While going about recompiling kernel for micro root I noticed a few things that
one can do without at least for kirkwood:
Fusion MPT device support
(this is a hardware RAID SCSI controller ... I doubt anyone will ever
have one connected to an ARM based embedde system even if a working
Sorry for starting a new thread on something that was started elsewhere
but maybe the shoot-off needs better attention with a new thread.
>> This is a mix of a few I built myself and some gotten from current.
>> This is what I'll be working with and should fit in a compressed
>> jffs2 image
Yep that works -- but normally your mail client should do it for you. You
can probably configure it to prefix any reply with "Re:". It'll save wear
and tear on your fingers and keyboard! ;)
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011, Davide wrote:
>
> I was told that reply made a mess by some other user.
>
> I'll fix
Am Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:32:33 +0100 (BST)
schrieb Davide :
>
> I was told that reply made a mess by some other user.
What I've meant was: Don't use the reply button for new threads
and change the subject only because this generates a mess in the thread
view ;-)
> I'll fix it manually just tell m
I was told that reply made a mess by some other user.
I'll fix it manually just tell me what fields I should leave and where.
This is what my client would normaly do as a reply:
"Re: [ARMedslack] Slackware ARM on Small NAS (NS-K330)"
What's good in that and what's bad in that ?
Regards
David
--
Davide -- can you please reply properly to the threads?
I'm not sure what your mail client is doing here, but it's not prefixing
the Subject line with "Re:" for a start, so it looks as if you're starting
a new thread each time.
Can you check the settings on your mail client, or perhaps choose a
d
