Re: [webkit-dev] request of "canconfirm-bit"
Thank you. Darin I will add comments on the bug. BR, Zheng (2013/01/17 11:40), Darin Adler wrote: On Jan 16, 2013, at 2:54 PM, 徐征 wrote: So, how can I get assign for this issue(and make the status to ASSIGNED)? You don’t need to. You can add comments and post a patch without having the bug formally assigned to you. In fact, we don’t normally pay all that much attention to the Assigned To field. -- Darin ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] request of "canconfirm-bit"
On Jan 16, 2013, at 2:54 PM, 徐征 wrote: > So, how can I get assign for this issue(and make the status to ASSIGNED)? You don’t need to. You can add comments and post a patch without having the bug formally assigned to you. In fact, we don’t normally pay all that much attention to the Assigned To field. -- Darin ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] request of "canconfirm-bit"
Thank you Adam and Darin So, how can I get assign for this issue(and make the status to ASSIGNED)? Should I get connect with reporter? Now I am reading http://www.webkit.org/quality/lifecycle.html. Zheng (2013/01/17 2:25), Darin Adler wrote: On Jan 16, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Adam Barth wrote: We more or less ignore the "is confirmed" bit in bugs.webkit.org. I believe it’s possible to rename UNCONFIRMED to NEW and delete NEW so we can get rid of this distinction that we don’t make use of. Might be worth doing at some point to reduce confusion. -- Darin ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] request of "canconfirm-bit"
On Jan 16, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Adam Barth wrote: > We more or less ignore the "is confirmed" bit in bugs.webkit.org. I believe it’s possible to rename UNCONFIRMED to NEW and delete NEW so we can get rid of this distinction that we don’t make use of. Might be worth doing at some point to reduce confusion. -- Darin ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] request of "canconfirm-bit"
We more or less ignore the "is confirmed" bit in bugs.webkit.org. Adam On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:35 AM, 徐征 wrote: > Hello everyone > > This is Zheng and nice to meet you. > > I want to confirm some > issue(https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78957) and try to create > patch for it. > However, it seems I need "canconfirm-bit" based on > http://www.webkit.org/quality/bugzilla.html > So, could someone give me the right to confirm and fix it. > > BR, > Zheng > > ___ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
[webkit-dev] request of "canconfirm-bit"
Hello everyone This is Zheng and nice to meet you. I want to confirm some issue(https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78957) and try to create patch for it. However, it seems I need "canconfirm-bit" based on http://www.webkit.org/quality/bugzilla.html So, could someone give me the right to confirm and fix it. BR, Zheng ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
