Hi Jensen,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 07:08:13PM -0400, Jensen Zhang wrote:
> Hi Sebastian, Ingmar, Danny, all,
>
> First, thanks for all your discussions. I also have several comments.
> Please see inline.
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 2:39 PM Sebastian Kiesel wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ingmar, all,
> >
> >
time to study this possibility, but I hope people also to
notice this direction.
BRs,
Chunshan Xiong
-Original Message-
From: alto On Behalf Of Jensen Zhang
Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2020 7:08 AM
To: Sebastian Kiesel
Cc: Ingmar Poese ; IETF ALTO
Subject: Re: [alto] ALTO at IETF-108: F
Hi Sebastian, Ingmar, Danny, all,
First, thanks for all your discussions. I also have several comments.
Please see inline.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 2:39 PM Sebastian Kiesel wrote:
>
> Hi Ingmar, all,
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 01:33:37PM +0200, Ingmar Poese wrote:
> > Am 14.07.20 um 11:56 schrie
Hi Ingmar, all,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 01:33:37PM +0200, Ingmar Poese wrote:
> Am 14.07.20 um 11:56 schrieb Sebastian Kiesel:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 08:18:04AM -0300, Danny Alex Lachos Perez wrote:
> > > > Even the very first ALTO use case was multi-domain in some sense:
> > > > the bittorre
Hi Jan, Vijay, Martin,
Thanks a lot for the guidance. It is extremely helpful.
Please see below.
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 10:55 AM Jan Seedorf wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Martin (our new AD), Vijay and myself had some discussions on how to
> generally move forward with the WG and how to plan the IET
Dear all,
Martin (our new AD), Vijay and myself had some discussions on how to
generally move forward with the WG and how to plan the IETF-108 ALTO
session accordingly. We believe we should finalize the remaining
milestones (see https://tools.ietf.org/wg/alto/charters) by or at the
latest dur
