On Nov 30, 2006, at 11:13 AM, Henrik Nilsson wrote:
> The problem with that is that someone getting the sources might get
> the idea that the preprocessed file is an actual source file and
try
> to modify it (or just make sense of it, imagine someone trying to
read
> a happy parser...).
On Nov 30, 2006, at 2:14 AM, Duncan Coutts wrote:
- are there strong reasons for putting preprocessed files in src?
Mostly, not having got round to doing it. If you're volunteering to
look
into doing this, then great!
I wish I had the time... I have the feeling that this would be a non-
On Nov 29, 2006, at 10:21 PM, Stefan Holdermans wrote:
- are there strong reasons for putting preprocessed files in src?
One reason could be that, when distributing *sources*, you'd want
the generated file to be included as well (that is, you want to
regard it as a source file), for the s
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 17:12 +0100, Ulf Norell wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Currently when Cabal preprocesses a module the result ends up in the
> source directory. I would have expected it to end up in dist, since
> it's a generated file and not a source file.
I would tend to agree. Wherever possible I t
