Re: [vpp-dev] bond

[Steven Luong (sluong)]

Yes, I started adding LACP in VPP native mode, not tied to DPDK. So you can 
actually enslave additional NICs using CLI without restarting VPP.

Steven

From:  on behalf of "yug...@telincn.com" 

Date: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 at 7:41 PM
To: "John Lo (loj)" , otroan 
Cc: vpp-dev 
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] bond

Thanks,  is there a plan to surpport 802.3ad?

Regards,
Ewan

ewan

From: John Lo (loj)
Date: 2018-01-04 00:05
To: yug...@telincn.com; 
otroan
CC: vpp-dev
Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] bond
VPP does support static interface bonding via DPDK link bonding PMD:
http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/prog_guide/link_bonding_poll_mode_drv_lib.html

VPP works with mode 1 (active backup) and mode 2 (balanced XOR).  There is no 
support for mode 4 which is 802.3ad.  The bonded interfaces and their slaves 
must be specified in the startup config via the “vdev” config for DPDK. The 
sample src/vpp/conf/startup.conf does provide samples for both mode 1 and mode2:

## Specify bonded interface and its slaves via PCI addresses
##
## Bonded interface in XOR load balance mode (mode 2) with L3 and L4 headers
# vdev eth_bond0,mode=2,slave=:02:00.0,slave=:03:00.0,xmit_policy=l34
# vdev eth_bond1,mode=2,slave=:02:00.1,slave=:03:00.1,xmit_policy=l34
##
## Bonded interface in Active-Back up mode (mode 1)
# vdev eth_bond0,mode=1,slave=:02:00.0,slave=:03:00.0
# vdev eth_bond1,mode=1,slave=:02:00.1,slave=:03:00.1

Regards,
John

From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On 
Behalf Of yug...@telincn.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2018 5:06 AM
To: otroan 
Cc: vpp-dev 
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] bond

Ole,
I found out that there is only one way  to do this,  write them into the vpp 
start-up.conf, but there is no cmd to do such task, am I right?

Regards,
Ewan

ewan

From: Ole Troan
Date: 2018-01-03 17:58
To: yug...@telincn.com
CC: Jim Thompson; lin 
huang; vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] bond
Ewan,

> Yes, I need 802.3ad interface, is there a way to do it?

Of course. Just implement it. ;-)

Or use ECMP at layer 3.

Best regards,
Ole

>
> Regards,
> Ewan
> ewan  yugang
> 杭州全维技术股份有限公司 北京研发部门
> 手机：17310665879
> Q Q  : 185237808
> 邮箱：yug...@telincn.com
> 地址：北京市朝阳区望京西路金隅国际G座2305
> 网站：http://www.telincn.com
>
> From: Ole Troan
> Date: 2018-01-03 17:40
> To: Jim Thompson
> CC: lin huang; yug...@telincn.com; vpp-dev
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] bond
> Jim,
>
> > src/vnet/ethernet/ptp_ethernet*
> >
> > https://github.com/FDio/vpp/commit/15ac81c16fba83033090299413a3a2dbb848a0f9
>
> P2P Ethernet is a different thing altogether.
> P2P Ethernet is a mechanism to emulate L3 P2P links on top of a shared (or 
> non shared) Ethernet link.
>
> Ewan is asking for 802.3ad presumably?
>
> Cheers,
> Ole
>
>
> >
> > On Jan 3, 2018, at 2:57 AM, lin huang 
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi yugang,
> >>  It seems that vpp doesn’t support that features.
> >>
> >> Refer to: https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Features
> >>
> >> From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io 
> >> [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of 
> >> yug...@telincn.com
> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 4:52 PM
> >> To: vpp-dev >
> >> Subject: [vpp-dev] bond
> >>
> >> HI all,
> >> Does vpp surpport interface bond ? How do I  configure them?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Ewan
> >>
> >> ewan
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> vpp-dev mailing list
> >> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> >> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
> > ___
> > vpp-dev mailing list
> > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] Unable to add NIC to VPP

[Shiv Dev]

Hi Dave,

Thanks for the response.

