Hey David,
thanks for your answer,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:54:57AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
From: Sven Eckelmann s...@narfation.org
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 07:34:12 +0200
_You_ were the person that declined the pull request because _you_ wanted
to
rewrite the ARP handling. So
Hello David,
we are a little bit in a pinch here - the DAT feature sent with this
patchset was developed for a long time, and we need your decision to move on
as more and more patches depend on it:
* should we rewrite DAT to use our own ARP table/backend or
* can we use the ARP neighbor table
From: Sven Eckelmann s...@narfation.org
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 07:34:12 +0200
_You_ were the person that declined the pull request because _you_ wanted to
rewrite the ARP handling. So _you_ are the person that has the insight in
_your_ plans. Either _you_ tell us what is _your_ problem with
David,
On Tuesday, May 01, 2012 08:59:04 David Miller wrote:
From: Antonio Quartulli or...@autistici.org
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 00:22:30 +0200
However this patch also contains a procedure which queries the neigh
table in order to understand whether a given host is known or not.
David,
On Tuesday, May 01, 2012 08:59:04 David Miller wrote:
From: Antonio Quartulli or...@autistici.org
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 00:22:30 +0200
However this patch also contains a procedure which queries the neigh
table in order to understand whether a given host is known or not.
Would it
From: Antonio Quartulli or...@autistici.org
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:57:38 +0200
In case of an ARP message going in or out the soft_iface, it is intercepted
and
a special action is performed. In particular the DHT helper functions
previously
implemented are used to store all the ARP
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 01:05:55 -0400, David Miller wrote:
From: Antonio Quartulli or...@autistici.org
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:57:38 +0200
In case of an ARP message going in or out the soft_iface, it is intercepted
and
a special action is performed. In particular the DHT helper
From: Antonio Quartulli or...@autistici.org
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 00:22:30 +0200
However this patch also contains a procedure which queries the neigh table in
order to understand whether a given host is known or not.
Would it be possible to do that in another way (Without manually touching the