On 11/25/2013 09:10, Warren Young wrote:
> On 11/25/2013 08:22, Wes James wrote:
>> Oh. OK. I didn't realize CentOS wasn't using grub2. Are there any plans
>> for CentOS to move to grub2?
>
> No. Upstream uses grub1, so CentOS uses grub1.
>
> Presumably RHEL7 will use grub2, but there's no good
On 11/26/2013 3:58 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> The $200 comes from googling D865GBFL price.
that board is expensive because its ancient, there's likely very little
NOS (new old stock) left in the channel.
the 865G chipset was new in May 2003. An Atom based netbook has more
horsepower. so d
On 11/26/2013 4:38 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 02:00 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>> I'm about to create a new CentOS 3 VM for testing, since we still have a
>> bunch of deployed machines running that OS.
>>
>> (Don't yell at me about using old OSes. These machines won't get
>> "un-deploye
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Nov 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>>> Oh, right, *just* as I hit , I realized one more thing: you have
>>> checked both ~/.xsession-errors and /var/log/Xorg.0.log, right?
>>
>> I'd looked at .../Xorg.0.log , bu
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Michael Hennebry
wrote:
>>
> The $200 comes from googling D865GBFL price.
>
> $300 desktops? Where?
Search for 'refurbished desktop' on tigerdirect.com.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Depends on the cost of the system, and the budget... and it sounds to me
> as though the OP is working on his own system, and his budget approaches
> $1 as a limit I understand that all too well (though it's not an issue
> for me these days).
My
On 11/26/2013 02:00 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> I'm about to create a new CentOS 3 VM for testing, since we still have a
> bunch of deployed machines running that OS.
>
> (Don't yell at me about using old OSes. These machines won't get
> "un-deployed" until they fall over dead of natural causes.
On 11/25/2013 06:42 PM, Lists wrote:
> I recently purchased a set of ASRock Intel i5 MB/CPU combos for a budget
> compute cluster. Every time we load up a system and try to boot with a
> recent EL6/64 ISO, we get a message that reads:
>
> > This hardware (or a combination thereof) is not support
> What I'm hoping for is some way to get a "CentOS 3.10", being 3.9 with
> the vault updates directory contents merged in.
>
> Is there a straightforward way to do that, or is schlepping around
> folders full of RPMs actually the best way to go?
Yes, it can be done. I did it a while back, bu
Looks like you have more than one path to the devices. I would expect to
see *4* devices.
Cheers,
Cliff
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 2:36 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator <
goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I do have an iscsi storage with two raidsets. I'm logged in to the
> target
On 11/26/2013 1:38 PM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
> It doesn't necessarily have to be on an http server. Just in an
> accessible location (e.g. via NFS) and use afile:// URL in the .repo
> file.
true, it doesn't, but thats generally been the easiest to setup for
me. NFS has required futzing around wi
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:32 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 12:00 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>> It seems wasteful to install the last published version of the OS, then
>> scp over my local update RPMs, freshen from those,*then* check with the
>> vault for yet more updates.
>>
>> What I'm h
On 11/26/2013 12:00 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> It seems wasteful to install the last published version of the OS, then
> scp over my local update RPMs, freshen from those,*then* check with the
> vault for yet more updates.
>
> What I'm hoping for is some way to get a "CentOS 3.10", being 3.9 with
>
Warren Young wrote:
> I'm about to create a new CentOS 3 VM for testing, since we still have a
> bunch of deployed machines running that OS.
>
> (Don't yell at me about using old OSes. These machines won't get
> "un-deployed" until they fall over dead of natural causes. Until the
> last one dies,
On 11/26/2013 12:17 PM, Lists wrote:
> Chipset is Intel Q87. i5 4670, 3.4 Ghz, LGA1150 socket. ASROCK Q87 Vpro
> MB, 32 GB DDR3/1600 RAM.
>
>> >do you still get that error after a `yum update -y` and a reboot ?
> Error only shows during the install, just before loading X11 for the
> setup. Again,
On 11/25/2013 05:04 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 11/25/2013 4:42 PM, Lists wrote:
>> I recently purchased a set of ASRock Intel i5 MB/CPU combos for a budget
>> compute cluster. Every time we load up a system and try to boot with a
>> recent EL6/64 ISO, we get a message that reads:
>>
>>> This
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 1:05 PM, wrote:
>
> Depends on the cost of the system, and the budget... and it sounds to me
> as though the OP is working on his own system, and his budget approaches
> $1 as a limit I understand that all too well (though it's not an issue
> for me these days).
I und
I'm about to create a new CentOS 3 VM for testing, since we still have a
bunch of deployed machines running that OS.
(Don't yell at me about using old OSes. These machines won't get
"un-deployed" until they fall over dead of natural causes. Until the
last one dies, we need test and build VMs
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:20 PM, wrote:
> Are you saying it never crashes with fedora but it does with centos?
>>>
>>> F14 crashed once since CentOS started crashing.
>>
>> Sounds like CentOS hits something somewhere that FC14 hits more rarely.
>
> Or just random and to
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:20 PM, wrote:
Are you saying it never crashes with fedora but it does with centos?
>>
>> F14 crashed once since CentOS started crashing.
>
> Sounds like CentOS hits something somewhere that FC14 hits more rarely.
>
Or just random and too small a sample to draw con
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 11:34 -0600, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> > Michael Hennebry wrote:
> >> Ouch.
> >> $200+ before installation,
> >> and I'd still have a computer some Linuxes don't like.
> >
> > Expensive board. Is this at home? I got a Gigabyte
Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Oh, right, *just* as I hit , I realized one more thing: you have
>> checked both ~/.xsession-errors and /var/log/Xorg.0.log, right?
