Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The variable are set to 0 in the inet_ntop/inet_pton modules, via a
>> AC_CHECK_DECLS statement.
>
> No, it isn't. AC_CHECK_DECLS([inet_ntop]...) sets the shell variable
> ac_cv_have_decl_inet_ntop to yes or no. It does not set the shell variable
> HAVE_
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> >> +-e 's|@''HAVE_DECL_INET_NTOP''@|$(HAVE_DECL_INET_NTOP)|g' \
> >> +-e 's|@''HAVE_DECL_INET_PTON''@|$(HAVE_DECL_INET_PTON)|g' \
> >> < $(srcdir)/arpa_inet.in.h; \
> >>} > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>mv [EMAIL PROTECTED] $@
> >
> > This cannot be
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> diff --git a/m4/arpa_inet_h.m4 b/m4/arpa_inet_h.m4
>> index 8f530c5..baddf0d 100644
>> --- a/m4/arpa_inet_h.m4
>> +++ b/m4/arpa_inet_h.m4
>> @@ -32,4 +32,7 @@ AC_DEFUN([gl_ARPA_INET_H_DEFAULTS],
>> [
>>GNULIB_INET_NTOP=0;
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> diff --git a/m4/arpa_inet_h.m4 b/m4/arpa_inet_h.m4
> index 8f530c5..baddf0d 100644
> --- a/m4/arpa_inet_h.m4
> +++ b/m4/arpa_inet_h.m4
> @@ -32,4 +32,7 @@ AC_DEFUN([gl_ARPA_INET_H_DEFAULTS],
> [
>GNULIB_INET_NTOP=0; AC_SUBST([GNULIB_INET_NTOP])
>GNULIB_INET_PTO
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Btw, a solaris system I have access to declares the function as follows
> (in system arpa/inet.h):
>
> #if !defined(_XPG4_2) || defined(_XPG6) || defined(__EXTENSIONS__)
> extern int inet_pton(int, const char *_RESTRICT_KYWD, void *_RESTRICT_KYWD);
> extern const char *ine
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> I've tested it better now
>
> It was still apparently tested only on few systems. As you can see
> from doc/posix-functions/inet*.texi, the functions inet_ntop and inet_pton
> need to be declared also on HP-UX 11, OSF/1 4.0, Sola
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I've tested it better now
It was still apparently tested only on few systems. As you can see
from doc/posix-functions/inet*.texi, the functions inet_ntop and inet_pton
need to be declared also on HP-UX 11, OSF/1 4.0, Solaris 2.5.1. So the
gnulib must be used in these case
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>>> I would also favor removing both inet_ntop.h and inet_pton.h, and use
>>> arpa/inet.h for the declarations, as you suggested.
>>
>> Me too.
>
> Yoann, Bruno,
> I've pushed the following, pl
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Simon,
>
>> I would also favor removing both inet_ntop.h and inet_pton.h, and use
>> arpa/inet.h for the declarations, as you suggested.
>
> Me too.
Yoann, Bruno,
I've pushed the following, please test it.
/Simon
>From 33d11481e0930865b73ae2cf69403f
Hi Simon,
> I would also favor removing both inet_ntop.h and inet_pton.h, and use
> arpa/inet.h for the declarations, as you suggested.
Me too.
Bruno
Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Le mardi 22 avril 2008 à 10:54 +0200, Simon Josefsson a écrit :
>> Gnulib's current (minimal) arpa/inet.h for MinGW doesn't declare
>> inet_ntop and inet_pton, which doesn't exist on MinGW. However, gnulib
>> has inet_ntop and inet_
Hi Simon,
Le mardi 22 avril 2008 à 10:54 +0200, Simon Josefsson a écrit :
> Gnulib's current (minimal) arpa/inet.h for MinGW doesn't declare
> inet_ntop and inet_pton, which doesn't exist on MinGW. However, gnulib
> has inet_ntop and inet_pton modules with their own header files. This
> patch ma
Hi,
Gnulib's current (minimal) arpa/inet.h for MinGW doesn't declare
inet_ntop and inet_pton, which doesn't exist on MinGW. However, gnulib
has inet_ntop and inet_pton modules with their own header files. This
patch makes sure that arpa/inet.h provides the expected declarations.
Comments?
Yoann
13 matches
Mail list logo
