Escarrilla, Harold wrote:
> /u/hescarri 29$ date -d"2009-10-30 + 3 days"
> Sun Nov 1 23:00:00 EST 2009
>
> It should be Nov 2.
What version of date are you using?
date --version
I cannot recreate this behavior with a recent version of date.
$ date -d"2009-10-30 + 3 days"
Mon Nov 2 00:0
Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Jim Meyering on 10/31/2009 1:57 AM:
>>> With this patch, and a bump to the latest gnulib[*], I can (once again)
>>> compile coreutils on cygwin 1.5 with --enable-gcc-warnings. Does it look
>>> okay to commit, once gnulib falls into place?
>>
>> This looks fine. Te
/u/hescarri 29$ date -d"2009-10-30 + 3 days"
Sun Nov 1 23:00:00 EST 2009
It should be Nov 2.
Harold Escarrilla
Morgan Stanley | Technology & Data
1 New York Plaza, 12th Floor | New York, NY 10004
Phone: +1 212 276-3206
harold.escarri...@morganstanley.com
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jim Meyering on 10/31/2009 1:57 AM:
>> With this patch, and a bump to the latest gnulib[*], I can (once again)
>> compile coreutils on cygwin 1.5 with --enable-gcc-warnings. Does it look
>> okay to commit, once gnulib falls into place?
>
Jim Meyering meyering.net> writes:
> > the default template is tmp.XX, do we want to continue to guarantee
> > that we generate a file such as tmp.abcdef1234,
>
> Why change?
Good point. As part of my gnulib work, I guess that means I'll have to
regenerate the coreutils patch to gen_t
Burba, Viktor wrote:
> I have a problem with output from "who" command. As you can see below
>
> busdm:~ # who -u
> root pts/0Nov 2 15:56 . 21861 (192.168.0.20)
> root pts/6Jun 18 13:04 ? 15579 (10.11.20.1)
>
> busdm:~ # uptime
> 4:06pm up 3 days 2
Eric Blake wrote:
> Now that glibc 2.11 has mkostemps, and I'm working on adding that to gnulib,
> it
Good to hear it.
> would be nice to expose the idea of an explicit suffix to temporary file
> names. But rather than require the user to count how long their suffix is, I
> imagine it would mak
Now that glibc 2.11 has mkostemps, and I'm working on adding that to gnulib, it
would be nice to expose the idea of an explicit suffix to temporary file
names. But rather than require the user to count how long their suffix is, I
imagine it would make more sense to give mktemp(1) some do-what-I
Burba, Viktor wrote:
> Dear GNU team,
>
> I have a problem with output from "who" command. As you can see below
>
> busdm:~ # who -u
> root pts/0Nov 2 15:56 . 21861 (192.168.0.20)
> root pts/6Jun 18 13:04 ? 15579 (10.11.20.1)
>
> busdm:~ # uptime
>
Dear GNU team,
I have a problem with output from "who" command. As you can see below
busdm:~ # who -u
root pts/0Nov 2 15:56 . 21861 (192.168.0.20)
root pts/6Jun 18 13:04 ? 15579 (10.11.20.1)
busdm:~ # uptime
4:06pm up 3 days 2:19, 2 users, load
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009, Justin White wrote:
I have been using the sort command for years with a syntax as follows:
cat $file | sort -t, +1
This is addressed in the FAQ:
http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/coreutils-faq.html#Old-tail-plus-N-syntax-now-fails
In short, sort is treating "+1" a
I have been using the sort command for years with a syntax as follows:
cat $file | sort -t, +1
I create filesystems on Linux and AIX from a CSV file and sort by the second
column as shown above.
Recently I have tried this command on RHEL 5.1 and it fails. So I went and
tried on Ubuntu 9.04 and
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
>
> > Jim Meyering wrote:
> >> Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
> >> > Jim Meyering wrote:
> >> >> Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
> >> >> > I'm wondering why there are so many tests (in coreutils-8.0( run by
> >> >> >
> >> >> > sudo env PATH="$PATH" NON_ROOT_US
Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
>> > Jim Meyering wrote:
>> >> Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
>> >> > I'm wondering why there are so many tests (in coreutils-8.0( run by
>> >> >
>> >> > sudo env PATH="$PATH" NON_ROOT_USERNAME=$USER make -k check-root
>> >>
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
> > Jim Meyering wrote:
> >> Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
> >> > I'm wondering why there are so many tests (in coreutils-8.0( run by
> >> >
> >> > sudo env PATH="$PATH" NON_ROOT_USERNAME=$USER make -k check-root
> >> >
> >> > which are skipped with "mu
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
> > building coreutils-8.0 fails on Solaris 10:
> > Undefined first referenced
> >symbol in file
> > eaccess ../lib/libcoreutils.a(euidaccess.o)
> >
> > The symbol i
Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
>> > I'm wondering why there are so many tests (in coreutils-8.0( run by
>> >
>> > sudo env PATH="$PATH" NON_ROOT_USERNAME=$USER make -k check-root
>> >
>> > which are skipped with "must be run as non-root",
>> > e.g. to
17 matches
Mail list logo