>
> I'd looked at .../Xorg.0.log , but until now, not ~/.xsession-errors :
> (polkit-gnome
Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2013, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Michael Hennebry
>> wrote:
> It is getting long in the tooth. (I'm about to replace my m/b of the
> same
vintage at home.)
>> Are you saying it never crashes with fedora but it d
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Michael Hennebry
> wrote:
It is getting long in the tooth. (I'm about to replace my m/b of the same
>>> vintage at home.)
>>
>> Ouch.
>> $200+ before installation,
>> and I'd still have a computer some Linuxes don't
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Michael Hennebry
wrote:
>>> It is getting long in the tooth. (I'm about to replace my m/b of the same
>> vintage at home.)
>
> Ouch.
> $200+ before installation,
> and I'd still have a computer some Linuxes don't like.
Yeah, probably better to get something that
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Oh, right, *just* as I hit , I realized one more thing: you have
> checked both ~/.xsession-errors and /var/log/Xorg.0.log, right?
I'd looked at .../Xorg.0.log , but until now, not ~/.xsession-errors :
GNOME_KEYRING_SOCKET=/tmp/keyring-BWwFtW/socket
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> Ouch.
>> $200+ before installation,
>> and I'd still have a computer some Linuxes don't like.
>
> Expensive board. Is this at home? I got a Gigabyte board and Core I-3
Yes. It's the only computer I've owned with
either a h
Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Michael Hennebry
>> wrote:
> Keep an eagle eye on dmesg and the logs. If you can, bring
machine down
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:57:26AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Michael Hennebry wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >> Michael Hennebry wrote:
> >>> The computer is a DakTEch Freedom 4 P4 DDR System.
> >>> The system board is a D865GBFL w/LAN,audio & video
> >>> Processor
Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Michael Hennebry wrote:
>>> The computer is a DakTEch Freedom 4 P4 DDR System.
>>> The system board is a D865GBFL w/LAN,audio & video
>>> Processor Intel Pentium 4 3.2 Ghz 800FSB
>>> I got it in 2006.
>>
>> It is getting lon
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> The computer is a DakTEch Freedom 4 P4 DDR System.
>> The system board is a D865GBFL w/LAN,audio & video
>> Processor Intel Pentium 4 3.2 Ghz 800FSB
>> I got it in 2006.
>
> It is getting long in the tooth. (I'm about to re
On 25.11.2013 23:56, Peter wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 05:28 AM, Халезов Иван wrote:
>> Is it possible to install CentOS 6 without disk partitioning?
> Yes, it is, but there are a couple of caveats:
>
> 1. You can't use anaconda to do so directly.
>
> 2. You can't boot through grub (as someone else po
On 11/26/2013 03:11 PM, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
[snip]
> The current kernel I am running is 2.6.32-358.23.2, but I can't tell whether
> it
> has CONFIG_X86_MCE enabled. How can I find this out?
$ grep CONFIG_X86_MCE /boot/config-2.6.32-358.23.2.el6.x86_64
CONFIG_X86_MCE=y
CONFIG_X86_MCE_INTEL=y
CO
On further, further investigation, it looks like according to the mcelog install
guide at http://www.mcelog.org/installation.html, I could "roll my own" for
32-bit
CentOS 6:
"For bad page offlining you will need a 2.6.33+ kernel or a 2.6.32 kernel with
the soft offlining capability backported (li
Hi,
I do have an iscsi storage with two raidsets. I'm logged in to the
target and get two devices: /dev/sdb and /dev/sdc.
After formatting the devices with ext4 I realised, that I had used a
wrong label, so I tried to relabel the devices.
But now I'm confused:
doing a e2label /dev/sdb or /dev/s
From: Glenn Eychaner
> Further investigation seems to indicate that these events should be handled
> by "mcelog" or "mced". However, there is no /var/log/mcelog,
> nor do I have a
> "mcelog" or "mced" binary, nor does yum seem to contain
> anything related
> (based on "yum whatprovides '*/mcelo
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Lists wrote:
> I recently purchased a set of ASRock Intel i5 MB/CPU combos for a budget
> compute cluster. Every time we load up a system and try to boot with a
> recent EL6/64 ISO, we get a message that reads:
>
> > This hardware (or a combination thereof) is not
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 09:25:55AM -0300, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
> Further investigation seems to indicate that these events should be handled
> by "mcelog" or "mced". However, there is no /var/log/mcelog, nor do I have a
> "mcelog" or "mced" binary, nor does yum seem to contain anything related
> (
Further investigation seems to indicate that these events should be handled
by "mcelog" or "mced". However, there is no /var/log/mcelog, nor do I have a
"mcelog" or "mced" binary, nor does yum seem to contain anything related
(based on "yum whatprovides '*/mcelog'" and similar queries).
Thus, I st
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 11/26/2013 01:42 PM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Ken Smith
>
>> What I'm trying to accomplish is a a simple firewall type system for a
>> public WiFi, that redirects users to a Web page when they first connect,
>> accepts some credentials such as an e-mail address and allows them
>> access to the '
From: Ken Smith
> What I'm trying to accomplish is a a simple firewall type system for a
> public WiFi, that redirects users to a Web page when they first connect,
> accepts some credentials such as an e-mail address and allows them
> access to the 'net. Other features like limiting the volum
On 26/11/13 00:42, Lists wrote:
> I recently purchased a set of ASRock Intel i5 MB/CPU combos for a budget
> compute cluster. Every time we load up a system and try to boot with a
> recent EL6/64 ISO, we get a message that reads:
>
> > This hardware (or a combination thereof) is not supported by
43 matches
Mail list logo
