RE: [WSG] Font Replacement With PHP
Hi, Here's the URL http://artypapers.com/csshelppile/pcdtr/ Kind Regards Jacobus van Niekerk Creative Consultant web: http://www.catics.com/ | http://www.freelancecontractors.com tel: +27 21 982 7805 fax: +27 88 021 982 7805 Skype: catics1 This e-mail message is confidential and intended solely for the person to whom or the entity to which it is addressed. All the contents and any attachments remain the property of Catics Ltd unless so stated. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from reading, copying, using or disclosing this message to others. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this e-mail or by telephoning +27 21 9827805 and thereafter delete the message. Catics Ltd does not accept liability for any personal views expressed in this message. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Kennon Sent: 26 January 2006 04:22 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Font Replacement With PHP Hi, I recall, although from where unsure, a standards compliant method of "embedding" a font within a site with PHP. Can someone shed some insight on this? __ Respectfully, Christopher Kennon Principal/Designer/Programmer -Bushidodeep bushidodeep (http://bushidodeep.com/) ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ** -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.23/240 - Release Date: 2006/01/25 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
[WSG] Width / min-width and max-width
Just a quick qustion. Can you use "width", "min-width" and "max-width" at the same time? Here is the code: #test { width:774px; min-width: 774px; max-width: 999px; } #test element will be 774px, but should expand to 999px if the screen size is bigger. Any comments. Thanks Jacobus -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.23/99 - Release Date: 2005/09/12 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
WORK-A-ROUND: [WSG] Max / min-width issue IE6
Just did a bit more testing and found this css to do the job for me! I think this is a "ok" solution to use, since the css code is only for IE. * html #cont { /* IE Dynamic Expression to set the width */ width:expression(document.body.clientWidth <= 1024 ? "800px" : "1024px" ); border: 1px solid green; } If anybody have any other ideas please do send them. Kind Regards Jacobus van Niekerk Creative Consultant web: http://www.catics.com/ | http://www.azapi.com | http://www.freelancecontractors.com tel: +27 21 982 7805 fax: +27 88 021 982 7805 Skype: catics1 This e-mail message is confidential and intended solely for the person to whom or the entity to which it is addressed. All the contents and any attachments remain the property of Catics Ltd unless so stated. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from reading, copying, using or disclosing this message to others. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this e-mail or by telephoning +27 21 9827805 and thereafter delete the message. Catics Ltd does not accept liability for any personal views expressed in this message. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.16/83 - Release Date: 2005/08/26 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
[WSG] Max / min-width issue IE6
Any ideas, I have the following css: #testdiv { min-width: 800px !important; max-width: 1024px !important; border: 1px solid red; margin: 0 auto; text-align:right; } Firefox does 100% what it's suppose to do. It gives the #testdiv a min-width of 800px, so we are ok for 800x600 screens. And it gives a max-width of 1024px for bigger screens. IE 6.0 is not playing nicely ;). Any ideas to overcome this issue in IE. Here is just a few thoughts: 1. use a space gif after the footer. 2. use JavaScript to read width of screen and update css accord. 3. use inline css and server-side code to update the inline css. Any more comment? Thanks in advance. Kind Regards Jacobus van Niekerk Creative Consultant web: http://www.catics.com/ | http://www.azapi.com | http://www.freelancecontractors.com tel: +27 21 982 7805 fax: +27 88 021 982 7805 Skype: catics1 This e-mail message is confidential and intended solely for the person to whom or the entity to which it is addressed. All the contents and any attachments remain the property of Catics Ltd unless so stated. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from reading, copying, using or disclosing this message to others. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this e-mail or by telephoning +27 21 9827805 and thereafter delete the message. Catics Ltd does not accept liability for any personal views expressed in this message. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.16/83 - Release Date: 2005/08/26 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
[WSG] Nice plug-in for FireFox - Html Validator
Thought I just share this nice plug-in for FireFox, with everyone, helped me a lot with validating websites. It's based on HTMLTidy. https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?id=249 Kind Regards Jacobus van Niekerk Creative Consultant web: http://www.catics.com/ | http://www.azapi.com | http://www.freelancecontractors.com tel: +27 21 982 7805 fax: +27 88 021 982 7805 Skype: catics1 This e-mail message is confidential and intended solely for the person to whom or the entity to which it is addressed. All the contents and any attachments remain the property of Catics Ltd unless so stated. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from reading, copying, using or disclosing this message to others. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this e-mail or by telephoning +27 21 9827805 and thereafter delete the message. Catics Ltd does not accept liability for any personal views expressed in this message. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.15/80 - Release Date: 2005/08/23 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
