Klein
To: ju wusuo
Cc: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: Anycast DNS - LB/LTM
Exactly. The script runs inside the LTM, and wraps "nslookup" or "dig". It
should output a distinct output for success, and another dist
Klein
To: ju wusuo
Cc: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2012 11:18 PM
Subject: Re: Anycast DNS
You would need to create a custom script to use as your monitor, which does a
lookup of an address that you know will always be in your domain. If that
fails,
thanks everyone for all responses with the great inputs ..
now if I want to put the DNS servers behind LBs, 1) would the LTMs be able to
announce the routes dynamically for the DNS servers, and a VIP can be withdrawn
when the site is gone? 2) would the LTMs be able to detect a DNS service
fai
Have seen some anycast DNS implementations using more than one address, some
times even on the same subnet, any considerations or reasons for doing that? ___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
b
need to use it to send out iterative queries, instead of recursive ones (if
using forwarding).
From: Feng He <short...@gmail.com>
To: ju wusuo <juwu...@yahoo.com>
Cc: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" <bind-users@lists.isc.org>
Sent: Tu
Thanks Mark .. I think that probably is the misunderstanding of the
"delegation" usage part.
From: Mark Andrews
To: ju wusuo
Cc: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 9:57 PM
Subject: Re: stub zone
In message <131
Would like to use the BIND stub zone function, however, heard that ISC
considers stopping support to stub zone in the future, is that true? ___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mail
this is just a benchmark kind of stress test with authoritative records, query
logging has been disabled.
Emil Natan
>run queryperf on the same server and got a not bad number at around 60,000
>qps,
>however, the cpu and memory are far from used up, what else could be the
>limiting factor
no seems not the case as cpu is only at about 60%.
p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
ju wusuo writes:
> run queryperf on the same server and got a not bad number at around 60,000
> qps,
>however, the cpu and memory are far from used up, what else could be the
>limiting factors for ge
run queryperf on the same server and got a not bad number at around 60,000 qps,
however, the cpu and memory are far from used up, what else could be the
limiting factors for getting higher qps numbers?
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@list
10 matches
Mail list logo