There is no support for the realtek driver in dpdk (http://dpdk.org/doc/nics).
When I moved to a server with an X540 interface, I see the interface comes
up in vpp..

  vpp# show interface
  Name   Idx   State  Counter
Count
TenGigabitEthernet81/0/0  1 up   rx packets


Regards,
Shiv

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 12:19 AM, Dave Wallace  wrote:

> Shiv,
>
> You need to verify that there is a DPDK driver for the device you are
> trying to use.
>
> If there is a DPDK driver, then you will need to add a case for it in the
> vpp dpdk driver initialization function in .../vpp/src/plugins/dpdk/
> device/init.c
>
> Finally you will need to test VPP with the driver to make sure that it
> works.
> Not all DPDK drivers are created equal ;)
>
> Hope this helps,
> -daw-
>
> On 1/2/2018 12:34 PM, Shiv Dev wrote:
>
>
> Hi VPP Team,
>
>  I am trying to add a NIC to using the instructions in
> https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/How_To_Connect_A_PCI_Interface_To_VPP.
>
> I do not see the interface being created in vpp and see the following
> errors in the /var/log/syslog..
>
> Jan  2 22:50:48 shiv-lenovo-v310 vpp[3453]: /usr/bin/vpp[3453]:
> dpdk_bind_devices_to_uio:758: Unsupported PCI device 0x10ec:0x8168 found at
> PCI address :02:00.0
> ..
>
> From the code in src/plugins/dpdk/device/init.c: dpdk_bind_devices_to_uio(),
> I see that the above device (realtek device vendor id = 0x10ec) is not
> supported. Does an additional "else if" need to be added to support realtek
> devices  or am I missing something obvious here ?
>
> Regards,
> Shiv
>
> ---
>
> shiv@shiv-lenovo-v310:~$ lsmod | grep igb_uio
> igb_uio16384  0
> uio20480  2 uio_pci_generic,igb_uio
>
> From /etc/vpp/startup.conf..
>
> ## Whitelist specific interface by specifying PCI address
> dev :02:00.0
>
> vpp# show pci
> Address  Sock VID:PID Link Speed   Driver  Product Name
> Vital Product Data
> :02:00.0  10ec:8168   2.5 GT/s x1  igb_uio
>
>
> vpp# show interface
>   Name   Idx   State  Counter
> Count
> local00down
>
>
>
>
> ___
> vpp-dev mailing 
> listvpp-...@lists.fd.iohttps://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
>
>
>
> ___
> vpp-dev mailing list
> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
>
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] bond

[yug...@telincn.com]

Thanks,  is there a plan to surpport 802.3ad?

Regards,
Ewan


ewan
 
From: John Lo (loj)
Date: 2018-01-04 00:05
To: yug...@telincn.com; otroan
CC: vpp-dev
Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] bond
VPP does support static interface bonding via DPDK link bonding PMD:
http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/prog_guide/link_bonding_poll_mode_drv_lib.html
 
VPP works with mode 1 (active backup) and mode 2 (balanced XOR).  There is no 
support for mode 4 which is 802.3ad.  The bonded interfaces and their slaves 
must be specified in the startup config via the “vdev” config for DPDK. The 
sample src/vpp/conf/startup.conf does provide samples for both mode 1 and mode2:
 
## Specify bonded interface and its slaves via PCI addresses
##
## Bonded interface in XOR load balance mode (mode 2) with L3 and L4 headers 
# vdev eth_bond0,mode=2,slave=:02:00.0,slave=:03:00.0,xmit_policy=l34
# vdev eth_bond1,mode=2,slave=:02:00.1,slave=:03:00.1,xmit_policy=l34
##
## Bonded interface in Active-Back up mode (mode 1)
# vdev eth_bond0,mode=1,slave=:02:00.0,slave=:03:00.0
# vdev eth_bond1,mode=1,slave=:02:00.1,slave=:03:00.1
 
Regards,
John
 
From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On 
Behalf Of yug...@telincn.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2018 5:06 AM
To: otroan 
Cc: vpp-dev 
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] bond
 
Ole,
I found out that there is only one way  to do this,  write them into the vpp 
start-up.conf, but there is no cmd to do such task, am I right?
 
Regards,
Ewan


ewan
 
From: Ole Troan
Date: 2018-01-03 17:58
To: yug...@telincn.com
CC: Jim Thompson; lin huang; vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] bond
Ewan,
 
> Yes, I need 802.3ad interface, is there a way to do it?
 
Of course. Just implement it. ;-)
 
Or use ECMP at layer 3.
 
