On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 08:05:18PM -0800, Adam Levy via arch-general
wrote:
> Forgive me if this is not the proper channel. I could have messaged
> the maintainer Andreas Radke directly but wasn't sure of the
> appropriate convention for such a question.
It's generally best to create a bug repor
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 06:41:54PM +0100, Jayesh Badwaik via arch-general
wrote:
> Test Message
If you just want to test if your DMARC verifier works, there are a few
possibilities listed here[1] under the "Message Validation" heading.
These are probably more helpful that what you get from using
On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 05:36:08AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf via arch-general
wrote:
> mails to mail...@lists.archlinux.org [1] are rejected.
Thanks for the notification. It should work again now.
Florian
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 05:43:28PM +0100, Jayesh Badwaik via arch-general
wrote:
> I am looking at possibilities to have a setup which does not need to be
> restarted at all and can be live patched. I have seen this old post:
I think that if your system is important enough that it shall never g
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 06:56:36PM +0200, scootergrisen via arch-general
wrote:
> How do i delete my user/account from https://bugs.archlinux.org/ ?
This has been handled on IRC in the meantime.
Florian
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 03:31:15PM +0100, Jonathon Fernyhough
wrote:
> While I've had my own run-ins while getting to grips with "the Arch
> approach" (for want of a better phrase), I'd never resort to making
> personal attacks, via a mailing list or otherwise.
>
> Taking your own advice, wouldn
It's now part of pacman-contrib. You can find stuff like that by using
pkgfile.
Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 10.02.2018 16:46, thepouar--- via arch-general wrote:
> Had this problem for a few days, first noticed when I tried searching for a
> package. my ip address is 172.7.224.99.
Your IP is not being blocked by us. Could you tell me which URL you are
trying to reach? Also please run `getent ahosts $
On 27.11.2017 01:32, Tegan Burns wrote:
> I was trying to register an account on aur.archlinux.org but I never
> received a confirmation email.
Replied off-list.
Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 19.11.2017 16:24, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> We cannot migrate to git because no one has put in the work necessary to
> properly rewrite dbscripts.
Just to clarify: Gabriel Souza Franco (gbsf) has put quite a lot of work
into this and some others have also worked on parts, but we haven't yet
assemb
On 08.11.2017 09:47, Simon Doppler wrote:
> When I tried to delete the directory (with rm -rf) but I could only delete
> all
> the files it contained. It did not work either after a reboot.
If you run btrfs, this is a btrfs subvolume which you need to remove
with `btrfs subvolume delete`.
Flori
On 04.09.2017 14:33, James Tobin via arch-general wrote:
> Hello, I'm working with an employer that is looking to hire
This is not a recruitment list. Please take such mails elsewhere.
Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 16.08.2017 21:47, SET wrote:
> Le mercredi 16 août 2017 20:48:59 CEST Bartłomiej Piotrowski a écrit :
>
>> Which mirror was it? We will try to contact them about the issue.
>>
>> B
>
> It is :
> http://archlinux.mirrors.ovh.net/archlinux/$repo/os/$arch
I've notified the mirror admin. I'll p
On 22.05.2017 00:36, Steven Noonan wrote:
> None of the mirrors are listed as "successfully syncing mirrors", or even
> as "out of sync mirrors" for that matter.
Thanks for the notification. The mirrors and the data collection are
fine, it's just an issue with displaying the data. We are looking i
On 30.04.2017 17:30, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>
>
> Sent from BlueMail for iPhone
> On Apr 30, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Alexander Harrigan
> wrote:
>
> I think the problem is lack of information about statuses of various projects.
> Users can't disticnt between something that is being worked on slowly bec
On 28.04.2017 14:40, fnodeuser wrote:
> you continue to place pkgs in the testing repo that do not require any
> further testing.
Thank you for showing that you do not understand our repository policy.
All [core] packages go to [testing] first to ensure that we do not
completely break anyone's s
Hi,
Our web server (apollo.archlinux.org) appears to experience some
hardware issues and will be checked by the ISP shortly. Please expect a
downtime of up to 14 hours.
The following services will be affected: bugs, planet, security, www
(main website)
Other services (wiki, bbs, mailinglists) ar
On 10.04.2017 13:56, SanskritFritz via arch-general wrote:
> Is it possible that my work IP address where I connect from (195.184.167.238)
> gets rejected at archive.archlinux.org?
We do not reject any traffic, but we did migrate the archive to a new
server at the beginning of April. Maybe the pro
On 16.03.2017 18:41, Anast Gramm via arch-general wrote:
> So, what's going on with the mailing list?
Thanks for reporting this problem.
We've forgotten to migrate the service that creates those mails. It will
be resolved soon. Likely either by implementing the sending function
directly into the
On 05.01.2017 13:24, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Actually I shouldn't have replied to your request and instead ban your
> email address.
