Re: ultrix and 'missing'?

2001-05-17 Thread Harlan Stenn
The failure is happening on a SunOS 4.1.3 box with "cc" and GNU make (3.76.1). The build is being done outside of the source tree: % mkdir A.`config.guess` % cd !$ % ../configure % make As I recall, the problem did not happen on a 4.1.3 box with gcc and GNU make 3.74 . I'm trying to instal

Re: pr19.test

2001-05-17 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Robert> I recall it failing on openBSD 2.8. Cool. Now, how can we fix it? One idea would be to emit `.PRECIOUS: parse.c'. However, I don't know if that will work with a non-GNU make. Would that work on OpenBSD? (I don't have access

RE: pr19.test

2001-05-17 Thread Robert Collins
I recall it failing on openBSD 2.8. Rob

Re: ultrix and 'missing'?

2001-05-17 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Harlan" == Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Harlan> Sure, how can I help? Harlan> I bet the first thing is to get CVS automake on that box... I'm afraid so. But if you could just get the cvs automake anywhere, you could set up a similar test case which would show the failure. Wh

Re: Deleting Makefile.in in maintainer-clean

2001-05-17 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Gary> I have always tried to have maintainer-clean revert the source Gary> tree to the state it was in when freshly checked out of CVS. This is easy enough to do; there is a tool in the `cvsutils' (Pavel's, not Alexandre's) which will re

Re: install-strip rule doesn't work

2001-05-17 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Akim> Nonetheless, I keep on thinking this is overkill, and would like to Akim> resubmit my proposal, part of the aforementioned thread: Akim> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/automake/2001-03/msg00151.html I'd still prefer not to do this.

Re: depcomp used but not installed

2001-05-17 Thread Tom Tromey
Pavel> AM_DEPENDENCIES should be more quiet if it cannot find depcomp. Alexandre> I think this would be a good compromise. Assuming Alexandre> depmode=none would be fine, in this case. This sounds good to me. I'm checking this in. Tom

Re: Mac OS X

2001-05-17 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Paul" == Paul F Kunz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Paul> bundle: Paul> rm -rf */*.o Paul> c++ -bundle -I/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Headers \ Paul> -I. -o libhippoplot.jnilib -framework JavaVM \ Paul> jni/*.cxx pattern/*.cxx reps/*.cxx src/*.cxx transforms/*.cxx \ Pa

Re: depcomp used but not installed

2001-05-17 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Pavel" == Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Pavel> I've written depcomp2.test that demonstrates the problem. Thanks, I'm checking this in. Tom

Re: *_TEXINFOS

2001-05-17 Thread Tom Tromey
[ where to build info files ] >> Sometimes I wonder if this is really the right thing to do. Alexandre> Perhaps it should be an option? I think for now I'm just going to leave it as-is. It works, and we haven't had a huge number of complaints. I'm more interested in getting 1.5 out than on ch

Re: pr19.test

2001-05-17 Thread Tom Tromey
> "edward" == edward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I'm finally reading this thread. I haven't finished it yet, so what I say may make little sense :-( edward> # FIXME: nodist. edward> &push_dist_common ($pfx . $base . '.' . $ext); edward> commenting out the last line removes foo.

Re: PATCH 2/2: Unconditional use of install-sh for install-strip (Re: cross-install-strip summary)

2001-05-17 Thread Tom Tromey
> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: adl> I'm not sure this is the right place to document this. adl> 2001-03-06 Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> adl>* automake.texi (Requirements): Document the use of the STRIP adl>variable in cross-compilation enviro

Re: PATCH 1/2: Unconditional use of install-sh for install-strip (Re: cross-install-strip summary)

2001-05-17 Thread Tom Tromey
> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: adl> 2001-03-06 Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> adl>* install.am (install-strip): Set INSTALL_PROGRAM_ENV if STRIP is adl>not empty. adl>* m4/strip.m4 (AM_PROG_INSTALL_STRIP): Set INSTALL_STRIP_PROGRAM adl>

Re: Mac OS X

2001-05-17 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Paul" == Paul F Kunz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Paul> So on a Mac OS X platform, I would want effiectively the Paul> following... Paul> cd hippo; make # compiles the Java Paul> cd jni; make # creates JNI headers and compiles the C++ in jni/ Paul> make bundle SUBDIRS = hippo jni .

