Gregory Machin wrote:
Hi
Please can you advise. I's been ages since I have configured dnssec .
I used nsupdate (with dnssec) to update a zone file with all the host
current ip's so that they are reachable via a host name even when the
ip has changed (a dyndns.org type of thing). Everything seems
BIND 9.6.2b1 is now available.
BIND 9.6.2b1 is a maintenance release for BIND 9.6.
BIND 9.6.2b1 can be downloaded from
ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.6.2b1/bind-9.6.2b1.tar.gz
The PGP signature of the distribution is at
ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.6.2b
Hi
Please can you advise. I's been ages since I have configured dnssec .
I used nsupdate (with dnssec) to update a zone file with all the host
current ip's so that they are reachable via a host name even when the
ip has changed (a dyndns.org type of thing). Everything seems to work
fine named acce
> From: Mark Andrews
> In message <20091210.162242.460114267490885968.fujiw...@pyon.org>,
> fujiw...@wid
> e.ad.jp writes:
>> I'm using BIND 9.7.0b3 an DLV (dns-lookaside auto;).
>>
>> The named tried to write "managed-keys.bind" file into the named's
>> working directory.
>>
>> The current BIN
> Thank you! Evan,
>
> I have not VisualStudio which is commercial. Do you think I can use an other
> compiler or do you think VisualStudio light is enough (Version 2008 seems
> available).
I'm sorry, I don't know. Try it and see. If it works, let me know, and
we'll add the information to the
Hello All,
As per ISC security bulletin *CVE-2009-4022* There is a problem with BIND 9
Cache Update From Additional Section
*Problem Description:* A Nameserver with DNSSEC validation enabled may
incorrectly add records to its cache from the additional section of
responses received during resolut
In message <20091210.162242.460114267490885968.fujiw...@pyon.org>, fujiw...@wid
e.ad.jp writes:
> I'm using BIND 9.7.0b3 an DLV (dns-lookaside auto;).
>
> The named tried to write "managed-keys.bind" file into the named's
> working directory.
>
> The current BIND 9 requires the working directory
Thank you very much for your help; I'll forward the conversation to the
bug-tracking list.
Since these are my first DNSSEC experiments, I just wanted to make sure that it
wasn't a problem with my understanding of the concept.
Niobos
On 10 Dec 2009, at 00:59, Hauke Lampe wrote:
> The signatures
8 matches
Mail list logo