Good thing you can't ban people from this list. I could, but I'll give
you another chance to not hit reply the next time you'd want to write a
reply like this.
Floria
On 26.12.2016 13:12, NicoHood wrote:
> So we needed to verify the source otherwise. But there was no real
> option as md5/sha1 is broken
I fully agree that using stronger hashes is generally a good idea, but
please stop being ridiculous.
> and his internet is too slow to download it
> again via t
On 14.11.2016 20:44, Sebastian Lau via arch-general wrote:
> nullptr ~ % cinnamon &
> [1]
> cinnamon: error while loading shared libraries: libreadline.so.6: cannot
> open shared object file: No such file or directory
> [1] + exit 127 cinnamon
> nullptr ~ % LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libread
On Friday, September 16, 2016 7:20:46 PM CEST Jordyn Carattini via arch-
general wrote:
> I keep getting http error 502 from the archlinux.polymorf.fr, I've been
> getting this error for the past month. Also sorry if I'm not posting this
> in the right place.
If you still experience the problem, p
On Wednesday, August 24, 2016 6:01:22 PM CEST Nicola Squartini via arch-
general wrote:
> Trying to release electron-1.3.4-1, I issued /community/db-update
> on repos.archlinux.org but I get:
>
> ==> WARNING: Repo [community] (i686) is already locked by sourceballs.
> -> Retrying in 10 seconds.
On Thursday, August 11, 2016 11:28:47 AM CEST Compy wrote:
> I've been looking at that, I was more or less just curious as to whether
> or not people know of prior uses of Arch Linux for embedded projects
> that use x86 motherboards.
I'm running Arch on my router which uses this board[1]. That's i
On 26.07.2016 03:23, Oon-Ee Ng via arch-general wrote:
> 1. What exactly can these users do? I assume simply sign-off as 'works for me'
> 2. Is there any hard deadline?
> 3. (related to above) is there any policy as to what specifically a
> user should have tested before signing off? Starting at le
On 04.07.2016 19:54, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> Still good. :) I have yet to see a single email go to spam since you
> fixed it.
Glad to hear that. Thanks for the feedback!
Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 16.06.2016 03:46, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> On 06/08/2016 03:45 PM, Florian Pritz via arch-general wrote:
>> Now that is something I totally missed when I read their guidelines, but
>> it certainly sounds like it could be the cause of these problems. I have
>&
On 23.06.2016 16:04, Andre "Osku" Schmidt via arch-general wrote:
> I would like to provide the user a single command to build "my" software
> (eg. make), but am not sure what i should do.
If there are pkg-config files or similar to detect the correct settings,
use those. Otherwise, just default t
On 17.06.2016 21:24, pete nikolic via arch-general wrote:
> ldconfig: File /usr/lib/libKF5KMahjongglib.so is empty, not checked.
> ldconfig: File /usr/lib/libKF5KDEGamesPrivate.so is empty, not checked.
> ldconfig: File /usr/lib/libKF5ActivitiesExperimentalStats.so.1 is empty, not
> checked.
> ld
On 15.06.2016 19:37, Francis Gerund via arch-general wrote:
> sudo reflector --verbose --country 'United States' -l 200 -p https --sort
> rate --save /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
>
> The result, only one source (has been 5 or 6 sources before):
We have migrated our repos to a new server and the cronj
On 08.06.2016 17:18, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> In one, I see:
> Authentication-Results: luna.archlinux.org;
> dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key)
> header.d=dray-be.20150623.gappssmtp.com
> header.i=@dray-be.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b=lZvs/tYM
On 08.06.2016 11:18, Maarten de Vries wrote:
> Gmail imposes more strict checks on email coming in over IPv6, with
> the rationale that IPv6 enabled machines are more modern and thus should
> be configured properly for newer verification techniques.
Now that is something I totally missed when I
On 08.06.2016 06:26, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> dkim header remarks indicate either failed or missing dkim sigs for
> those messages.
That's weird. For me the signatures very just fine. Could you show me
the exact error you get (assuming there is one)?
Maybe also run the full mail (so
On 01.06.2016 11:36, Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> We are currently experiencing some technical problems with the webserver
> for archlinux.org, bugs.archlinux.org, patchwork.archlinux.org. We are
> working on it, but resolving this problem could take a while.
The machine is back onli
Hi,
We are currently experiencing some technical problems with the webserver
for archlinux.org, bugs.archlinux.org, patchwork.archlinux.org. We are
working on it, but resolving this problem could take a while.
The mailinglists, AUR, wiki and forums are hosted on a different machine
and are still
On 16.01.2016 05:38, Natu wrote:
> You don't say what yahoo's reject message is, ...
I guess it's possible that some users simply marked mailing list mails
as spam and we got blacklisted because of that. The reject message is this:
421 4.7.1 [TS03] All messages from 5.9.250.164 will be permanentl
37 matches
Mail list logo
