Yes, if you have a huge
amount of space and time resources available, you can start your system with a
blank slate -- nothing but a very simple learning algorithm, and let it learn
how to learn, learn how to structure its memory, etc. etc.
etc.
This is pretty much what
OOPS does, and what
***
Well, in
Novamente we are not coding *specific knowledge* that is
learnable... but we are coding implicit knowledge as to what sorts of learning
processes are most useful in which specialized subdomains...
---
I don't know, from where
I sit this distinction is artificial. Lear
Well, in Novamente we are not coding *specific
knowledge* that is learnable... but we are coding implicit knowledge
as to what sorts of learning processes are most useful in which specialized
subdomains...
***
I don't know, from where I sit this distinction is
artificial. Learning is general
>>
Well, in Novamente we are not coding *specific knowledge* that is learnable... but we are coding implicit knowledge as to what sorts of learning processes are most useful in which specialized subdomains...
<<
I'm reminded of an AI pioneer who once commented on this same situation - he closed h
hi,
***
It seems to me that conceptual
difference between vision & language is in the level of generalization,
aside from different sensor/actuator orientation. Social Interaction? Once you start coding things that
are learnable, where do you stop before ending up with just another exper
Thanks for your comments!
I like
to distinguish between *functional specialization* and *integrated
cognition*
Novamente (my own AI system) has a mix of
cognitive algorithms, which work together to provide overall cognitive
functionality. The exact mixture of algorithms is determined by
Hi,
You make a lot
of different points... I'll just grab one for the moment
***
I don't believe in combining different methods
because cognition deals with the unknown, - we can't a priori split it into
different areas, except to the extent that they're sensor/hardware specific,
