Re: [CentOS] looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect

2009-04-15 Thread Paul Berger
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Victor Padro wrote: > FreeNAS/Openfiler(CentOS) can be used for file sharing and it supports RAID > also. > Openfiler uses rPath Linux http://www.openfiler.com/community They have not used CentOS for some time I think. AsteriskNOW recently switched from using

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail forwarding external email sent to root

2009-04-15 Thread Neil Aggarwal
Benjamin: Thanks for responding. I guess that facility just does not exist in sendmail. I broke down and wrote a custom jilter (Java based milter) to do it. It is actually working very well and gives me a lot of flexibility. Thanks, Neil -- Neil Aggarwal, (832)245-7314, www.JAMMConsul

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail forwarding external email sent to root

2009-04-15 Thread Benjamin Smith
Three ideas come to mind: 1) announce a different public name than the local machine name. A) EG: machine name:donttellanyone.theservername.com public (DNS) name: www.theservername.com B) Then set up virtusertable entry routing r...@donttellanyone.these

Re: [CentOS] coolkey

2009-04-15 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 5:39 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 4:45 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >> >>> anyone familiar with coolkey, an interface for smartcards?  apparently >>> its built into centos5, but I don't seem to see it for centos4, and i >>>

[CentOS] Sendmail forwarding external email sent to root

2009-04-15 Thread Neil Aggarwal
Hello: On a CentOS5 machine I set up for a client, in /etc/aliases, I set root's mail to forward to my email address so I can get notices from cron, etc. Unfortunately, I am now getting a lot of spam which is sent to r...@theservername.com How can I tell sendmail to not accept external email to

Re: [CentOS] re-install package

2009-04-15 Thread John Thomas
Scott Silva wrote: > And the right repositories have to be online! Finally, a successful commercial repository. -- Sincerely, John Thomas ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] re-install package

2009-04-15 Thread Steve Bassi
on 4-15-2009 10:55 AM Paul Heinlein spake the following: > On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Jim Perrin wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:12 PM, David G. Miller >> wrote: >> Finally ! 10 years after apt :) >>> I saw a t-shirt advertised recently that said "apt-get girlfriend". >>> I'm guessing yum st

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 and XFS

2009-04-15 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>xfs kmod's for centos-5 have so far been done within the centos loop, >but this is interesting - looks like 5.4 might have a tech-preview for >xfs included in. I never thought of that given that they come from the plus repo. So its only a matter of time then before it appears for the 5.3 kernels.

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 and XFS

2009-04-15 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 04/15/2009 08:58 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > Looking at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469401 > has me a bit unsure about the kmod for 5.3's kernel, is not expected > to appear? xfs kmod's for centos-5 have so far been done within the centos loop, but this is interesting - looks

Re: [CentOS] coolkey

2009-04-15 Thread John R Pierce
Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 4:45 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > >> anyone familiar with coolkey, an interface for smartcards? apparently >> its built into centos5, but I don't seem to see it for centos4, and i >> need to support both (actually, we have a lot more c4 syste

Re: [CentOS] coolkey

2009-04-15 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 4:45 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > anyone familiar with coolkey, an interface for smartcards?  apparently > its built into centos5, but I don't seem to see it for centos4, and i > need to support both (actually, we have a lot more c4 systems in > production than 5)... > > does

[CentOS] coolkey

2009-04-15 Thread John R Pierce
anyone familiar with coolkey, an interface for smartcards? apparently its built into centos5, but I don't seem to see it for centos4, and i need to support both (actually, we have a lot more c4 systems in production than 5)... does anyone know offhand where to find el4 RPMs for this and its re

Re: [CentOS] rsync to full disk

2009-04-15 Thread Les Mikesell
Scott Silva wrote: > on 4-15-2009 1:49 PM Les Mikesell spake the following: >> MHR wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Les Mikesell >>> wrote: I recently noticed that an "rsync -av" to a full disk keeps sending files even after the target is out of space. Has it always done th

Re: [CentOS] Can not get IP address

2009-04-15 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Ugo Bellavance wrote: > Anand Vaddarapu a écrit : >> while installing centos 5.2 i enabled dhcp. centos machine did not get >> IP address and can not get to internet. > What is your internet connection?  If it is cable modem, reset your > modem and try again. An

Re: [CentOS] Can not get IP address

2009-04-15 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Ugo Bellavance wrote: > Anand Vaddarapu a écrit : >> while installing centos 5.2 i enabled dhcp. centos machine did not get >> IP address and can not get to internet. > What is your internet connection?  If it is cable modem, reset your > modem and try again. An