Re: `make dist' with srcdir != builddir

2001-05-17 Thread Tom Tromey
> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: adl> Some weeks ago Bruno Haible reported (in private mail) that adl> running `make dist' with srcdir != builddir could produce adl> distributions which are not up-to-date, especially if you have adl> generated files like bison parse

Re: m4/strip.m4 is still broken

2001-05-17 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Jim" == Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jim> Here's the patch you've seen at least twice before. Yeah, yeah, Jim> I know that there was some discussion about alternate (more Jim> invasive?) plans to fix the problem, but in the mean time, how Jim> about this one: Thanks for the r

Re: ultrix and 'missing'?

2001-05-17 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Harlan" == Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Harlan> 2 problems. First, since ../util/ansi2knr isn't found, an Harlan> "empty" foo_.c file gets created. I think the line needs Harlan> "... || rm foo_.c" stapled on the end. I agree. Harlan> Second, there seems to be a dependency

Re: ultrix and 'missing'?

2001-05-17 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Harlan" == Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Harlan> Second, there seems to be a dependency problem. Tom> I was able to write a test and reproduce this. Tom> I'll check the test in soon. I was mistaken -- I was able to write a

Re: Mac OS X

2001-05-17 Thread Paul F. Kunz
> On Thu, 17 May 2001 18:03:33 -0600, Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > "Paul" == Paul F Kunz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Paul> bundle: rm -rf */*.o c++ -bundle Paul> -I/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Headers \ -I. -o Paul> libhippoplot.jnilib -framework JavaVM \ jni/*.c

Re: ultrix and 'missing'?

2001-05-17 Thread Harlan Stenn
Sure, how can I help? I bet the first thing is to get CVS automake on that box... Harlan

Re: Deleting Makefile.in in maintainer-clean

2001-05-17 Thread Reinhard Müller
"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: > That's interesting. I have always tried to have maintainer-clean revert the > source tree to the state it was in when freshly checked out of CVS. Giving > this some thought, it seems to be something that can't easily be fully > automated by automake since people have v

Re: depcomp used but not installed

2001-05-17 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On May 17, 2001, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > AM_DEPENDENCIES should be more quiet if it cannot find depcomp. I think this would be a good compromise. Assuming depmode=none would be fine, in this case. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red

Re: *_TEXINFOS

2001-05-17 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On May 17, 2001, Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sometimes I wonder if this is really the right thing to do. Perhaps it should be an option? I often use read-only srcdir myself, so I'd like to have this possibility. Anyway, since we do update files that are part of the distribution (th

m4/strip.m4 is still broken

2001-05-17 Thread Jim Meyering
Here's the patch you've seen at least twice before. Yeah, yeah, I know that there was some discussion about alternate (more invasive?) plans to fix the problem, but in the mean time, how about this one: Any objections? Index: m4/strip.m4 ==

Re: Deleting Makefile.in in maintainer-clean

2001-05-17 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Thursday 17 May 2001 4:19 am, Tom Tromey wrote: > > "Reinhard" == Reinhard Mller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Reinhard> I am just reading the GNU coding standards (chapter 7.2.5 - > Reinhard> Standard Make Targets) and I see that it's recommended that > Reinhard> maintainer-clean should

depcomp used but not installed

2001-05-17 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! The conditions under which Automake installs and uses the "depmod" script are different. It can actually happen that it's not installed but configure tries to use it. For example, GNU Midnight Commander is using Automake only on the top level and for data directories. Automake doesn't see

Re: Mac OS X

2001-05-17 Thread Paul F. Kunz
Just to share with the list what I had to do to do a build on a Max OS X platform. I don't have access to such a machine, but someone with one told me what he had to do to do a build = In my top level Makefile.am, I added the target... bundle: rm -rf */*.o c++ -bundle -I/Sys

Vos cartes de visite

2001-05-17 Thread Cartevisite.com
Bonjour, Avez vous pensé à vos cartes de visite ? www.cartevisite.com, le leader des cartes de visite sur Internet vous propose une réduction "découverte" de 20 F sur l'impression de vos prochaines cartes de visite. A partir de 339 Fht pour 250 exemplaires en couleur sur papier de qualité en