Re: [Zope-dev] ZTK futures: one big package?
The implementation details are over my head, but what SchoolTool needs is a middle ground between one big package and a giant pile of little ones, because our primary deployment strategy is via Linux distribution packaging, in Debian/Ubuntu in particular. Currently, Fabio maintains an official monolithic package for Debian, and we generate a giant pile of .debs from eggs and keep them in a PPA. Because there is administrative overhead with every package, even if we can eventually come to consensus on the desirability or pushing 70 tiny packages into the Debian pipeline, it may never be practical. So a single, community-recognized ZTF that would be the foundation of manageable packaging for Linux distros would be a huge win for us. --Tom ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 3.4.0 candidate 1 Released
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll take a risk by stating the obvious.
If there will continue to be a release schedule for Zope 3, the appserver
It
would reduce confusion to new users greatly to give the appserver release a
name
other than Zope.
Eg.
Current name Proposed name
-
Zope2- Zope
Zope3, the libraries - Zope libraries
Zope3 the appserver - Frobnozz
Isn't this release sort of the last of its kind, though? Kind of a
weird time for a name change
Or if not, it would seem like there would be a better argument for the
new approach having a new name than the old one.
--Tom
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 3.4.0 candidate 1 Released
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've heard that rumored, but there's nothing indicating that in the release announcement. There are forward looking statements in there: tarballs... for the last 3.4 series and probably for 3.5 as well. I take this to mean that there's an intention to have a 3.5, 3.6, 3.7 release, etc, but past 3.5, the release won't be packaged as a tarball. If this is the case, even if it's just for 3.5, it would sure help reduce confusion to give this release of packages (even if it's just a buildout and the KGS for that release) a name other than Zope. Or if not, it would seem like there would be a better argument for the new approach having a new name than the old one. I'm not sure which is the new approach and which is the old one? Well, given that this is a very, very late, long planned release always called Zope 3.4, I'd like to see it come out ASAP without further delay for semantic and philosophical argument. Then we can figure out what to call the next one. --Tom ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Zope 3.4 final?
Hi All, This is a manually-generated reminder that it would be very, very helpful to the SchoolTool project if there would be a Zope 3.4 final release in the next month. 3.4.0b2 is designated as stable on zope.org, and while it may only be a semantic distinction to remove the b2, it will allow us to move zope3 packages into Debian and Ubuntu, and in turn move a whole stack of other Zope3 related packages, and SchoolTool, into those distributions. Thanks for your consideration, Tom Hoffman ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
