Mark St.Godard wrote:
> Ben can chime in as well if he would like to add to this..
Hi everyone
As this is an important question, I've posted a blog on the subject:
http://blog.interface21.com/main/2007/01/24/why-the-name-acegi/
Cheers
Ben
--
I asked the same question to Rod @ TSE, as well talked with Ben
and there is no immediate intention to change the source code
packaging, rather its an explicit rebranding to reflect that it is a
part of the Spring portfolio.
Also this keys into the "release train" concept discussed at TSE...
Karl Moore napisał(a):
> Raised the question here also
> http://forum.springframework.org/showthread.php?t=33908
"What about package names?", especially that it was changed not so long
time ago to org.acegisecurity.*. Touching pakage names again can be a
notion of instability for some. And w
Rod recently spoke about rebranding Acegi early this year. Does anyone have
more information about the impact of this?
Raised the question here also
http://forum.springframework.org/showthread.php?t=33908
Thanks,
Karl
_
Be on
