --- a/trust.log
   +++ b/trust.log
   @@ -1 +1,2 @@
---- 1 timestamp=1322867090.765867s
   +---- 0 timestamp=1322867165.394761s
   diff --git a/uuid.log b/uuid.log
   index xxx..xxx 100644
   --- a/uuid.log
   +++ b/uuid.log
   @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
   ----- Backup timestamp=1322866827.929813s
---- Master timestamp=1322866770.445515s
   +---- Backup timestamp=1322866827.929813s
   +---- Clone timestamp=1322867722.827595s

Which is the revert of this two files.

> That's expected behavior actually..
> http://git-annex.branchable.com/internals/ explains why. 

Sorry, no it don't. I do not want to modify the git-annex branch as I
know it is internal. But the situation gives me no other choice than to
revert it every and every time.

Regards
   Klaus
- -- 
Klaus Ethgen      http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub  4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16   Klaus Ethgen 
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753  62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=uWye
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
vcs-home mailing list
vcs-home@lists.madduck.net
http://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-home


Re: Lost Repository Was: Removing git-annex Repo

2011-12-04 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hi,

Am So den  4. Dez 2011 um 22:17 schrieb Joey Hess:
> It certianly looks like a bug.

Ok.

> I cannot even think of how it would be changing git-annex:uuid.log
> when all you did is a drop, and particularly if there was no
> auto-merge of another git-annex branch.

There was, but tist is many commits ago now.

> Can you check out the git-annex branch and run git-log on uuid.log, 
> and see what the most recent change to it looked like?

It is an update. After that I revert this update and the next time it
will purged again.

> Do you have any clues how I can set up a repository that replicates this
> behavior?

I did nothing special. I'll try to create a demo.

Gruß
   Klaus
- -- 
Klaus Ethgen  http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub  4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16   Klaus Ethgen 
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753  62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=akar
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
vcs-home mailing list
vcs-home@lists.madduck.net
http://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-home


Re: Lost Repository Was: Removing git-annex Repo

2011-12-04 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hello Joey,

Am So den  4. Dez 2011 um  2:02 schrieb Joey Hess:
> > Am Fr den  2. Dez 2011 um 21:54 schrieb Klaus Ethgen:
> > > Not only that, also a "git annex fsck" will bring it back. But I wonder
> > > where it gets the description and ID of the old remote.
> > 
> > Now I have the same problem but only way around.
> > 
> > I did create a new git and annex. Filled it with annexed content and
> > pushed all to a second new created repository.
> > 
> > Now I cloned the first to an other machine and did git annex init Blafoo
> > inside. After push I was thinking that everything is ok. But it wasn't.
> > Every time I fsck or add new files or otherwise do annex stuff it trows
> > out the cloned repository from trust.log and uuid.log.
> > 
> > I use version 3.2022 from Debian at the moment.
> 
> I don't entirely understand your description of the problem.
> I'd appreciate a proper bug report with full details; transcripts, etc.

At the moment I am not absolutely sure of the bug or not.

Lets make an example.

   > git annex status
   supported backends: SHA256 SHA1 SHA512 SHA224 SHA384 SHA256E SHA1E SHA512E 
SHA224E SHA384E WORM URL
   supported remote types: git S3 bup directory rsync web hook
   trusted repositories: 1
   ---- -- Backup
   semitrusted repositories: 2
   ----0001 -- web
   ---- -- here (Master)
   untrusted repositories: 1
   ---- -- Clone
   local annex keys: 42
   local annex size: 1 gigabyte
   visible annex keys: 42
   visible annex size: 1 gigabyte
   backend usage: 
   SHA256: 42
   > git annex drop file/name
   drop file/name ok
   > git annex status
   supported backends: SHA256 SHA1 SHA512 SHA224 SHA384 SHA256E SHA1E SHA512E 
SHA224E SHA384E WORM URL
   supported remote types: git S3 bup directory rsync web hook
   trusted repositories: 1
   ---- -- Backup
   semitrusted repositories: 2
   ----0001 -- web
   ---- -- here (Master)
   untrusted repositories: 0
   local annex keys: 41
   local annex size: 1 gigabyte
   visible annex keys: 42
   visible annex size: 1 gigabyte
   backend usage: 
   SHA256: 42
   >

And no Clone repository anymore. But it is still a valid repository and
in this case it ist one of the repositories that still has the dropped
file!

I never before see that issue.

> > That leads me again to the question where annex do have its store what
> > it like and what not?
> 
> http://git-annex.branchable.com/internals/

Hmm.. That is more or less what I observed.

Regards
   Klaus
- -- 
Klaus Ethgen  http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub  4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16   Klaus Ethgen 
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753  62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=d2Zs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
vcs-home mailing list
vcs-home@lists.madduck.net
http://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-home


Lost Repository Was: Removing git-annex Repo

2011-12-03 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Am Fr den  2. Dez 2011 um 21:54 schrieb Klaus Ethgen:
> Not only that, also a "git annex fsck" will bring it back. But I wonder
> where it gets the description and ID of the old remote.

Now I have the same problem but only way around.

I did create a new git and annex. Filled it with annexed content and
pushed all to a second new created repository.

Now I cloned the first to an other machine and did git annex init Blafoo
inside. After push I was thinking that everything is ok. But it wasn't.
Every time I fsck or add new files or otherwise do annex stuff it trows
out the cloned repository from trust.log and uuid.log.

That leads me again to the question where annex do have its store what
it like and what not?

I use version 3.2022 from Debian at the moment.

Regards
   Klaus
- -- 
Klaus Ethgen  http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub  4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16   Klaus Ethgen 
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753  62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=qCcI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
vcs-home mailing list
vcs-home@lists.madduck.net
http://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-home


Re: Removing git-annex Repo

2011-12-02 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hiho,

Am Fr den  2. Dez 2011 um 21:18 schrieb Joey Hess:
> Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> > is there a other way than "git checkout git-annex; sed -i -e
> > '//d' **/*(.); git commit -a; git checkout master" to remove a
> > repository completely from annex knowledge?
> 
> Well, that doesn't actually work;

I felt it.

> if you do that and then pull a independantly changed git-annex branch
> from a remote, the auto-union-merge will then add back all the lines
> you removed.

Not only that, also a "git annex fsck" will bring it back. But I wonder
where it gets the description and ID of the old remote.

> Marking the repository untrusted is the usual way.

I red about. But I want to wipe out the whole repository and don't want
to have inherited waste.

And yes, I can do the cleanup on all remotes too.

Regards
   Klaus
- -- 
Klaus Ethgen      http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub  4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16   Klaus Ethgen 
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753  62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=6Fqo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
vcs-home mailing list
vcs-home@lists.madduck.net
http://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-home


Removing git-annex Repo

2011-12-02 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hi all,

is there a other way than "git checkout git-annex; sed -i -e
'//d' **/*(.); git commit -a; git checkout master" to remove a
repository completely from annex knowledge?

Regards
   Klaus
- -- 
Klaus Ethgen  http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub  4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16   Klaus Ethgen 
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753  62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=ErBb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
vcs-home mailing list
vcs-home@lists.madduck.net
http://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-home