Best regards,
Ole
 
> 
> Regards,
> Ewan
> ewan  yugang
> 杭州全维技术股份有限公司 北京研发部门
> 手机：17310665879
> Q Q  : 185237808
> 邮箱：yug...@telincn.com
> 地址：北京市朝阳区望京西路金隅国际G座2305
> 网站：http://www.telincn.com
> 
> From: Ole Troan
> Date: 2018-01-03 17:40
> To: Jim Thompson
> CC: lin huang; yug...@telincn.com; vpp-dev
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] bond
> Jim,
> 
> > src/vnet/ethernet/ptp_ethernet*
> >
> > https://github.com/FDio/vpp/commit/15ac81c16fba83033090299413a3a2dbb848a0f9
> 
> P2P Ethernet is a different thing altogether.
> P2P Ethernet is a mechanism to emulate L3 P2P links on top of a shared (or 
> non shared) Ethernet link.
> 
> Ewan is asking for 802.3ad presumably?
> 
> Cheers,
> Ole
> 
> 
> >
> > On Jan 3, 2018, at 2:57 AM, lin huang  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi yugang,
> >>  It seems that vpp doesn’t support that features.
> >>
> >> Refer to: https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Features
> >>
> >> From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On 
> >> Behalf Of yug...@telincn.com
> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 4:52 PM
> >> To: vpp-dev 
> >> Subject: [vpp-dev] bond
> >>
> >> HI all,
> >> Does vpp surpport interface bond ? How do I  configure them?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Ewan
> >>
> >> ewan
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> vpp-dev mailing list
> >> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> >> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
> > ___
> > vpp-dev mailing list
> > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
 
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

[vpp-dev] Stepping down as NSH_SFC PTL

[Zhou, Danny]

Hi TSC,
I've been taking the NSH_SFC PTL role 1 year ago. It has been a pleasure, but 
also a burden as there are some personal reasons make me cannot focus on 
NSH_SFC anymore, so I am stepping down as NSH_SFC PTL with immediate effect. 
Additionally, I would like to nominate Hongjun Ni, who is the most active 
NSH_SFC maintainer in 2017, as new NSH_SFC PTL for his excellent contribution 
as below:

l  Upstreamed 42 patches totally cover Ingress Classifier, SFF, Egress 
Classifier, NSH-Proxy, NSH-aware NAT, MD-Type2, NSH over Ethernet and NSH TTL.

l  Published four NSH_SFC Releases: 17.01, 17.04, 17.07 and 17.10.

NSH_SFC maintainers,

Pls vote for Hongjun Ni by directly replying this email.

-Danny
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP does not detect NIC automatically

[Dave Barach (dbarach)]

Dear Charlie,

Vpp won't touch an interface if it has an associated Linux kernel interface 
which is up, and/or has an address configured on it. Manually unbinding the 
interface - as you did - makes the Linux kernel interface disappear.

Accidentally whitelisting a host's management ethernet would be a Bad Thing. 
"Hmmm... Why can't I ping the box anymore, let alone ssh to it..."

HTH... Dave

From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On 
Behalf Of Li, Charlie
Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 2:29 PM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: [vpp-dev] VPP does not detect NIC automatically

Hi VPP team,

I am new to VPP and am following the "FDIO Quick Start Guide" 
(https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zqYN7qMavgbdkPWIJIrsPXlxNOZ_GhEveHQxpYr3qrg/edit)
 to get started.

I am running Ubuntu 16.04 and using the pre-built packages.

According to the document, vpp should detect and take over the Ethernet ports 
that are not in use (link down). But on my system, vpp does not detect any 
interfaces except the "local0".

# ps -eaf | grep vpp
root991  1 99 Nov28 ?2-06:13:50 /usr/bin/vpp -c 
/etc/vpp/startup.conf
root  83025  83014  0 15:34 pts/800:00:00 grep --color=auto vpp

# lspci
...
01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ 
Network Connection (rev 01)
01:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ 
Network Connection (rev 01)
...

# vppctl show int
  Name   Idx   State  Counter  Count
local00down

Then I add the two interfaces to the whitelist in startup.conf

## Whitelist specific interface by specifying PCI address
dev :01:00.0
dev :01:00.1

And restart vpp, but it still does not detect the interfaces.

As a workaround, I manually bind the interfaces

~/dpdk/usertools/dpdk-devbind.py -b uio_pci_generic :01:00.0
~/dpdk/usertools/dpdk-devbind.py -b uio_pci_generic :01:00.1

And restart vpp; now everything starts to work.

Is this as expected or did I miss something?


Regards,
Charlie Li

___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

[vpp-dev] VPP does not detect NIC automatically

[Li, Charlie]

Hi VPP team,

I am new to VPP and am following the "FDIO Quick Start Guide" 
(https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zqYN7qMavgbdkPWIJIrsPXlxNOZ_GhEveHQxpYr3qrg/edit)
 to get started.

I am running Ubuntu 16.04 and using the pre-built packages.

According to the document, vpp should detect and take over the Ethernet ports 
that are not in use (link down). But on my system, vpp does not detect any 
interfaces except the "local0".

