ory
From: Michael Schwager
mailto:mschwa...@mochotrading.com>>
Date: Thursday, August 13, 2015 at 1:09 PM
To: Heitor Faria mailto:hei...@bacula.com.br>>
Cc: bacula-users
mailto:bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula daemon message- where did it
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Heitor Faria wrote:
> I agree with Ana with the fact it is probably not a bug. Even in the
> hypothesis Bacula is sending delayed messages this is the reason there is a
> time stamp on each log message. Yes: the connection error happened. Yes:
> daemon messages ca
My mailbox is in CDT (5 hours behind UTC). The backup host is in UTC, hence
the log entries (and mail headers, too, btw) show times in UTC.
This is why I created the logging frontend script: in order to debug
Becula's mail messaging, I want to see what *Bacula* is trying to do; I
don't want to get
instead (for example Ana’s mail I’m replying to has a
>> timestamp of 4:06 inside, but in Outlook’s message list it says 4:09).
>> From: Ana Emília M. Arruda [mailto: emiliaarr...@gmail.com ]
>> Sent: 12 August 2015 4:06
>> To: Michael Schwager < mschwa...@mochotrading.com
mailto:emiliaarr...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 12 August 2015 4:06
> *To:* Michael Schwager
> *Cc:* Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Subject:* Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula daemon message- where did it come
> from?
>
>
>
> Hello Michael,
>
> From your first post, the header o
4:06
To: Michael Schwager
Cc: Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula daemon message- where did it come from?
Hello Michael,
From your first post, the header of the email shows a 6:00 AM time, not the
11:00 AM. Are your sure they are the same e-mails? Is there any
Hello Michael,
From your first post, the header of the email shows a 6:00 AM time, not
the 11:00 AM. Are your sure they are the same e-mails? Is there any other
e-mail in bac...@example.com mailbox that arrived at 11:00 AM?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bacula
Date: Sun, Aug 9,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Martin Simmons
wrote:
>
> Looks like a bug to me (I've just created
> http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=2159).
Thanks. I have contributed to your bug report.
*- Mike Schwager (aka, "The Most Greyish of Gnomes")*
* Linux Network Engineer, Mocho Trading LL
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Andreas Nastke
wrote:
> check the mail-headers ('received-from' etc.) to find out
> which servers were involved.
>
I did that, but in any event my own logging (see my reply to Ana on this
thread) shows that Bacula certainly sent a message, and it was at that tim
Thanks for the reply, Ana. But the mail *was* from Bacula. My
bacula-dir.conf looks like this:
Messages {
Name = Daemon
mailcommand = "/usr/local/bin/my_smtp -h mailhub -f \"\(Bacula\) \<
bac...@example.com\>\" -s \"Bacula daemon message\" %r"
...so I can debug those sneaky mail problems :-)
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 09:01:43 -0500, Michael Schwager said:
>
> Hello,
> Yesterday (Sunday) I received an email from bacula-dir but I don't know
> why. It contains old authentication error messages from a week ago (see
> below) that I'd rectified on the 03 August later in the day. I don't kno
hi,
check the mail-headers ('received-from' etc.) to find out
which servers were involved.
Michael Schwager schrieb:
> Hello,
> Yesterday (Sunday) I received an email from bacula-dir but I don't know
> why. It contains old authentication error messages from a week ago (see
> below) that I'd rect
Hello Michael,
It seems not to be an issue with Bacula. Instead, maybe this mail had been
queued in your system and relayed at a later time.
Best regards,
Ana
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Michael Schwager <
mschwa...@mochotrading.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> Yesterday (Sunday) I received an emai
Hello,
Yesterday (Sunday) I received an email from bacula-dir but I don't know
why. It contains old authentication error messages from a week ago (see
below) that I'd rectified on the 03 August later in the day. I don't know
why I received this message now, and I'd like to prevent it from recurring
14 matches
Mail list logo
