> Am I missing anything important?
Option to allow fsync on the commitlog before ack-ing the client.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> Tentative changelog for 0.4 is being worked on over in
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-321. For convenience,
> here is t
Tentative changelog for 0.4 is being worked on over in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-321. For convenience,
here is the text so far:
* On-disk data format has changed to allow billions of keys/rows per
node instead of only millions
* Scan all sstables for all queries to avoi
Also possibly of interest: issues fixed in 0.4
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310865&fixfor=12313862&resolution=1&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> To recap: our mission with 0.3, as I see
To recap: our mission with 0.3, as I see it, was to add features that
allow people to start modeling their app correctly on cassandra (range
queries and delete support) and file off the worst of the rough edges
from the initial code import. Mission accomplished.
But 0.3 is already obsolete in a l
s issues especially.) But IMO we
should not let scope creep too much for our first Apache release.
-Jonathan
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Jonathan Ellis
wrote:
Someone asked on IRC if there is a roadmap for Cassandra. This is a
good discussion to have. :)
Personally my priority list looks
han
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
Someone asked on IRC if there is a roadmap for Cassandra. This is a
good discussion to have. :)
Personally my priority list looks like this:
High priority:
1. range queries [which requires the partitioner changes we've been d
ffort. :)
>
> Also, if there's other issues that you think should be on the 0.3 list
> feel free to add them. (Correctness issues especially.) But IMO we
> should not let scope creep too much for our first Apache release.
>
> -Jonathan
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:51
let scope creep too much for our first Apache release.
-Jonathan
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> Someone asked on IRC if there is a roadmap for Cassandra. This is a
> good discussion to have. :)
>
> Personally my priority list looks like this:
>
> High priority
Someone asked on IRC if there is a roadmap for Cassandra. This is a
good discussion to have. :)
Personally my priority list looks like this:
High priority:
1. range queries [which requires the partitioner changes we've been discussing]
2. make cassandra not allow itself to run out of m
