https://github.com/balazske created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108993
None
From c13a4d7ed344209359ddb838b2688805ceb06304 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 17:33:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][analyzer] FixedAddressChecke
https://github.com/balazske created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108586
The checker was indicated as a 'C' language checker but is only applicable to
'ObjC' code.
From 620a17fca9e6c011099e223cb965cd4bcc8f413a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date
balazske wrote:
> I'm not satisfied with the quality of the reports. The report refers to
> `Subtraction of two pointers that do not point into the same array is
> undefined behavior` without pointing out where the two pointers point to
> (and/or where are they declared, or set to point to dif
https://github.com/balazske created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107596
Checker was tested on 16 projects. The only results were the offset
calculations that were considered as valid (faulty) cases already.
https://codechecker-demo.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com/Default/reports?run=vim_
https://github.com/balazske closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101836
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/balazske closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102636
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/balazske closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102432
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/balazske updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102636
From 11e871ab17c119c71b8ef4bbcd3b186ec0e9a14f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 17:41:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][analyzer] Bring checker
alpha.
https://github.com/balazske updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102636
From 11e871ab17c119c71b8ef4bbcd3b186ec0e9a14f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 17:41:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][analyzer] Bring checker alpha.secur
balazske wrote:
I have tested it on some of the projects but there are not results from this
checker. The detected type of bug looks unlikely so it is difficult to test the
checker this way.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102636
___
cfe-co
@@ -5968,11 +5962,21 @@
ASTNodeImporter::VisitTemplateTypeParmDecl(TemplateTypeParmDecl *D) {
}
if (D->hasDefaultArgument()) {
+// Default argument can be "inherited" when it has a reference to the
+// previous declaration (of the default argument) which is stored
https://github.com/balazske updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101836
From 2e98fc222566c5e746ade4ccaba23de3b59e0a5d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 18:10:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][ASTImporter] New fix for defaul
@@ -5968,11 +5962,21 @@
ASTNodeImporter::VisitTemplateTypeParmDecl(TemplateTypeParmDecl *D) {
}
if (D->hasDefaultArgument()) {
+// Default argument can be "inherited" when it has a reference to the
+// previous declaration (of the default argument) which is stored
balazske wrote:
This fix looks good, but I can not tell now why it would not work to import the
type just before construction of the `VarTemplateSpecializationDecl`. I tried
it and all tests passed. Probably I can test this on a set of projects.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105492
balazske wrote:
It is not easy to find an easily compilable (and not too big) project that
contains `mmap` to test the checker. I could test it with libgit2, can try to
find more projects to test.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102636
___
@@ -5968,11 +5962,21 @@
ASTNodeImporter::VisitTemplateTypeParmDecl(TemplateTypeParmDecl *D) {
}
if (D->hasDefaultArgument()) {
+// Default argument can be "inherited" when it has a reference to the
+// previous declaration (of the default argument) which is stored
@@ -5968,11 +5962,21 @@
ASTNodeImporter::VisitTemplateTypeParmDecl(TemplateTypeParmDecl *D) {
}
if (D->hasDefaultArgument()) {
+// Default argument can be "inherited" when it has a reference to the
+// previous declaration (of the default argument) which is stored
@@ -5968,11 +5962,21 @@
ASTNodeImporter::VisitTemplateTypeParmDecl(TemplateTypeParmDecl *D) {
}
if (D->hasDefaultArgument()) {
+// Default argument can be "inherited" when it has a reference to the
+// previous declaration (of the default argument) which is stored
@@ -5968,11 +5962,21 @@
ASTNodeImporter::VisitTemplateTypeParmDecl(TemplateTypeParmDecl *D) {
}
if (D->hasDefaultArgument()) {
+// Default argument can be "inherited" when it has a reference to the
+// previous declaration (of the default argument) which is stored
@@ -5968,11 +5962,21 @@
ASTNodeImporter::VisitTemplateTypeParmDecl(TemplateTypeParmDecl *D) {
}
if (D->hasDefaultArgument()) {
+// Default argument can be "inherited" when it has a reference to the
+// previous declaration (of the default argument) which is stored
https://github.com/balazske updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101836
From 2e98fc222566c5e746ade4ccaba23de3b59e0a5d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 18:10:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][ASTImporter] New fix for defaul
https://github.com/balazske closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102580
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/balazske updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102580
From 08367f06167d8b12ee4de06a37915decd1e754e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 09:31:55 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][analyzer] Remove array bounds c
https://github.com/balazske created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102636
None
From 11e871ab17c119c71b8ef4bbcd3b186ec0e9a14f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 17:41:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][analyzer] Bring checker alpha
https://github.com/balazske updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102580
From 08367f06167d8b12ee4de06a37915decd1e754e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 09:31:55 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][analyzer] Remove array bounds c
balazske wrote:
The `ArrayBoundV2` checker needs some update to find all cases. For example
`(&x - 1) - &x` is not found, because the checker does only check
`ArraySubscriptExpr` (and others), not a `BinaryOperator` with pointer and
integer.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102580
__
balazske wrote:
I uploaded now #102580 that removes the entire array bounds checking.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102432
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/balazske created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102580
At pointer subtraction only pointers are allowed that point into an array (or
one after the end), this fact was checker by the checker. This check is now
removed because it is a special case of array indexing
balazske wrote:
If the `ArrayBoundsV2` checker is finished it should find all of the cases in
the test of `PointerSubChecker` that have out-of-bound indexing, and including
the cases where a single variable is handled like an 1-element array? If yes
the bounds check is not needed in this check
https://github.com/balazske created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102432
Notes appear at out-of-range array index for index value and array size.