Re: [CentOS] rsync to full disk

2009-04-15 Thread Scott Silva
on 4-15-2009 1:49 PM Les Mikesell spake the following: > MHR wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Les Mikesell >> wrote: >>> I recently noticed that an "rsync -av" to a full disk keeps sending >>> files even after the target is out of space. Has it always done that? >>> I suppose it is re

Re: [CentOS] rsync to full disk

2009-04-15 Thread Les Mikesell
MHR wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> I recently noticed that an "rsync -av" to a full disk keeps sending >> files even after the target is out of space. Has it always done that? >> I suppose it is reasonable to keep trying in case it subsequently >> crosses a moun

Re: [CentOS] rsync to full disk

2009-04-15 Thread MHR
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > I recently noticed that an "rsync -av" to a full disk keeps sending > files even after the target is out of space.  Has it always done that? > I suppose it is reasonable to keep trying in case it subsequently > crosses a mount point or space

[CentOS] 5.3 and XFS

2009-04-15 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Looking at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469401 has me a bit unsure about the kmod for 5.3's kernel, is not expected to appear? Thanks! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Sharing RAM between VM

2009-04-15 Thread luc...@lastdot.org
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Larry wrote: > Hi, all! > I have a server with 4 virtual machines ( using xen). Is there a way to > make them share RAM? I found out something about balloons, but it didn't > distribute RAM dynamically. So I decided that xen can't achieve that. > I tried luci and r

Re: [CentOS] Building a kernel without kabichk

2009-04-15 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Terry Hull wrote: > Did you get it to build with kabichk turned off? > > I had gotten older packages to build as below, but 128.1.6 was giving > errors.  I can get the kernel to build with kabichk turned on with no real > problems.  Also here are the kernel packa

Re: [CentOS] re-install package

2009-04-15 Thread Scott Silva
on 4-15-2009 10:55 AM Paul Heinlein spake the following: > On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Jim Perrin wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:12 PM, David G. Miller >> wrote: >> Finally ! 10 years after apt �:) >>> I saw a t-shirt advertised recently that said "apt-get girlfriend". >>> �I'm guessing yum

Re: [CentOS] re-install package

2009-04-15 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Jim Perrin wrote: On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:12 PM, David G. Miller wrote: Finally ! 10 years after apt  :) I saw a t-shirt advertised recently that said "apt-get girlfriend".  I'm guessing yum still can't do that ;-). I haven't seen it work all that well in apt either.

Re: [CentOS] re-install package

2009-04-15 Thread Jim Perrin
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:12 PM, David G. Miller wrote: >> Finally ! 10 years after apt  :) > I saw a t-shirt advertised recently that said "apt-get girlfriend".  I'm > guessing yum still can't do that ;-). I haven't seen it work all that well in apt either. I'm guessing it requires additional

Re: [CentOS] re-install package

2009-04-15 Thread David G. Miller
Dag Wieers wrote: > On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Erik Laxdal wrote: >> > Jerry Geis wrote: >> >>> >> I tried to install alsa 1.0.19 on centos 5.3 64 - did not work - compile >>> >> errors. >>> >> >>> >> I need to re-install alsa-lib and alsa-util . >>> >> I dont want to do rpm -e first on those pack

[CentOS] rsync to full disk

2009-04-15 Thread Les Mikesell
I recently noticed that an "rsync -av" to a full disk keeps sending files even after the target is out of space. Has it always done that? I suppose it is reasonable to keep trying in case it subsequently crosses a mount point or space becomes available but I expected it to quit on that sort of

Re: [CentOS] Using cdrecord on CentOS

2009-04-15 Thread Robert Heller
At Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:22:28 +0200 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Robert Heller a écrit : > > > > An audio CD is not like a data CD. It does not have a 'file system'. > > It is a collection of data tracks, containing cdda files. > > > > Yeah, I know. But then, AFAIK, dd is supposed to han

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 50, Issue 9

2009-04-15 Thread centos-announce-request
ors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http:/

[CentOS] IO accounting

2009-04-15 Thread Chris Zimmerman
Just a general question to CentOS users, I'm curious if there is a supported or known working kernel newer than 2.6.20 that has IO accounting support. I know I could built it from source but I'd rather use a more tested one from a repo of some variety if possible. I'm referring to this feature. ht

