Matt Whitlock wrote:
> Okay, you've convinced me. However, it looks like the consensus here is
> that my BIP is unneeded, so I'm not sure it would be worth the effort
> for me to improve it with your suggestions.
I need your BIP.
We are going to implement SSS and we'd rather stick with something
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 07:51 +0200, Wladimir wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 6:47 AM, devrandom
> wrote:
> Nice!
>
> I wonder how much of this could be scripted.
>
>
> Everything, probably, using vmbuilder (and/or vagrant as Nick Simpson
> suggests). But that's not the
On Thursday, 3 April 2014, at 4:41 pm, Nikita Schmidt wrote:
> I agree with the recently mentioned suggestion to make non-essential
> metadata, namely key fingerprint and degree (M), optional. Their
> 4-byte and 1-byte fields can be added individually at an
> implementation's discretion. During d
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Matt Whitlock wrote:
> Okay, you've convinced me. However, it looks like the consensus here is that
> my BIP is unneeded, so I'm not sure it would be worth the effort for me to
> improve it with your suggestions.
Discussion of whether you should or should not us
Matt Whitlock wrote:
> The creation date in your BIP header has the wrong format. It should be
> 01-04-2014, per BIP 1.
>
At first, I thought this was a second April Fool's joke, but then I
looked and saw that all of the BIPs really do use this format. As far
as I can tell, we are using this in
5 matches
Mail list logo