# ps -eaf | grep vpp
root991  1 99 Nov28 ?2-06:13:50 /usr/bin/vpp -c 
/etc/vpp/startup.conf
root  83025  83014  0 15:34 pts/800:00:00 grep --color=auto vpp

# lspci
...
01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ 
Network Connection (rev 01)
01:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ 
Network Connection (rev 01)
...

# vppctl show int
  Name   Idx   State  Counter  Count
local00down

Then I add the two interfaces to the whitelist in startup.conf

## Whitelist specific interface by specifying PCI address
dev :01:00.0
dev :01:00.1

And restart vpp, but it still does not detect the interfaces.

As a workaround, I manually bind the interfaces

~/dpdk/usertools/dpdk-devbind.py -b uio_pci_generic :01:00.0
~/dpdk/usertools/dpdk-devbind.py -b uio_pci_generic :01:00.1

And restart vpp; now everything starts to work.

Is this as expected or did I miss something?


Regards,
Charlie Li

___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] api functions using shared memory

[Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)]

+csit-dev

In CSIT we are after clocks per node data, but may need all info from “show 
run” output to automatically qualify the “show run” output values. Is your 
patch ge9483 going to get us there?

-Maciek

On 30 Nov 2017, at 14:15, Luke, Chris 
> wrote:

Which “show run” info? The stats in the header are calculated and some of the 
base values needed for it are missing in the current API; I intend to fix 
precisely that with this work since they are ideal summary lines for ‘vpptop’.

Chris.

From: Gabriel Ganne [mailto:gabriel.ga...@enea.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 9:02 AM
To: Luke, Chris 
>; Ole Troan 
>
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] api functions using shared memory


Chris,

It seems your work in https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/9483/ does all what Maciek and 
Dave discussed in VPP-55.

Thanks again !



--

Gabriel Ganne


From: Gabriel Ganne
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 2:52:06 PM
To: Luke, Chris; Ole Troan
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] api functions using shared memory


Actually, during the CSIT weekly call yesterday there was mentioned a missing 
VPP api for "show run".

I think I even found a jira for it : https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-55



It seemed like no one was working on it, and so I had a look.

In the ticket, Dave Barach  suggested to add this to the get_node_graph api 
function which is why I went there.



If you could add the infos from "show run" into your dev, this would be great.

Otherwise I can work on it after you've finished. There's no rush.



Regards,



--

Gabriel Ganne


From: Luke, Chris >
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 2:39:02 PM
To: Gabriel Ganne; Ole Troan
Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] api functions using shared memory


What data for each node are you looking for? So I can make sure it ends up 
included. The existing get_node_graph is fairly limited in what it retrieves 
aside from the adjacencies and a handful of stats.



My approach right now, to keep it simple, is to use the _dump/_details 
mechanism to return a list of items that encode the thread index and node index 
with the other details in a pretty flat structure; this should then be easily 
consumed by any binding. For Python I’ll also provide a way to reanimate the 
data into a fairly simple object model.



You can see the first pass of my work at 
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/9222/
 and the two patches leading up to it which exposed a mechanism to interpret 
the result_in_shmem from Python and dezerialize into an object model. Ole 
rightly objects to using shmem, though I think there is still merit in merging 
the basic shmem reader since, while the mechanism exists in the API, we should 
support it where we can. Otherwise we should remove it from the API altogether.



My current work on this I expect to have cleaned up and usable in a few days, 
though I’m travelling next week (Kubecon) which may interrupt things if I don’t 
make enough progress this week.



Chris.



From: Gabriel Ganne [mailto:gabriel.ga...@enea.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 7:47 AM
To: Ole Troan >; Luke, Chris 
>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] api functions using shared memory



Great !

Thanks.



--

Gabriel Ganne





From: Ole Troan >
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 12:50
To: Gabriel Ganne
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] api functions using shared memory



Gabriel,

> I am looking at the get_node_graph() api function, for use in python.
> It returns  a u64 reply_in_shmem value which points to the shared memory and 
> must then be processed by vlib_node_unserialize() (as is done in vat) but I 
> only saw such a function in C.
> Is there any way to do this in python ? (other languages should have the same 
> issue).
>
> Also, I had a look at the the cli api function (which works the same way) and 
> saw that it had an cli_inband version which apparently was designed to 
> replace the cli api function because it was using shared memory 
> 

Re: [vpp-dev] bond

[Ole Troan]

Ewan,

> Yes, I need 802.3ad interface, is there a way to do it?

Of course. Just implement it. ;-)

Or use ECMP at layer 3.

