--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-08-08 09:42
---
Hi Stephane,
My apologese for taking so long to get back to this issue.
You are right - the addresses and lengths are being incorrectly truncated. I
am going to apply the newly uploaded patch to fix this.
C
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-08-08 09:41
---
Created an attachment (id=1211)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1211&action=view)
Display 8 byte addresses as 8 byte values
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2768
--
--- Additional Comments From stephane dot chauveau at philips dot com
2006-06-28 10:01 ---
I checked the pathc and it seems to work fine.
The only remaining problem is the one I described in comment 8
The overall size when both the ponter and segment size are 4 bytes is 64 bit but
only
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2768
--- You are receiving this mail because:
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-06-22 14:38
---
Created an attachment (id=)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=&action=view)
Compute address size as sum of pointer size and segment size
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-06-22 14:36
---
Hi Stephane,
Thanks for supplying the test cases. I have now been able to reproduce the
problem and I am going to upload a patch that fixes it. If you would care to
try it out and let me know if you encounter
--- Additional Comments From stephane dot chauveau at philips dot com
2006-06-15 09:21 ---
A few more remarks:
(1) Because of the alignment constraints, it is probably safe to assume that the
total size of each address (including the segment) will be a power of two.
Readelf should be
--- Additional Comments From stephane dot chauveau at philips dot com
2006-06-15 08:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=1094)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1094&action=view)
Proper version of a_4_4.elf
A proper version of the previous sample a_4_4.elf.
Readelf does
--- Additional Comments From stephane dot chauveau at philips dot com
2006-06-15 08:24 ---
(From update of attachment 1093)
The ELF file is incorrect (the end marker in a .debug_arange section is
2*4bytes instead of 2*8bytes)
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From stephane dot chauveau at philips dot com
2006-06-15 08:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=1093)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1093&action=view)
elf file with address_size=4 and segment_size=4
In the two previous samples, I rely on the
--- Additional Comments From stephane dot chauveau at philips dot com
2006-06-15 07:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=1092)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1092&action=view)
elf file with address_size=3 bytes and segmen_sizet=1byte
In that version, I indicate expli
--- Additional Comments From stephane dot chauveau at philips dot com
2006-06-15 07:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=1091)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1091&action=view)
reference elf file (not segmented)
in that version, the arange section is not explictly seg
--- Additional Comments From stephane dot chauveau at philips dot com
2006-06-15 07:41 ---
I am currently trying to implement DWARF2 support for our architectures so I can
only provide samples that show my current interpretation of the specs.
More precisely, our architectures are not e
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-06-14 16:36
---
Hi Stephane,
Can you provide an example object file containing debug information for a
segmented address architecture ?
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |Added
--
14 matches
Mail list logo