[il-antlr-interest: 28825] [antlr-interest] throws on rule declaration being ignored

'throws' id ( ',' id )* -> ^('throws' id+) ; I know I can make it a runtime exception, but I'd like to use my exception hierarchy. Am I doing something wrong or should that syntax work? Thanks. -- Kaleb Pederson Blog - http://kalebpederson.com Twitter - http://twi

[il-antlr-interest: 28824] [antlr-interest] gunit syntax for tree walker with a flat list of nodes

; java.lang.NullPointerException at org.antlr.gunit.OutputTest.getExpected(OutputTest.java:65) at org.antlr.gunit.gUnitExecutor.executeTests(gUnitExecutor.java:245) ... What is the correct way to match a flat tree? Thanks. -- Kaleb Pederson Blog - http://kalebpederson.com Twitter - http://twitter

[il-antlr-interest: 28785] [antlr-interest] GUnit testsuite Run / Debug Configuration for Eclipse

DE Eclipse plugin (thanks Edgar!), but to my knowledge it doesn't add any options in this area. Thanks for any suggestions. -- Kaleb Pederson Blog - http://kalebpederson.com Twitter - http://twitter.com/kalebpederson List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Uns

[il-antlr-interest: 28569] Re: [antlr-interest] Another JUnit testing framework

Alan, Overall your code looks very clean. Do you have any samples that demonstrate usage? (I looked around but your README and docs directories are basically empty :). Thanks. -- Kaleb Pederson Blog - http://kalebpederson.com Twitter - http://twitter.com/kalebpederson On Thursday 22 April

[il-antlr-interest: 28359] [antlr-interest] TreeRewrite bug or misuse?

CH_ARG $lhs+)) ; The above yields the following tree: (AST_MATCH (AST_MATCH_ARG "five") (AST_MATCH_ARG "six")) But I expected the following: (AST_MATCH (AST_MATCH_ARG "one" "three" "five") (AST_MATCH_ARG "two" "four&quo

[il-antlr-interest: 28327] Re: [antlr-interest] sematic analysis ?

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Kaleb Pederson wrote: > Venkat, > > One way to do what you've mentioned is to create a tree walker which > walks the AST.  Then, within the AST, you'll need to do a couple of > things. > > First, you need to populate a symbol

[il-antlr-interest: 28325] Re: [antlr-interest] sematic analysis ?

ype checking happens in a single pass of a tree walker, so it's nicely componentized. I hope that helps. -- Kaleb Pederson http://kalebpederson.com http://twitter.com/kalebpederson On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:46 AM, venkat medhaj wrote: > Hi, > > I am kinda new to antlr and I wonder

[il-antlr-interest: 28290] Re: [antlr-interest] Using the results

cifics it would be helpful if you could provide more concrete details. HTH. -- Kaleb Pederson Blog - http://kalebpederson.com Twitter - http://twitter.com/kalebpederson List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your

[il-antlr-interest: 27636] Re: [antlr-interest] gunit problem

e for it somewhere and was able to debug another problem, so hopefully you can do the same. -- Kaleb Pederson Blog - http://kalebpederson.com Twitter - http://twitter.com/kalebpederson List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/an

[il-antlr-interest: 27434] Re: [antlr-interest] Issue with antlrworks 1.3.1 and JDK 1.6 update 17?

en writing the application using Java. > Any advice for debugging this further? I also tried removing the AW preferences and disabling focus-stealing prevention in my window manager, but neither of those helped either. Looks like a couple of real bugs to me. -- Kaleb Pederson Blog - http://kale

[il-antlr-interest: 27390] [antlr-interest] Consequence of Bug ANTLR-413 in GUnit

being thrown in GUnit's tree walking tests. Since the fix is: -it = new TreeIterator(root); +it = new TreeIterator(adaptor, root); in CommonTreeNodeStream.java... I hope it can be fixed for the next release :). Thanks. -- Kaleb Pederson Blog - http://kalebpederson.com Twitter

[il-antlr-interest: 26838] Re: [antlr-interest] Equivalent of TOKEN{x,y}

eve you're right, that will make things messy and more intertwined than need be. Thanks. -- Kaleb Pederson Blog - http://kalebpederson.com Twitter - http://twitter.com/kalebpederson List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/optio

[il-antlr-interest: 26835] Re: [antlr-interest] Referencing Template(s) in a grammar.

available. I was going to say that you need to use scopes to make that available later in your code, but it looks like you're already using scopes. Can you elaborate a bit on what I may have missed that makes scopes insufficient for your needs? Thanks. -- Kaleb Pederson Blog - http