Best regards,
Ole

> 
> Regards,
> Ewan
> ewan  yugang
> 杭州全维技术股份有限公司 北京研发部门
> 手机：17310665879
> Q Q  : 185237808
> 邮箱：yug...@telincn.com
> 地址：北京市朝阳区望京西路金隅国际G座2305
> 网站：http://www.telincn.com
> 
> From: Ole Troan
> Date: 2018-01-03 17:40
> To: Jim Thompson
> CC: lin huang; yug...@telincn.com; vpp-dev
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] bond
> Jim,
> 
> > src/vnet/ethernet/ptp_ethernet*
> >
> > https://github.com/FDio/vpp/commit/15ac81c16fba83033090299413a3a2dbb848a0f9
> 
> P2P Ethernet is a different thing altogether.
> P2P Ethernet is a mechanism to emulate L3 P2P links on top of a shared (or 
> non shared) Ethernet link.
> 
> Ewan is asking for 802.3ad presumably?
> 
> Cheers,
> Ole
> 
> 
> >
> > On Jan 3, 2018, at 2:57 AM, lin huang  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi yugang,
> >>  It seems that vpp doesn’t support that features.
> >>
> >> Refer to: https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Features
> >>
> >> From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On 
> >> Behalf Of yug...@telincn.com
> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 4:52 PM
> >> To: vpp-dev 
> >> Subject: [vpp-dev] bond
> >>
> >> HI all,
> >> Does vpp surpport interface bond ? How do I  configure them?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Ewan
> >>
> >> ewan
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> vpp-dev mailing list
> >> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> >> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
> > ___
> > vpp-dev mailing list
> > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] bond

[yug...@telincn.com]

Hi Ole,
Yes, I need 802.3ad interface, is there a way to do it?

Regards,
Ewan


ewan  yugang
杭州全维技术股份有限公司 北京研发部门
手机：17310665879
Q Q  : 185237808
邮箱：yug...@telincn.com
地址：北京市朝阳区望京西路金隅国际G座2305
网站：http://www.telincn.com
 
From: Ole Troan
Date: 2018-01-03 17:40
To: Jim Thompson
CC: lin huang; yug...@telincn.com; vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] bond
Jim,
 
> src/vnet/ethernet/ptp_ethernet*
> 
> https://github.com/FDio/vpp/commit/15ac81c16fba83033090299413a3a2dbb848a0f9
 
P2P Ethernet is a different thing altogether.
P2P Ethernet is a mechanism to emulate L3 P2P links on top of a shared (or non 
shared) Ethernet link.
 
Ewan is asking for 802.3ad presumably?
 
Cheers,
Ole
 
 
> 
> On Jan 3, 2018, at 2:57 AM, lin huang  wrote:
> 
>> Hi yugang,
>>  It seems that vpp doesn’t support that features.
>> 
>> Refer to: https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Features
>> 
>> From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On 
>> Behalf Of yug...@telincn.com
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 4:52 PM
>> To: vpp-dev 
>> Subject: [vpp-dev] bond
>> 
>> HI all,
>> Does vpp surpport interface bond ? How do I  configure them?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Ewan
>> 
>> ewan
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> vpp-dev mailing list
>> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
>> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
> ___
> vpp-dev mailing list
> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
 
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] bond

[Ole Troan]

Jim,

> src/vnet/ethernet/ptp_ethernet*
> 
> https://github.com/FDio/vpp/commit/15ac81c16fba83033090299413a3a2dbb848a0f9

P2P Ethernet is a different thing altogether.
P2P Ethernet is a mechanism to emulate L3 P2P links on top of a shared (or non 
shared) Ethernet link.

Ewan is asking for 802.3ad presumably?

Cheers,
Ole


> 
> On Jan 3, 2018, at 2:57 AM, lin huang  wrote:
> 
>> Hi yugang,
>>  It seems that vpp doesn’t support that features.
>> 
>> Refer to: https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Features
>> 
>> From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On 
>> Behalf Of yug...@telincn.com
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 4:52 PM
>> To: vpp-dev 
>> Subject: [vpp-dev] bond
>> 
>> HI all,
>> Does vpp surpport interface bond ? How do I  configure them?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Ewan
>> 
>> ewan
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> vpp-dev mailing list
>> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
>> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
> ___
> vpp-dev mailing list
> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] bond

[lin huang]

Hi yugang,
 It seems that vpp doesn’t support that features.

Refer to: https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Features

From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On 
Behalf Of yug...@telincn.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 4:52 PM
To: vpp-dev 
Subject: [vpp-dev] bond

HI all,
Does vpp surpport interface bond ? How do I  configure them?

Regards,
Ewan


ewan


___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

[vpp-dev] bond

[yug...@telincn.com]

HI all,
Does vpp surpport interface bond ? How do I  configure them?

Regards,
Ewan



ewan  

___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev