Em outubro 21, 2016 10:10 Levente Polyak escreveu:
Well I don't see why it shouldn't be but as long as it's the AUR most likely that won't be enforce anyway as there isn't even proper UID GID registry.
But any package in the repo must not delete user and group accounts, that's what that TODO l
On October 21, 2016 1:38:06 PM GMT+02:00, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general
wrote:
>>
>> I would say: just leave it around. In fact we had a big TODO list [0]
>> cleaning up all the userdel from all packages in the whole repos (not
>> the AUR).
>> It doesn't hurt much and in fact if it ever cr
On 21-10-16 13:15, Bruno Pagani wrote:
Can we have hints about why this happened? Especially, cozy-nginx,
cozy-standalone and cozy-apache all redirect users to cozy package.
Thanks,
Bruno
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2016-October/013898.html
Em outubro 20, 2016 17:36 Levente Polyak escreveu:
Hi Giancarlo,
Well I don't see reason to have a checksum for that one, its contained
within the source (PKGBUILD) and not downloaded from a remote.
It either comes through git or via a pkg-src tarball. The PKGBUILD
itself (that contains that che
Can we have hints about why this happened? Especially, cozy-nginx,
cozy-standalone and cozy-apache all redirect users to cozy package.
Thanks,
Bruno
Message transféré
Sujet : AUR Package deleted: cozy
Date : Fri, 21 Oct 2016 09:23:27 + (UTC)
De :not...@aur.archl
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 7 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 29 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days