[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (CDITCK-607) EnterpriseBeanDiscoveryTest assumes that AnnotatedType class must reflect the @Local interface, but this is not backed by the spec
Title: Message Title Mark Struberg created an issue CDI TCK / CDITCK-607 EnterpriseBeanDiscoveryTest assumes that AnnotatedType class must reflect the @Local interface, but this is not backed by the spec Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 2.0.3.Final Assignee: Matej Novotny Components: Tests Created: 07/Feb/18 12:57 PM Fix Versions: TBD Priority: Major Reporter: Mark Struberg EnterpriseBeanDiscoveryTest assumes that AnnotatedType class must reflect the @Local interface, but this is not backed by the spec. The TCK tests in question all refer to 26.1 and 26.2, but this dose nowhere even mention @Local. Furthermore the old spec didn't define this but the 'type of the EJB class which is parsed' Add Comment
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (CDITCK-608) LongRunningConversationLifecycleEventTest and others wrongly assume that Session get destroyed at shutdown
Title: Message Title Mark Struberg created an issue CDI TCK / CDITCK-608 LongRunningConversationLifecycleEventTest and others wrongly assume that Session get destroyed at shutdown Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 2.0.3.Final Assignee: Matej Novotny Components: Tests Created: 07/Feb/18 4:06 PM Priority: Major Reporter: Mark Struberg Some tests wrongly assume that the Servlet Sessions will all get destroyed during shutdown. But that is not necessarily the case. An undeploy or shudown might passivate the Session to a storage and pick it up later again. This is perfectly valid from a Servlet perspective and CDI must follow those rules. Add Comment
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2458) OSGi - import javax.ejb optionally
Title: Message Title Martin Kouba updated an issue Weld / WELD-2458 OSGi - import javax.ejb optionally Change By: Martin Kouba Fix Version/s: 3.0.3.Final Fix Version/s: 2.4.7.Final Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005-sha1:fd8c849) ___ weld-issues mailing list weld-issues@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2458) OSGi - import javax.ejb optionally
Title: Message Title Martin Kouba updated WELD-2458 Weld / WELD-2458 OSGi - import javax.ejb optionally Change By: Martin Kouba Status: Pull Request Sent Resolved Resolution: Done Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005-sha1:fd8c849) ___ weld-issues mailing list weld-issues@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2459) Ignore module-info during discovery
Title: Message Title Martin Kouba updated WELD-2459 Weld / WELD-2459 Ignore module-info during discovery Change By: Martin Kouba Status: Open Pull Request Sent Git Pull Request: https://github.com/weld/core/pull/1788 Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005-sha1:fd8c849) ___ weld-issues mailing list weld-issues@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (CDITCK-606) org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.deployment.discovery.enterprise.annotated.EnterpriseDefaultBeanDiscoveryModeTest should fail because of ambiguous beans
Title: Message Title Mark Struberg created an issue CDI TCK / CDITCK-606 org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.deployment.discovery.enterprise.annotated.EnterpriseDefaultBeanDiscoveryModeTest should fail because of ambiguous beans Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 2.0.3.Final Assignee: Matej Novotny Components: Tests Created: 07/Feb/18 6:10 AM Priority: Major Reporter: Mark Struberg org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.deployment.discovery.enterprise.annotated.EnterpriseDefaultBeanDiscoveryModeTest contains a class AppleTrea which has 2 producer for the same class+qualifier plus only one disposal method. @Produces static Apple apple = new Apple(); @Produces
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (CDITCK-606) org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.deployment.discovery.enterprise.annotated.EnterpriseDefaultBeanDiscoveryModeTest should fail because of ambiguous beans
Title: Message Title Matej Novotny resolved as Rejected This test verifies just the discovery of producer/disposer/observer method and producer field on an EJB, not injection itself. So we have one injection point (Apple) but... There is no injection point in that test. Hence there is no AmbiguousResolutionException. Note that for disposer methods, the parameter annotated @Disposes is not an injection point. Looking at spec 3.4.2: Declaring disposer method: A disposer method may be declared by annotating a parameter @javax.enterprise.inject.Disposes. That parameter is the disposed parameter. Qualifiers may be declared by annotating the disposed parameter And a bit further it adds: In addition to the disposed parameter, a disposer method may declare additional parameters, which may also specify qualifiers. These additional parameters are injection points. One of the reasons, why it cannot be an IP is (spec link): A disposer method may resolve to multiple producer methods or producer fields declared by the bean class CDI TCK / CDITCK-606 org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.deployment.discovery.enterprise.annotated.EnterpriseDefaultBeanDiscoveryModeTest should fail because of ambiguous beans Change By: Matej Novotny Status: Open Resolved Resolution: Rejected
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2463) ProbeObserversTest relies on a specific java.lang.annotation.Annotation.toString() implementation
Title: Message Title Martin Kouba updated an issue Weld / WELD-2463 ProbeObserversTest relies on a specific java.lang.annotation.Annotation.toString() implementation Change By: Martin Kouba Component/s: Development Tools (Probe) Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005-sha1:fd8c849) ___ weld-issues mailing list weld-issues@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2463) ProbeObserversTest relies on a specific java.lang.annotation.Annotation.toString() implementation
Title: Message Title Martin Kouba created an issue Weld / WELD-2463 ProbeObserversTest relies on a specific java.lang.annotation.Annotation.toString() implementation Issue Type: Sub-task Assignee: Unassigned Created: 07/Feb/18 8:32 AM Priority: Major Reporter: Martin Kouba It seems that the impl differs in Oracle JDK 8 and Oracle JDK 9. We should either modify Probe to build annotation string representation (regardless of JDK version/impl) instead of using Annotation.toString() or modify the test. Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005-sha1:fd8c849)
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2462) Migrate from findbugs to spotbugs
Title: Message Title Martin Kouba updated WELD-2462 Weld / WELD-2462 Migrate from findbugs to spotbugs Change By: Martin Kouba Status: Pull Request Sent Resolved Resolution: Done Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005-sha1:fd8c849) ___ weld-issues mailing list weld-issues@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2459) Ignore module-info during discovery
Title: Message Title Martin Kouba updated WELD-2459 Weld / WELD-2459 Ignore module-info during discovery Change By: Martin Kouba Status: Pull Request Sent Resolved Resolution: Done Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005-sha1:fd8c849) ___ weld-issues mailing list weld-issues@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
