[arch-general] Gnome-shell Compositing for full screen applications

2014-03-26 Thread Mark Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Salutations, I was recently running a test of the i3 windows manager and tried dolphin-emu. To my surprise I was able to play Wii games at full speed at 1080p resolution on my i3-2105 (Intel HD 3000) rig. I'm assuming this is due no compositing in i

Re: [arch-general] Configuring enabled services

2014-03-26 Thread Sean Greenslade
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:13:08AM +0200, Gesh wrote: > On March 19, 2014 9:16:57 PM GMT+02:00, Ary Kleinerman > wrote: > >> There's not really much magic going on. Are you aware of: > >> > >> /etc/systemd/system > >> > >> This contains symlinks that do already pretty much what you describe, > >a

Re: [arch-general] Configuring enabled services

2014-03-26 Thread Emil Lundberg
That is correct, when you call `systemctl enable foo.unit` then the [Install] section of the unit file is "executed". "Static" means that the unit has no [Install] section, meaning it is permanently enabled/disabled as far as the systemctl enable/disable tool is concerned. Other than pulling themse

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Trimming down our default kernel configuration

2014-03-26 Thread Daniel Micay
On 26/03/14 02:56 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Hello all, > > it won't be too long until 3.14 is out and I want to address a topic > that has been bugging me for a while. Our kernel includes everything and > the kitchensink. I have no problem with delivering drivers that can be > built modular, but

Re: [arch-general] Configuring enabled services

2014-03-26 Thread Gesh
On March 19, 2014 9:16:57 PM GMT+02:00, Ary Kleinerman wrote: >> There's not really much magic going on. Are you aware of: >> >> /etc/systemd/system >> >> This contains symlinks that do already pretty much what you describe, >and this >> is systemd's native configuration. >> >Paul, >Don't forget

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Trimming down our default kernel configuration

2014-03-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 26.03.2014 21:31, schrieb Leonid Isaev: > On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 21:00:15 +0100 > Thomas Bächler wrote: > >> Am 26.03.2014 20:18, schrieb Leonid Isaev: >>> However, I don't think that Yama requires any userspace components, does >>> it? Currently, I boot with "security=yama" and completely disabl

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Trimming down our default kernel configuration

2014-03-26 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 21:00:15 +0100 Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 26.03.2014 20:18, schrieb Leonid Isaev: > > However, I don't think that Yama requires any userspace components, does > > it? Currently, I boot with "security=yama" and completely disabled > > non-admin ptrace (kernel.yama.ptrace_scope=

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Trimming down our default kernel configuration

2014-03-26 Thread Mauro Santos
On 26-03-2014 19:18, Leonid Isaev wrote: >> 1) Once we agreed to disable one LSM, everyone else said "we can enable >> LSM XYZ, too". And so we did. Right now, we enable SELinux, SMACK, >> Tomoyo, AppArmor and Yama, although we don't support the userspace for >> any of those. >> >> I propose to dro

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Trimming down our default kernel configuration

2014-03-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 26.03.2014 20:18, schrieb Leonid Isaev: > However, I don't think that Yama requires any userspace components, does it? > Currently, I boot with "security=yama" and completely disabled non-admin > ptrace (kernel.yama.ptrace_scope=2). Perhaps -ARCH kernels should keep Yama > available albeit disab

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Trimming down our default kernel configuration

2014-03-26 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:56:26 +0100 Thomas Bächler wrote: > Hello all, > > it won't be too long until 3.14 is out and I want to address a topic > that has been bugging me for a while. Our kernel includes everything and > the kitchensink. I have no problem with delivering drivers that can be > bui

[arch-general] Trimming down our default kernel configuration

2014-03-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Hello all, it won't be too long until 3.14 is out and I want to address a topic that has been bugging me for a while. Our kernel includes everything and the kitchensink. I have no problem with delivering drivers that can be built modular, but there are other things that have an unknown impact on e

Re: [arch-general] What's with F# and mono?

2014-03-26 Thread Squall Lionheart
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Magnus Therning wrote: > I'm just starting to dip my toes in the mono waters. Slightly > prompted by my current situation at work. In particular I'm > interested in F#, but I'm finding the whole situation around > mono/monodevelop + F# a bit confusing. > > 1. The

Re: [arch-general] GNOME Software: Status and integrable?

2014-03-26 Thread Ike Devolder
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 01:43:57AM +0100, Armin K. wrote: > On 03/26/2014 01:26 AM, Karol Babioch wrote: > > Hi, > > > > now that GNOME 3.12 has been released and probably will hit the repos in > > the next couple of days/weeks, I'm wondering what the current status of > > "Software" is [1]? This