On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Sidath Weerasinghe
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In Andes client, I implemented a new initialContextFactory and inside
> that, I made an AMQP URL.
> Inside the Andes client, I called that web service to get the cluster node
> IP address and Port details. When calling web
Hi all,
In Andes client, I implemented a new initialContextFactory and inside that,
I made an AMQP URL.
Inside the Andes client, I called that web service to get the cluster node
IP address and Port details. When calling web service it shuffles the IP
address and gives String to the client. Using
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Thusitha Thilina Dayaratne <
thusit...@wso2.com> wrote:
> Hi Sagara,
>
> I've added the ninja framework sample[1] to the perf test. We will use
> that too in the next msf4j release perf test.
>
Great !
Thanks !
>
> [1] - https://github.com/wso2/msf4j/pull/281
>
Hi Sagara,
I've added the ninja framework sample[1] to the perf test. We will use that
too in the next msf4j release perf test.
[1] - https://github.com/wso2/msf4j/pull/281
Thanks
Thusitha
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Sagara Gunathunga wrote:
> What about ${Subject} [1]
>
>
> [1] - http
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Chathura Ekanayake
wrote:
> If we are not storing trivial artifacts, it is very difficult to use a
> common UI for store and especially for publisher. If a store framework is
> used, we end up extending it and in many situations it can become more
> complex than d
If we are not storing trivial artifacts, it is very difficult to use a
common UI for store and especially for publisher. If a store framework is
used, we end up extending it and in many situations it can become more
complex than developing a new UI. Therefore, I agree with Nuwan and
SajithAR that w