From b9753a79654b1428f753a2fad865eacdf0250ac5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 0
@@ -9919,6 +9919,103 @@ TEST_P(ImportTemplateParmDeclDefaultValue,
ImportExistingVarTemplate) {
testImport(FromLastD);
}
+TEST_P(ImportTemplateParmDeclDefaultValue,
+ ImportParentTemplateDuringNonTypeTemplateParmDecl) {
+ // This wants to provoke that during import o
https://github.com/balazske created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101836
Commit e4440b8 added a change that introduced new crash in an incorrectly
handled case. This is fixed here.
From 2e98fc222566c5e746ade4ccaba23de3b59e0a5d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20
https://github.com/balazske approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101517
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/balazske approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101031
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
balazske wrote:
My concern was only that the return type check check can be too much overhead
now if done for all C++11 lambdas but probably this type of lambda can not be
recognized in other way (maybe from source locations?). But it is only the
C++11 (not newer) case and it is more safe to c
https://github.com/balazske closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96501
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
balazske wrote:
> Here can `ToProcess.append(CurrentS->child_begin(), CurrentS->child_end());`
> add any nullptr into `ToProcess` in this testing context?
I think it is possible, but I could not reproduce this case with the shown
code.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101031
___
balazske wrote:
This looks like a good fix if there is no other way to detect the "C++11 lambda
without parentheses" case.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101031
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/
https://github.com/balazske approved this pull request.
This looks good now, documentation could be a bit more exact in that operations
on standard streams are not checked by the checker, like any other operation on
streams that are not opened on the analysis path.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm
https://github.com/balazske updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100100
From e4440b82f3d1fe5c7cafbad87da0e266d35a619e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 11:20:22 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][ASTImporter] Fix import of tem
balazske wrote:
> Exactly. I didn't want to rush too much, but I can share that my current idea
> is to call `assumeNoAliasingWithStdStreams` only on the success path.
This can be a better (and more simple) solution.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100901
balazske wrote:
In the state dump I see that `stdout` seems to be NULL (last line in
"constraints"). This explains why the `StateNull` becomes NULL, because call to
`assumeNoAliasingWithStdStreams` was called already. I think the better
solution is to check NULL-ness of the std stream variable
https://github.com/balazske approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100903
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/balazske closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97078
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/balazske updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96501
From b431151f83fa2980e4a132191ccf5713ab69806b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 16:48:54 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][analyzer] Improve PointerSubChe
@@ -1,13 +1,14 @@
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -triple i686-unknown-linux
-analyzer-checker=alpha.security.MmapWriteExec -analyzer-config
alpha.security.MmapWriteExec:MmapProtExec=1 -analyzer-config
alpha.security.MmapWriteExec:MmapProtRead=4
-DUSE_ALTERNATIVE_PROT_EXEC_DEFINIT
https://github.com/balazske updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97078
From 1f04ce794a3aefc0f5622a9dea0a92a1e2b50be9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:27:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][analyzer] MmapWriteExecChecker
balazske wrote:
I removed the options to specify `PROT_` values. These should not be needed
because detection from macro value should work in normal cases (probably this
functionality was not available when the options were added).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97078
__
balazske wrote:
Documentation of the checker could be updated with this new behavior.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100085
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/balazske updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97078
From 1f04ce794a3aefc0f5622a9dea0a92a1e2b50be9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:27:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][analyzer] MmapWriteExecChecker
https://github.com/balazske created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100100
Default values of template parameters (non-type, type, template) were not
correctly handled in the "inherited" case. This occurs if the first declaration
contains the default value but a next one not. The defa
@@ -21,30 +21,55 @@
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallDescription.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallEvent.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CheckerContext.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/Checker
https://github.com/balazske edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99281
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/balazske created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99281
After the last change in PR #87144 regressions appeared in some cases. The
problem was that if multiple anonymous enums are present in a class and are
imported as new the import of the second enum can fail beca
https://github.com/balazske created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97078
Read the 'mmap' flags from macro values and use a better test for the error
situation.
