Re: [Bacula-users] Strange behaviour with Mutliple Run statements in Job Resource

2009-03-26 Thread Andreas Bogacki
Andreas Bogacki schrieb: > Hi, > > I seem to have found a problem with multiple Run statments in a Job > resource. > My setup is a bit strange due to too little storage in one place so I > set up some migrate jobs. > > scheduled backup1 Job writes to filestorage1 &

[Bacula-users] Strange behaviour with Mutliple Run statements in Job Resource

2009-03-26 Thread Andreas Bogacki
behaviour is somewhat wrong. Is there any way to define dependecies between jobs that go deeper than just "start this single job befor this one is run" or will I have to create staggered schedules with all jobs having the same priority. thanks for your help Andre

Re: [Bacula-users] Job Migration on setup with lots of file storages

2009-03-10 Thread Andreas Bogacki
Media Type="File" have="Storage_1-file" > > When I set Media Type = File for Storage_1-dev and > Migrate_Storage_1-dev > > the Migration works. > > So right now c

[Bacula-users] Job Migration on setup with lots of file storages

2009-03-04 Thread Andreas Bogacki
stion that arises is: How can I setup a system with concurent backups for all clients that migrates jobs that need to be archived for a long time (2+ years) on one tape-changer device? Versions used: debian lenny with bacula 2.4.4 (28 December 2008) x86_64-pc-linux-gnu debian lenny/sid ch