> -Original Message-
> From: owner-backst...@lists.bbc.co.uk
> [mailto:owner-backst...@lists.bbc.co.uk] On Behalf Of Mo McRoberts
> Sent: 27 January 2010 22:38
> To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
> Subject: [backstage] iPad
>
> So, what does everyone think?
(disclaimer: I generally hate A
2010/1/27 Mo McRoberts :
> So, what does everyone think?
>
> (and how much effect will it have on the situation over the
> next 18 months or so, do we reckon?)
It's just a big iPhone AFAICT*. Popularising the idea that not
everything runs Flash might be educate some web developers, I suppose.
S
So, what does everyone think?
(and how much effect will it have on the situation over the
next 18 months or so, do we reckon?)
M.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list a
Well exactly, there are THREE main desktops, and one doesn't and wont have
h264 preinstalled.
This wouldn't be a problem if The Guardian and other news broadcasters
stopped bystanding and made the videos they publish available in Xiph
formats earlier; they continue to squander their significant in
> That's on-demand content, not broadcast. The two are encoded
> via separate systems.
Were we not talking about the iPlayer videos?... derp
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Un
On 27 Jan 2010, at 11:59, Christopher Woods wrote:
>> On 27 Jan 2010, at 08:31, Mo McRoberts wrote:
>>> that's a good point: I wonder how much of the broadcast output *is*
>>> encoded in real-time? all of it?
>>
>> I believe so.
>
>
> Not unless they've changed their previous policy of ingesti
> On 27 Jan 2010, at 08:31, Mo McRoberts wrote:
> > that's a good point: I wonder how much of the broadcast output *is*
> > encoded in real-time? all of it?
>
> I believe so.
Not unless they've changed their previous policy of ingesting popular /
headline shows prior to their airing, then maki
On 27 Jan 2010, at 08:31, Mo McRoberts wrote:
> that's a good point: I wonder how much of the broadcast output *is*
> encoded in real-time? all of it?
I believe so.
> after all, live programming is in the minority on BBC1-4, and assuming
> things sit on sensible boundaries and are pre-packetised
Kieran Kunhya wrote:
For 720p25 you might need more than 3.5Mbps for more
demanding scenes. (Except increasing the bitrate or using a
better encoder will make iPlayer look better than the
broadcast...)
You do get an awful lot better results when you
are not compressing in real time, of course, b
From: Brian Butterworth
> On DVB-T it is everything. BBC One used to have reserved bandwidth, but is
> now statmuxed with everything else. My assumption is the BBC delivers
> motion-JPEG to the regional encoders and the services are statmuxed from
> there.
Don't know the gory technical details,
For those with both a serious Eddie Marr habit and also have iPhones and
Droids needing ringtones, here's the 82 versions as downloadable links...
http://www.ukfree.tv/pm/
(donations to http://www.dec.org.uk/item/200 please)
--
Brian Butterworth
follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/brianti
> For 720p25 you might need more than 3.5Mbps for more
> demanding scenes. (Except increasing the bitrate or using a
> better encoder will make iPlayer look better than the
> broadcast...)
>
> You do get an awful lot better results when you
> are not compressing in real time, of course, because yo
2010/1/27 Mo McRoberts
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 08:20, Brian Butterworth
> wrote:
>
> > You do get an awful lot better results when you are not compressing in
> real
> > time, of course, because you can use all the MPEG4 forward references,
> the
> > ones you don't get when you real time encode
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 08:20, Brian Butterworth wrote:
> You do get an awful lot better results when you are not compressing in real
> time, of course, because you can use all the MPEG4 forward references, the
> ones you don't get when you real time encode.
that's a good point: I wonder how muc
2010/1/26 Kieran Kunhya
>
>
> For 720p25 you might need more than 3.5Mbps for more demanding scenes.
> (Except increasing the bitrate or using a better encoder will make iPlayer
> look better than the broadcast...)
>
You do get an awful lot better results when you are not compressing in real
tim
15 matches
Mail list logo