From 1f04ce794a3aefc0f5622a9dea0a92a1e2b50be9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Tue
balazske wrote:
Even protobuf contains this type of code:
https://codechecker-demo.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com/Default/report-detail?run=protobuf_v3.13.0_pointersub1&is-unique=on&diff-type=New&checker-name=alpha.core.PointerSub&report-id=5545776&report-hash=1bcd310fbaeccbcc13645b9b277239a2&report-f
balazske wrote:
If the array bounds checker does the same job then the array bounds check it is
not needed in this checker. Specially if it makes no difference if the indexing
is used at pointer subtraction.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96501
__
https://github.com/balazske closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96295
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
balazske wrote:
I fixed a test that contained the entire option help description. I think this
is not needed, removed it and only included the first line of the description.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96295
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/balazske updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96295
From 0c57ad1ca36a841dff700eb98f878475e0243b88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 12:13:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][analyzer] Improve documentation
balazske wrote:
The warning message may be still misleading if the LHS or RHS "arrays" are
non-array variables. Is it better to improve the messages in this case (or
detect if `offsetof` can be used and include it in the message)?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96501
___
balazske wrote:
These results look correct according to the checker, but I am not sure if such
results are useful or really invalid:
https://codechecker-demo.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com/Default/reports?run=vim_v8.2.1920_pointersub1&is-unique=on&diff-type=New&checker-name=alpha.core.PointerSub
In t
https://github.com/balazske created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96501
The checker could report false positives if pointer arithmetic was done on
pointers to non-array data before pointer subtraction. Another problem is fixed
that could cause false positive if members of the same
https://github.com/balazske closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95899
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/balazske updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96295
From 0c57ad1ca36a841dff700eb98f878475e0243b88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 12:13:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][analyzer] Improve documentation
https://github.com/balazske closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89887
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
balazske wrote:
I have not enough resources to create a reproducer and it is not trivial, so I
would merge this change now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89887
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/
https://github.com/balazske created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96295
None
From 0c57ad1ca36a841dff700eb98f878475e0243b88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 12:13:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][analyzer] Improve documentati
https://github.com/balazske closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95003
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/balazske approved this pull request.
At least the `StreamChecker` part looks correct, Probably we can test on the
opensource projects if there appear too many bad results (but probably not many
resource leak cases are found).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94957
_
balazske wrote:
> > I did not find a similar test for `MallocChecker` but there could be one
> > with similar test functions.
>
> I'm not sure what tests you are referring to. I did fix your other
> observations.
I meant another test file where the `NoStateChangeFuncVisitor` is tested (if
the
https://github.com/balazske updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95899
From 1eb6e7ebde0e97e1cd077dc27ffd3ebd6ed0e93d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:09:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang][analyzer] Add notes to PointerS
@@ -144,9 +144,24 @@ void PointerSubChecker::checkPreStmt(const BinaryOperator
*B,
// Allow arithmetic on different symbolic regions.
if (isa(SuperLR) || isa(SuperRR))
return;
+if (const auto *SuperDLR = dyn_cast(SuperLR))
+ DiffDeclL = SuperDLR->getDecl
https://github.com/balazske updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95899
From 1eb6e7ebde0e97e1cd077dc27ffd3ebd6ed0e93d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:09:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][analyzer] Add notes to PointerS
https://github.com/balazske updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95899
From 1eb6e7ebde0e97e1cd077dc27ffd3ebd6ed0e93d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:09:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][analyzer] Add notes to PointerS
balazske wrote:
I found difficult results from the checker where it is not obvious what the
problem is.