Re: [CentOS] Using cdrecord on CentOS

2009-04-15 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 18:22 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Robert Heller a écrit : > > > > An audio CD is not like a data CD. It does not have a 'file system'. > > It is a collection of data tracks, containing cdda files. > > > > Yeah, I know. But then, AFAIK, dd is supposed to handle these "bin

Re: [CentOS] Using cdrecord on CentOS

2009-04-15 Thread Niki Kovacs
Robert Heller a écrit : > > An audio CD is not like a data CD. It does not have a 'file system'. > It is a collection of data tracks, containing cdda files. > Yeah, I know. But then, AFAIK, dd is supposed to handle these "binary sausages" as well. Meaning: take that input (whatever it is) and

Re: [CentOS] looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect

2009-04-15 Thread Victor Padro
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Rainer Duffner wrote: > > > >> - if possible fail-over / high availability support. > >> > >> > > > > > > For free? > > ;-) > > > > > >> I need to support about 15 - 30 (some part time) students, so I would > >> like to keep the costs low. If

Re: [CentOS] Using cdrecord on CentOS

2009-04-15 Thread Robert Heller
At Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:46:20 +0200 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Michael A. Peters a écrit : > > >> > >> 1) Am I supposed to be root to use cdrecord and burn an .iso file? > > > > I've found it works much better if you are root. > > > > I tried both, and see: cdrecord complains about not

Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers

2009-04-15 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 10:08 +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote: > >-Original Message- > >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf > >Of Michael A. Peters > >Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 5:57 PM > >To: CentOS mailing list > >Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er)

Re: [CentOS] looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect

2009-04-15 Thread Les Mikesell
Rainer Duffner wrote: > >> - if possible fail-over / high availability support. >> >> > > > For free? > ;-) > > >> I need to support about 15 - 30 (some part time) students, so I would >> like to keep the costs low. If it's free, so much better. SME works >> for most of the stuff, but it st

Re: [CentOS] Using cdrecord on CentOS

2009-04-15 Thread John Doe
From: Niki Kovacs > > Couldn't it be the copy protection...? > In theory, dd should also take care of copying the copy protection, > isn't it? I think I am confusing with something else. The trick they used was to put errors. It would still play with hifi players (error correction codes), but

Re: [CentOS] looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect

2009-04-15 Thread Les Mikesell
Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking for a (preferably free) alternative to SME / Clark Connect. > > I basically need the following: > - firewall > - nat > - VPN > - bandwidth limiting / monitoring > - email (SMTP / POP3 / IMAP) & groupware > - file & printer sharing > - RAID support > -

Re: [CentOS] Using cdrecord on CentOS

2009-04-15 Thread Niki Kovacs
John Doe a écrit : > > Couldn't it be the copy protection...? In theory, dd should also take care of copying the copy protection, isn't it? :o) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Sharing RAM between VM

2009-04-15 Thread nate
Larry wrote: > Thank you, for all your answers! > > What about the other question? Can clustering help in completing this > task? I thought cluster nodes are sharing RAM on default ( obviously I > was wrong). Depends what your goal is, if you want to run a cluster with shared memory between system

Re: [CentOS] looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect

2009-04-15 Thread Rainer Duffner
Rudi Ahlers schrieb: > Hi all, > > I'm looking for a (preferably free) alternative to SME / Clark Connect. > > I basically need the following: > - firewall > - nat > - VPN > - bandwidth limiting / monitoring > I'd split these functions to a separate device, using pfSense on embedded hardware (

Re: [CentOS] Using cdrecord on CentOS

2009-04-15 Thread John Doe
From: Niki Kovacs > Now I did that for data CDs, and it works very well. I thought, normally > this *should* also work for audio CDs, so I gave that a spin. But > everytime I try it, dd stops short and gives me an "Input/output error" > for /dev/hdc. Couldn't it be the copy protection...? JD

Re: [CentOS] Can not get IP address

2009-04-15 Thread Ugo Bellavance
Anand Vaddarapu a écrit : > Hi, > > while installing centos 5.2 i enabled dhcp. centos machine did not get > IP address and can not get to internet. > > ifconfig results > Link encap:Local Loopback > inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.255.255.0 > inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host > UP Loopback RUNNING

Re: [CentOS] Using cdrecord on CentOS

2009-04-15 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 10:45 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 15:46 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote: > > Michael A. Peters a écrit : > > > > >> > > >> 1) Am I supposed to be root to use cdrecord and burn an .iso file? > > > > > > I've found it works much better if you are root. >