[WSG] Exporting inline CSS
Hi all, Quick question, I have a client with lots of HTML file that have inline CSS. (Over 300 docs) I am looking for some software, or way, that will export this inline css into a external css file. Or even just move it into a embedded style sheet. Thanks in advance for any help. Kind Regards Jacobus van Niekerk Creative Consultant web: http://www.catics.com/ | http://www.freelancecontractors.com tel: + 27 21 982 7805 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
RE: [WSG] CSS Document layout/structure
I normally write my css to follow the structure of the xhtml: /* Main layout*/ ... ... /* Nav */ ... ... /* Sub nav */ ... ... /* Content */ ... ... /* Side Content */ ... ... /* Footer */ ... ... I also tend to split my css in different files. structure.css - keep all structure css Text.css - all text related formatting Small.css - used in style switcher to set text to small Medium.css - used in style switcher to set text to medium Large.css - used in style switcher to set text to large Hacks.css - any hacks I might use to help IE ;) I am open to other methods or ways of doing this Let us have a chat about this issue. Kind Regards Jacobus van Niekerk Creative Consultant web: http://www.catics.com/ | http://www.freelancecontractors.com tel: + 27 21 982 7805 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of C Slack Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 11:34 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] CSS Document layout/structure Hi, I am struggling to get to grips with designing with web standards and one of the problems I am having is with "reading" style sheets. Having sorted out the html code to make it more readable and modifiable it seems that we have shifted the "mess" to style sheets. Many of the sheets I look at are long, comment-less and very difficult to understand. So that I don't fall into the same trap, can anyone recommend some reading on how to make style sheet structure and layout both understandable and also easily modified? Thanks, Charlie -- ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ** -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.4 - Release Date: 4/6/2005 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
[WSG] Site review
Hi all, We have recently launched http://www.getawayafrica.com/, your comments are welcome. But would like to know more about if you have any problems with the site. Just a note, the client is still inputting content. Kind Regards Jacobus van Niekerk Creative Consultant web: http://www.catics.com/ | http://www.freelancecontractors.com tel: + 27 21 982 7805 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
RE: [WSG] Color "LCD Monitors vs traditional Monitors
I found using both works best... Get a video card the supports dual display and run both at the same time, you can then switch in-between the two monitors and view any colour differences Kind Regards Jacobus van Niekerk Creative Consultant web: http://www.catics.com/ | http://www.freelancecontractors.com | http://www.getawayafrica.com tel: + 27 21 982 7805 This e-mail message is confidential and intended solely for the person to whom or the entity to which it is addressed. All the contents and any attachments remain the property of Catics Ltd unless so stated. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from reading, copying, using or disclosing this message to others. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this e-mail or by telephoning +27 21 9827805 and thereafter delete the message. Catics Ltd does not accept liability for any personal views expressed in this message. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nancy Johnson Sent: 22 March 2005 04:18 PM To: webstandards group Subject: [WSG] Color "LCD Monitors vs traditional Monitors Dear Webstandards, Are there any articles or standards out there that talk about how to pick colors for both LCD and traditional monitors? I have a website that is an intense blue that looks great in a tradiational monitor but looks terrible in an LCD monitor. Nancy Johnson Do you Yahoo!? Make Yahoo! your home page <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/my/navbar/sethp/*http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs> -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.0 - Release Date: 2005/03/21 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
[WSG] Barclays Bank goes XHTML / CSS
Good news, Barclays just went standards with their new website. Congrats to them! Some work is still needed to fix all the validation errors, but at least they are try! I would off course help them out if they give me a shout. I hope more banks will follow their example soon. http://www.barclays.co.uk/ Kind Regards Jacobus van Niekerk Creative Consultant web: http://www.catics.com/ | http://www.freelancecontractors.com tel: + 27 21 982 7805 This e-mail message is confidential and intended solely for the person to whom or the entity to which it is addressed. All the contents and any attachments remain the property of Catics Ltd unless so stated. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from reading, copying, using or disclosing this message to others. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this e-mail or by telephoning +27 21 9827805 and thereafter delete the message. Catics Ltd does not accept liability for any personal views expressed in this message. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2005/02/22 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
RE: [WSG] Need some MAC screen grabs - Thx
Thanks I got what I needed. Kind Regards Jacobus van Niekerk Creative Consultant web: http://www.catics.com/ | http://www.freelancecontractors.com tel: + 27 21 982 7805 Jacobus van Niekerk wrote: > Hi all, > > I need the MAC girls & guys ;) to help me out. Can you please send me > a screen grab of the following url > > http://www.parachute.com/te/smallbusiness/ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date: 2005/02/14 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
[WSG] Need some MAC screen grabs
Hi all, I need the MAC girls & guys ;) to help me out. Can you please send me a screen grab of the following url http://www.parachute.com/te/smallbusiness/ Browsers: Safari 1.2 Netscape (which ever version you might have) Firefox 1+ Please send the screen grabs directly to me. Please don’t send them to the list! Kind Regards Jacobus van Niekerk Creative Consultant web: http://www.catics.com/ | http://www.freelancecontractors.com tel: + 27 21 982 7805 This e-mail message is confidential and intended solely for the person to whom or the entity to which it is addressed. All the contents and any attachments remain the property of Catics Ltd unless so stated. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from reading, copying, using or disclosing this message to others. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this e-mail or by telephoning +27 21 9827805 and thereafter delete the message. Catics Ltd does not accept liability for any personal views expressed in this message. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date: 2005/02/14 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
RE: [WSG] MSN redesign
Great, glad to see Microsoft getting out the closet and embracing web standards! Now lets hope they upgrade all the other MS sites. If so, I'll start to believe in MS again, as a forward thinking company, that works with us and not against. Kind Regards Jacobus van Niekerk Creative Consultant web: http://www.catics.com/ | http://www.freelancecontractors.com tel: + 27 21 982 7805 >>Anybody else notice that MSN.com now uses CSS? -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.2 - Release Date: 2005/01/28 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
RE: [WSG] Standards?
Here is some comments she might like ;) http://www.adaptivepath.com/publications/essays/archives/000266.php http://www.maxdesign.com.au/presentation/benefits/ Kind Regards Jacobus van Niekerk Creative Consultant web: http://www.catics.com/ | http://www.freelancecontractors.com tel: + 27 21 982 7805 This e-mail message is confidential and intended solely for the person to whom or the entity to which it is addressed. All the contents and any attachments remain the property of Catics Ltd unless so stated. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from reading, copying, using or disclosing this message to others. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this e-mail or by telephoning +27 21 9827805 and thereafter delete the message. Catics Ltd does not accept liability for any personal views expressed in this message. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of designer Sent: 01 February 2005 11:58 AM To: webstandards group Subject: [WSG] Standards? Good Day everyone: I have been doing the annual maintenance/update of a Holiday Home letting site I've had for a few years, so this year I attempted to convert it all to standards. It is now XHTML1 /CSS and most of it validates. (I say most because there is a bit of Flash and some of it uses frames). I have kept a couple of 'naughty' tables (as yet) because I simply haven't managed to convert to a stable/reliable alternative, but overall I was quite pleased with it. Anyway, as I had recently installed Firefox on the PC's in the office of this holiday business, I decided to show the owner how wonderful the update was [ :-) ]. I explained about standards to this (non-technical) person and, using Firefox developer's toolbar, I showed her the abysmal results of validating the sites of her competitors, and she was obviously pleased. She seemed to understand the basis of 'standards', but after a few minutes reflection she said: "I can appreciate that I am getting a 'quality' product, but from a practical point of view, what am I getting that improves my business? As far as visitors to my site are concerned there seems to be no advantage - after all, my competitor's sites may well be outdated, but they do actually WORK, so my customers don't see any benefit." Thought I'd pass this on . . . :-) Bob McClelland, Cornwall (U.K.) www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ** -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.2 - Release Date: 2005/01/28 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
[WSG] CSS / JavaScript Problem
Anybody have a solution for the following: I have a default style for a element: #s1 {height: 215px;} In some of the pages I need to update this value to auto, and I use !important setting to enforce this, via a updates.css file: #s1 {height: auto !important;} Now here is the problem: I now have to look at 2 elements, via JavaScript, in the doc, check which has the highest high value and assign that value to both elements. No matter what value I assign to both elements, the previous !important setting overrides the new values. Is there any way I can override the !important setting via JavaScript? I need a solution quite urgent, and will keep digging into this myself, but if anybody knows how, I would really appreciate this. Thanks in advance! Kind Regards Jacobus van Niekerk Creative Consultant web: http://www.catics.com/ | http://www.freelancecontractors.com tel: + 27 21 982 7805 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.4 - Release Date: 2005/01/25 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
RE: [WSG] setting height of a 'li' element
Also, You cannot assign width, or height to a element that has been set as a inline element, as far as I know ;) Kind Regards Jacobus van Niekerk Creative Consultant web: http://www.catics.com/ | http://www.freelancecontractors.com tel: + 27 21 982 7805 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.13 - Release Date: 2005/01/16 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
[WSG] Zero margin - just sharing
Hi all, I know a lot of people use this: * { margin:0; padding:0; } To help reduce code and eliminate lots of those strange default margins issues. Don't think this has been mentioned anywhere yet, but one issue I found with this, was that within dropdowns the "downarrow" GUI, covers some of the text on the right. Here is the fix for that: option { padding-right:1em; } Kind Regards Jacobus van Niekerk Creative Consultant web: http://www.catics.com/ | http://www.freelancecontractors.com tel: + 27 21 982 7805 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.11 - Release Date: 2005/01/12 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
RE: [WSG] Site review plz - Thank you.
>> The url: http://www.azapi.com/ Just a quick thank you to all that gave comments and suggestions! Kind Regards Jacobus van Niekerk -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.5.4 - Release Date: 2004/12/15 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
[WSG] Site review plz
Hi all, The url: http://www.azapi.com/ We are launching a new XHTML/CSS based CMS soon and would really appreciate your comments. We have launched the "brochureware" site already, and the CMS is 99% finished, it will launch mid Jan 2005. I look forward to your response! Kind Regards Jacobus van Niekerk Creative Consultant web: http://www.catics.com/ | http://www.freelancecontractors.com tel: + 27 21 982 7805 This e-mail message is confidential and intended solely for the person to whom or the entity to which it is addressed. All the contents and any attachments remain the property of Catics Ltd unless so stated. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from reading, copying, using or disclosing this message to others. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this e-mail or by telephoning +27 21 9827805 and thereafter delete the message. Catics Ltd does not accept liability for any personal views expressed in this message. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.5.4 - Release Date: 2004/12/15 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
[WSG] Online HTML text editor
Hi all, Just though I should share this nice open source HTML text editor that produces valid XHTML. http://www.fckeditor.net/ Enjoy! Kind Regards Jacobus van Niekerk Creative Consultant web: http://www.catics.com/ | http://www.freelancecontractors.com tel: + 27 21 982 7805 This e-mail message is confidential and intended solely for the person to whom or the entity to which it is addressed. All the contents and any attachments remain the property of Catics Ltd unless so stated. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from reading, copying, using or disclosing this message to others. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this e-mail or by telephoning +27 21 9827805 and thereafter delete the message. Catics Ltd does not accept liability for any personal views expressed in this message. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.775 / Virus Database: 522 - Release Date: 2004/10/08 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
[WSG] Site review plz.
Dear all, I would like to have your comments, as regards to improvements for: http://www.freelancecontractors.com If you encounter any errors/problems please give a short description of the error, the OS and browser details. Kind Regards Jacobus van Niekerk Creative Consultant web: http://www.catics.com/ | http://www.freelancecontractors.com tel: + 27 21 982 7805 This e-mail message is confidential and intended solely for the person to whom or the entity to which it is addressed. All the contents and any attachments remain the property of Catics Ltd unless so stated. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from reading, copying, using or disclosing this message to others. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this e-mail or by telephoning +27 21 9827805 and thereafter delete the message. Catics Ltd does not accept liability for any personal views expressed in this message. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.772 / Virus Database: 519 - Release Date: 2004/10/01 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **