On 30/06/2015 jan i wrote:
It is a matter of interpretation not hate :-)
Official deadline is in just about 11 hours, but we are open minded so
talks coming within the next 35 hours will be considered.
Thanks, submitted and hopefully others have taken advantage of this
flexibility too.
On 29/06/2015 Rich Bowen wrote:
On 06/29/2015 11:04 AM, jan i wrote:
Thanks, just wondering why do so many presentations come during the
last 48 hours.just to make the apacheCON team
nervous ?
Tradition.
...and to fully obey the tradition and deserve some hate from Jan and
the
On 30 June 2015 at 13:00, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 29/06/2015 Rich Bowen wrote:
On 06/29/2015 11:04 AM, jan i wrote:
Thanks, just wondering why do so many presentations come during the
last 48 hours.just to make the apacheCON team
nervous ?
Tradition.
...and
Maybe it has to do with how the event is marketed each time? We (and the
LF) should have some statistics (graphs? Trend lines?) on past
registrations. Or don't we measure such? For sure, when a kind of
'pressure' is marketed, the interested parties seem to register their talk.
But it might also be
On 29 June 2015 at 17:37, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
On 06/29/2015 11:28 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Maybe it has to do with how the event is marketed each time? We (and the
LF) should have some statistics (graphs? Trend lines?) on past
registrations. Or don't we measure such? For
On 06/29/2015 11:28 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Maybe it has to do with how the event is marketed each time? We (and the
LF) should have some statistics (graphs? Trend lines?) on past
registrations. Or don't we measure such? For sure, when a kind of
'pressure' is marketed, the interested parties
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 5:04 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
...just wondering why do so many presentations come during the last 48
hours.just to make the apacheCON team nervous ?...
Good Ideas Need Time ;-)
-Bertrand
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
On 06/29/2015 11:28 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Maybe it has to do with how the event is marketed each time? We (and the
LF) should have some statistics (graphs? Trend lines?) on past
registrations. Or don't we measure such?
On 6/29/15, 4:15 PM, shaposh...@gmail.com on behalf of Roman Shaposhnik
shaposh...@gmail.com on behalf of ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
Every event, on any topic, of any size, that I have ever been affiliated
with, has had this same situation. No matter what you do, half the
papers
will be
Hello Pierre,
I just have submitted the proposal for Conferencing with Apache
OpenMeetings presentation
I'll double-check it tomorrow and will upload slides
please let me know if anything else need to be done
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Hi all,
As Jan (Iversen) pointed out the deadline for the CFP submission for
Apachecon EU 2015 is approaching rapidly. If you're still interested in
hosting a talk, please submit your talk now (if you haven't already done
so) and inform me soonest.
I will then be able - after the deadline has
Hi,
Thanks for pushing this!
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com wrote:
...The Apache Maturity Model - or a generalisation thereof (Bertrand
Delacrétaz)..
Works for me, the title will be Save your failing project with the
Apache Maturity Model.
...Today I
Hi All, Bertrand,
Would the following not be a better (catchier) title for your talk:
The Apache Mature Model - save your project from failing
As for the track title I believe, that your suggestion is pushing it
towards a narrowing direction. Now it encompasses Community and Code. We
must not
On 12 June 2015 at 11:12, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All, Jan,
Hello ASFVisionApacheConCoreDiscussion, here are the politely constructed
reactions of this contributor...
(removing cc parties as it moves into the general discussion area).
First of all:
I am convinced
Hi.
May I politely intervene here.
Pierre@ I think it is super that you volunteer to make an extra track, but
we do need to coordinate things.
Your track is very close to the community track and do you really see 6
talks on this theme ?
community over code is not a good track name, since it
On 12 June 2015 at 11:41, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:45 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
...Would you consider making 2 tracks
- a overview of the maturity model, why it is needed and e.g. other ways
of
measuring
- an in depth, with a
16 matches
Mail list logo