One type is this case where a negative index is found (any of these results, or
check the first one):
https://codechecker-demo.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com/Default/reports?run=curl_curl-7_66_0_p
https://github.com/balazske created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95899
Notes are added to indicate the array declarations of the arrays in a found
invalid pointer subtraction.
From 1eb6e7ebde0e97e1cd077dc27ffd3ebd6ed0e93d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3
balazske wrote:
I did not get crash with this script and latest clang. Probably there is a
difference in the used system headers (`iostream` and `string` is included)?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87144
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-co
@@ -393,6 +401,173 @@ ProgramStateRef
CStringChecker::checkNonNull(CheckerContext &C,
return stateNonNull;
}
+static std::optional getIndex(ProgramStateRef State,
+ const ElementRegion *ER, CharKind CK) {
+ SValBuilder &SValBuilder = St
balazske wrote:
It should be possible in `StreamChecker` to perform the invalidations even if
the `StreamState` is not found (stream was not opened). Another possible
solution is that a generic invalidation support is added to
`StdLibraryFunctionsChecker` that can be used for stream related an
https://github.com/balazske approved this pull request.
It looks now OK at least to my knowledge.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93408
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cf
@@ -696,6 +732,69 @@ struct StreamOperationEvaluator {
} // end anonymous namespace
+//===--===//
+// Definition of NoStreamStateChangeVisitor.
+//===--
@@ -696,6 +730,69 @@ struct StreamOperationEvaluator {
} // end anonymous namespace
+//===--===//
+// Definition of NoStreamStateChangeVisitor.
+//===--
https://github.com/balazske edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94957
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/balazske commented:
I did not find big issues. But a description could be added to the
`NoOwnershipChangeVisitor` to explain what it does, and to `StreamChecker` for
what is it used. I did not find a similar test for `MallocChecker` but there
could be one with similar test f
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -verify %s -analyzer-output=text \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=core \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=unix.Stream
balazske wrote:
This file can have a better name (like "stream-notes-missing-close.cpp").
https://github
https://github.com/balazske created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95003
The checker was renamed at some time ago but the documentation was not updated.
The section is now just moved and renamed. The documentation is still very
simple and needs improvement.
From 6bcef3384ed986447b1
https://github.com/balazske closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93676
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/balazske updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93676
From a896030e71d09ebe7239d6fab343606918ee4c1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 14:28:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang][analyzer] Improved PointerSubCh
@@ -0,0 +1,443 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -verify %s \
+// RUN: -triple x86_64-linux-gnu \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=core,unix.Stream,alpha.security.taint \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.ExprInspection
+
+#include "Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-simple-stream.h"
@@ -0,0 +1,443 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -verify %s \
+// RUN: -triple x86_64-linux-gnu \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=core,unix.Stream,alpha.security.taint \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.ExprInspection
+
+#include "Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-simple-stream.h"
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+//===--*- C++
-*--//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
https://github.com/balazske edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93408
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,443 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -verify %s \
+// RUN: -triple x86_64-linux-gnu \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=core,unix.Stream,alpha.security.taint \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.ExprInspection
+
+#include "Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-simple-stream.h"
@@ -0,0 +1,443 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -verify %s \
+// RUN: -triple x86_64-linux-gnu \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=core,unix.Stream,alpha.security.taint \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.ExprInspection
+
+#include "Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-simple-stream.h"
@@ -0,0 +1,443 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -verify %s \
+// RUN: -triple x86_64-linux-gnu \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=core,unix.Stream,alpha.security.taint \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.ExprInspection
+
+#include "Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-simple-stream.h"
https://github.com/balazske updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93676
From a896030e71d09ebe7239d6fab343606918ee4c1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 14:28:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang][analyzer] Improved PointerSubCh
@@ -0,0 +1,412 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -verify %s \
+// RUN: -triple x86_64-linux-gnu \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=core,unix.Stream,alpha.security.taint \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.ExprInspection
+
+#include "Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-simple-stream.h"
@@ -0,0 +1,412 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -verify %s \
+// RUN: -triple x86_64-linux-gnu \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=core,unix.Stream,alpha.security.taint \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.ExprInspection
+
+#include "Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-simple-stream.h"
@@ -0,0 +1,412 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -verify %s \
+// RUN: -triple x86_64-linux-gnu \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=core,unix.Stream,alpha.security.taint \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.ExprInspection
+
+#include "Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-simple-stream.h"
1 - 100 of 711 matches
Mail list logo
