Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fwd: [bitcoin-core-dev] On the initial notice of CVE-2018-17144

2018-09-22 Thread sickpig--- via bitcoin-dev
Gregory, > For some reason I don't understand, Andrea Suisani is stating on > twitter that the the report by awemany was a report of an inflation > bug, contrary to the timeline we published. guess that the fact you don't understand it, it's probably related to the fact that you didn't read prope

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Block size: It's economics & user preparation & moral hazard

2015-12-18 Thread sickpig--- via bitcoin-dev
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > - only assuming robust adoption rates by up-layer ecosystem software, and > > That's not required. Everyone who individually switches to new > transactions gets to do 1.75x more tra

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Segregated Witness in the context of Scaling Bitcoin

2015-12-18 Thread sickpig--- via bitcoin-dev
Anthony, On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 04:51:19PM +0100, sickpig--- via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Jorge Timón wrote: > > > Unless I&#

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Segregated Witness in the context of Scaling Bitcoin

2015-12-17 Thread sickpig--- via bitcoin-dev
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Jorge Timón < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > Unless I'm missing something, 2 mb x4 = 8mb, so bip102 + SW is already > equivalent to the 2-4-8 "compromise" proposal (which by the way I never > liked, because I don't think anybody should be in a po