https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Jung ---
You attachment is a Safari WebArchive and not usable for non-Safari users.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589
--- Comment #2 from Ruediger Pluem ---
In order to investigate further we would also need:
1. The httpd configuration used for the load test.
2. Information about your load test, e.g. URL's, frequency, number of parallel
requests, protocols us
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589
Ruediger Pluem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--
You are receiving this m
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589
--- Comment #3 from Stefan Eissing ---
There are long HTML lists of some performance figures on their test suites.
Does not tell me anything really. I mean you see that things are slower, but
one as no idea what they do.
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590
Bug ID: 65590
Summary: fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache
2.4.49
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.49
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
S
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590
Ruediger Pluem changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590
--- Comment #2 from Yann Ylavic ---
Created attachment 38043
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38043&action=edit
Handle UDS ("unix:") scheme is mod_rewrite
Maybe the issue is that mod_rewrite does not consider that a "unix
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590
--- Comment #3 from Yann Ylavic ---
Related to bug 57691 ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscr..
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590
--- Comment #4 from Yann Ylavic ---
Created attachment 38044
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38044&action=edit
Handle UDS ("unix:") scheme in mod_rewrite [P]
Or maybe this one instead since the "unix:" scheme is a [P] th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590
Yann Ylavic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38044|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57691
--- Comment #6 from Yann Ylavic ---
Attachment 38045 from bug 65590 is possibly more targeted since the "unix:"
scheme is a mod_proxy thing only.
Would that work for you?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the b
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590
--- Comment #6 from Sylvain Cresto ---
Thanks for your quick reply.
OK I have move RewriteRules in correct Directy section.
I have applied patch 38045 but it does not make different, it does not works.
With fix_uds_filename function from http
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590
Sylvain Cresto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590
--- Comment #7 from Ruediger Pluem ---
Do you have traces for r->filename with the patch applied? Does the 38043
attached patch help?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590
--- Comment #8 from Yann Ylavic ---
(In reply to Sylvain Cresto from comment #6)
> I have applied patch 38045 but it does not make different, it does not works.
Please verify that you are running the patched version, I can't reproduce the
issu
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65591
Bug ID: 65591
Summary: Standard + non-standard SSL port + name-based vhosts +
SNI: Port number disregarded when selecting
certificate?
Product: Apache httpd-2
V
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590
--- Comment #9 from Sylvain Cresto ---
Hi
OK my bad, i haven't applied patch 38043.
With patchs 38043 and 38045 it's now correctly working, thank you !
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61818
--- Comment #7 from Archie Cobbs ---
We had a similar problem where nobody could login just now. The root cause was
that DNS lookups for the OCSP responder were failing.
Our configuration:
SSLUseStapling on
SSLSta
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590
--- Comment #10 from Ruediger Pluem ---
Only one of the patches should be applied. Can you please do tests with only
one of them applied?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589
--- Comment #4 from Judea ---
(In reply to Rainer Jung from comment #1)
> You attachment is a Safari WebArchive and not usable for non-Safari users.
Then download safari
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bu
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589
--- Comment #5 from Yann Ylavic ---
(In reply to Judea from comment #4)
> Then download safari
Then fix it for you..
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590
--- Comment #11 from Sylvain Cresto ---
OK I've just test those patchs.
Patch 38043 is the mandatory patch.
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590
--- Comment #12 from Yann Ylavic ---
Do you mean that 38045 alone is not working?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe,
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589
--- Comment #6 from Judea ---
(In reply to Yann Ylavic from comment #5)
> (In reply to Judea from comment #4)
> > Then download safari
>
> Then fix it for you..
sAfArI cAnNoT dO
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589
--- Comment #7 from Yann Ylavic ---
So it seems that you need help somehow, please provide the requested
informations.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589
--- Comment #8 from Judea ---
(In reply to Ruediger Pluem from comment #2)
> In order to investigate further we would also need:
>
> 1. Coming soon, needs redaction
> 2. Coming soon, needs redaction
> 3. There are no changes other than changin
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589
--- Comment #9 from Judea ---
(In reply to Stefan Eissing from comment #3)
> There are long HTML lists of some performance figures on their test suites.
> Does not tell me anything really. I mean you see that things are slower, but
> one as no
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589
--- Comment #10 from Judea ---
(In reply to Yann Ylavic from comment #7)
> So it seems that you need help somehow, please provide the requested
> informations.
Hence this ticket, and yes, will do
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65592
Bug ID: 65592
Summary: mpm_event does not create new child after
MaxConnectionsPerChild is hit
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.49
Hardware: PC
OS: Li
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589
--- Comment #11 from Ruediger Pluem ---
(In reply to Judea from comment #8)
> (In reply to Ruediger Pluem from comment #2)
> > In order to investigate further we would also need:
> >
> > 1. Coming soon, needs redaction
> > 2. Coming soon, need
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65592
--- Comment #1 from Ruediger Pluem ---
Created attachment 38046
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38046&action=edit
Correctly account processes
Can you please try if the attached patch fixes your issue?
--
You are receiv
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589
--- Comment #12 from Judea ---
(In reply to Ruediger Pluem from comment #11)
> (In reply to Judea from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Ruediger Pluem from comment #2)
> > > In order to investigate further we would also need:
> > >
> > > 1. Coming
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589
Judea changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38042|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590
--- Comment #13 from Sylvain Cresto ---
Yes, in my case :
Patch 38043 alone : good
Patch 38045 alone : bad
Patch 38043 + 38045 : good
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65593
Bug ID: 65593
Summary: MDMessageCmd: event 'ocsp-renewed' is undocumented
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4-HEAD
Hardware: All
URL: https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/en/mod
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65592
alex2g...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alex2g...@gmail.com
--
You are r
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65592
--- Comment #2 from Matt Zuba ---
Thank you for the quick patch. I've applied it on top of the Apache source for
Ubuntu from Ondřej Surý found at
https://launchpad.net/~ondrej/+archive/ubuntu/apache2 and it has solved the
problem in 2.4.49.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590
Yann Ylavic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Keywords|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57691
Yann Ylavic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||scre...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from Ya
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57691
Yann Ylavic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|PatchAvailable |FixedInTrunk
--- Comment #8 from Yann Yl
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589
Ruediger Pluem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65592
--- Comment #3 from Ruediger Pluem ---
Committed to trunk a r1893520.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65592
Ruediger Pluem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||FixedInTrunk,
|
43 matches
Mail list logo