No problem with that.
Fariborz
__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTE
" What at one time would have been interpreted as heresy, is accepted now in
that there is no direct link between man and ape (No intermediate soecies as
the Master suggested) and once was thought to be true."
Dear Fariborz,
Yes, if what is meant by a 'missing link' is that there is no intermedia
My point as regards the 'missing link' was that scientific understanding is
fluid and changes over time. What at one time would have been interpreted as
heresy, is accepted now in that there is no direct link between man and ape (No
intermediate soecies as the Master suggested) and once was t
Oh, I should have mentioned since the issue
of jaw structure was raised, that it is with homo erectus that the jaw begins to
change shape. Most scientists think this had to do with changes in breathing
patterns due to the development of speech.
warmest, Susan
_
In a message dated 12/11/2004 12:04:20 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Second,
there is a discussion about radiocarbon dating, which is our best method for
dating fossils less than 30,000 years old. Let's go back in time to 1912. At
Piltdown near Sussex a skull
Here is a paste from the book regarding the issue:
"Second, there is a discussion about radiocarbon dating, which is our best
method for dating fossils less than 30,000 years old. Let's go back in time to
1912. At Piltdown near Sussex a skull had been found in a gravel pit that had a
modern
>>Thanks for listening. I look forward to your comments, offline if you
>>choose.<<
You wrote:
>>The human species is original. All other species are as well. The blue print
>>of future humans has been present for billions of years within the matrix of
>>the biological genome. When the necessar
In a message dated 12/10/2004 7:38:38 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Linking what to what? Because we
have a pretty complete fossil record going back to the Austalopithecus.
And yet the actual "linking" creature from which man and ape descended
eludes us. We do
"I think you'd find
in a scientific way that the Master is not only correct but also gives
us additional Spiritual insight. Recall that when the Master said
there will never be " Missing Link" during His talk at Stanford
University many people felt that it was scientific heresy! Time has pro
Dear Friends,
I don't know enough to comment about the "Ether". As to the question
about Human Evolution and Master's remarks in Some Answered Questions, I'd refer
you to this link of my book on Human Evolution. I think you'd find in a
scientific way that the Master is not only correct but
In a message dated 12/10/04 8:46:54 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When I heard a most prominent BahaâI describe anyone who questions a literally inerrant understanding of infallibility as being an attacker of the faith, it curdled my blood.
Dear Ron,
Good to see you bac
Brent, thank you for a very thoughtful reply. It certainly helps me to
understand how you think about these kinds of issues and why you believe as you
do. I think that there probably are many Baha's who have similar views as
yours. Your thoughtful analysis and sensitive approach are appreciated
Ron wrote:
>>I brought up two examples of areas where a strictly literal view of the
>>infallibility of the Writings (in this case the Writings of Abdul Baha) leads
>>some Baha'is to see the necessity to dis-believe in the science of evolution
>>and quantum physics. Do you believe in the need
13 matches
Mail list logo
