Hi Klaas and Qin,
Thanks for the review and suggestions. See my comments inline.
Thanks,
Jensen
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 12:59 AM Klaas Wierenga wrote:
> Hi Qin,
>
> > On 24 Nov 2021, at 14:07, Qin Wu wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Klaas:
> > -邮件原件-
> > 发件人: Klaas Wierenga via Datatracker [mailt
Hi Qin,
> On 24 Nov 2021, at 14:07, Qin Wu wrote:
>
> Hi, Klaas:
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Klaas Wierenga via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
> 发送时间: 2021年11月24日 17:24
> 收件人: sec...@ietf.org
> 抄送: alto@ietf.org; draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto@ietf.org;
> last-c...@ietf.org
Hi, Klaas:
-邮件原件-
发件人: Klaas Wierenga via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
发送时间: 2021年11月24日 17:24
收件人: sec...@ietf.org
抄送: alto@ietf.org; draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto@ietf.org;
last-c...@ietf.org
主题: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-al
Reviewer: Klaas Wierenga
Review result: Has Issues
Hi,
I found 1 nit and one more substantial issue
- the abstract says:
OLD
RFC 8008 defines precisely the semantics of FCI and provides guidelines on the
FCI protocol, but the exact protocol is specified.
I think it should read
NEW
RFC 8008 de