Re: [CentOS] looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect

2009-04-15 Thread Victor Padro
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking for a (preferably free) alternative to SME / Clark Connect. > > I basically need the following: > - firewall > - nat > - VPN > - bandwidth limiting / monitoring > - email (SMTP / POP3 / IMAP) & groupware > - file & prin

Re: [CentOS] re-install package

2009-04-15 Thread Dag Wieers
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Erik Laxdal wrote: > Jerry Geis wrote: >> I tried to install alsa 1.0.19 on centos 5.3 64 - did not work - compile >> errors. >> >> I need to re-install alsa-lib and alsa-util . >> I dont want to do rpm -e first on those packages as dependcy is crazy. >> I know they were insta

Re: [CentOS] Using cdrecord on CentOS

2009-04-15 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 15:46 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Michael A. Peters a écrit : > > >> > >> 1) Am I supposed to be root to use cdrecord and burn an .iso file? > > > > I've found it works much better if you are root. > > > > I tried both, and see: cdrecord complains about not being able to

[CentOS] looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect

2009-04-15 Thread Rudi Ahlers
Hi all, I'm looking for a (preferably free) alternative to SME / Clark Connect. I basically need the following: - firewall - nat - VPN - bandwidth limiting / monitoring - email (SMTP / POP3 / IMAP) & groupware - file & printer sharing - RAID support - if possible fail-over / high availability sup

Re: [CentOS] Using cdrecord on CentOS

2009-04-15 Thread Niki Kovacs
Michael A. Peters a écrit : >> >> 1) Am I supposed to be root to use cdrecord and burn an .iso file? > > I've found it works much better if you are root. > I tried both, and see: cdrecord complains about not being able to set certain priorities while being run as user, which induces a high ris

Re: [CentOS] Many missing updates for CentOS 4?

2009-04-15 Thread Karanbir Singh
Tom G. Christensen wrote: > According to centos-announce there's been no updates for CentOS 4 > i386/x86_64 since the seamonkey errata (CESA-2009:0325) on 2009-03-06. ... > Is there any work being done on these? Yes, Tru and I are going to fix this issue today, also over the next few days try an

Re: [CentOS] rt3 3.8.2 latest version as rpm for C5?

2009-04-15 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Rainer Traut wrote on Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:54:57 +0200: > >> I really do not want to install f10. :O > > > > You could run it in a VM. > > Yeah, but that means installing after all... :D Right, right, it sounded like you were contemplating to replace the bare metal OS and didn't like that ...

Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers

2009-04-15 Thread Sorin Srbu
>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Alfred von Campe >Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 7:51 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers > >FWIW, I don't use DKMS but this homegrown script i

Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers

2009-04-15 Thread Sorin Srbu
>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Michael A. Peters >Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 5:57 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers > >> Strangely enough, only the systems running an A

Re: [CentOS] rt3 3.8.2 latest version as rpm for C5?

2009-04-15 Thread Rainer Traut
Am 15.04.2009 02:12, schrieb Jim Perrin: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:07 AM, Rainer Traut wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I know, epel has rt3 in version 3.6.x. >> And - sadly - for version 3.8.x the perl module dependencies are way >> ahead of what I can find in epel or rpmforge. >> But we really need some of

Re: [CentOS] rt3 3.8.2 latest version as rpm for C5?

2009-04-15 Thread Rainer Traut
Am 14.04.2009 19:31, schrieb Kai Schaetzl: > Rainer Traut wrote on Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:07:23 +0200: > >> I really do not want to install f10. :O > > You could run it in a VM. Yeah, but that means installing after all... :D But I will do that, thx for your answer. Rainer ___

Re: [CentOS] Sharing RAM between VM

2009-04-15 Thread Larry
Thank you, for all your answers! What about the other question? Can clustering help in completing this task? I thought cluster nodes are sharing RAM on default ( obviously I was wrong). >From your answers I'm getting to think that best decision for this task, in my case, is to buy some RAM. I'm n

[CentOS] Many missing updates for CentOS 4?

2009-04-15 Thread Tom G. Christensen
According to centos-announce there's been no updates for CentOS 4 i386/x86_64 since the seamonkey errata (CESA-2009:0325) on 2009-03-06. A quick rundown shows a rather worrying backlog of missing security updates, some more than a month old: 2009:0313 - Moderate: wireshark 2009:0333 - Moderate: