Re: {testsuite-work} [PATCH] tests: avoid spurious failures in cross-compile mode

2011-05-19 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Thursday 19 May 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On Wednesday 18 May 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Can you use 'native' instead of 'non-cross' and go ahead with > > that? That would fit the lingo better. > > > Of course. I never liked 'non-cross' very much, but I failed to > come up with a

Re: {testsuite-work} [PATCH] tests: avoid spurious failures in cross-compile mode

2011-05-19 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Wednesday 18 May 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, May 18, 2011 at 06:19:55PM CEST: > > I will wait until tomorrow for a review, before pushing. > > I really don't have the time to do a close review right now, > Bummer :-( > but can you use 'nati

Re: {testsuite-work} [PATCH] tests: avoid spurious failures in cross-compile mode

2011-05-18 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Stefano, * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, May 18, 2011 at 06:19:55PM CEST: > I will wait until tomorrow for a review, before pushing. I really don't have the time to do a close review right now, but can you use 'native' instead of 'non-cross' and go ahead with that? That would fit the lingo