On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Darkseid wrote:
> Yes, yes, I know, I know. While I'm no vi or emacs guru, I've paired (for a
> fair amount of time) with experienced VI and Emacs users. Snippets, Ctags
> etc. help a great deal - but have you ever worked with an AST aware
> development environment
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Darkseid wrote:
> Yes, yes, I know, I know. While I'm no vi or emacs guru, I've paired (for a
> fair amount of time) with experienced VI and Emacs users. Snippets, Ctags
> etc. help a great deal - but have you ever worked with an AST aware
> development environmen
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Darkseid wrote:
>>
>> 2. It's easy to hire an IDE-aware monkey to do programming in "proven
>> technology"
>
> I do most of my work in Ruby (and have done for a few years now). Every day
> I bemoan the lack of a powerful refactoring IDE like Java has in IntelliJ. A
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Darkseid wrote:
>
>> 2. It's easy to hire an IDE-aware monkey to do programming in "proven
>> technology"
>>
> I do most of my work in Ruby (and have done for a few years now). Every day
> I bemoan the lack of a powerful refactoring IDE like Java has in IntelliJ.
Yeah, that too :)
Someday I will get of my ass and become a Emacs power user. Until then
I'm muddling along with TextMate, snippets and a bunch of custom shell
scripts. Of course
http://martinfowler.com/bliki/IntentionalSoftware.html could become
production ready first, in which case I may ta
Yes, yes, I know, I know. While I'm no vi or emacs guru, I've paired
(for a fair amount of time) with experienced VI and Emacs users.
Snippets, Ctags etc. help a great deal - but have you ever worked with
an AST aware development environment where you can safely make
structural changes across y
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Darkseid wrote:
> you can only get so far with a
> text editor*, no matter how many macros you have set up. Honestly.
>
Macros?? Really??? Don't you mean "no matter how many scripts you
have set up" :)
___
BangPype
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Darkseid wrote:
>>
>> 2. It's easy to hire an IDE-aware monkey to do programming in "proven
>> technology"
>
> I do most of my work in Ruby (and have done for a few years now). Every day
> I bemoan the lack of a powerful refactoring IDE like Java has in IntelliJ. A
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Darkseid wrote:
>
>> 2. It's easy to hire an IDE-aware monkey to do programming in "proven
>> technology"
>>
> I do most of my work in Ruby (and have done for a few years now). Every day
> I bemoan the lack of a powerful refactoring IDE like Java has in IntelliJ.
VS is no just-text editor. But hey, that's a flame war waiting to happen!
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Darkseid wrote:
>
>> 2. It's easy to hire an IDE-aware monkey to do programming in "proven
>> technology"
>>
> I do most of my work in Ruby (and have done for a few years now). Every day
2. It's easy to hire an IDE-aware monkey to do programming in "proven
technology"
I do most of my work in Ruby (and have done for a few years now). Every
day I bemoan the lack of a powerful refactoring IDE like Java has in
IntelliJ. A good IDE is a massive productivity booster; you can only get
11 matches
Mail list logo
