On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:32 PM,
wrote:
Dumb question: *how* were you installing? Did you have a kickstart of your
very own? If so... could it have wanted eth0, and the installer called it
em1?
In my case there was no kickstart -- just a plain install from the ISO image,
and the complaint from
On 12/04/2014 05:45 AM, David McGuffey wrote:
md0 is made up of two 250G disks on which the OS and a very large /var
partions resides for a number of virtual machines.
...
Challenge is that disk 0 of md0 is the problem and it has a 524M /boot
partition outside of the raid partition.
Assuming
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Stan Cruise wrote:
> This question may not belong in the Centos.org list, but I do want to
> compile against this distro. Please advise.
>
>
> The question:
>
> Can I be pointed at methods to learn to compile source against a distro. I
> have software development ba
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 15:16:28 -0700
Stan Cruise wrote:
> Can I be pointed at methods to learn to compile source against a distro.
I think you need to ask a more specific question, but this is an overview of
the process to give you a place to start with further reading. Google is your
friend he
This question may not belong in the Centos.org list, but I do want to
compile against this distro. Please advise.
The question:
Can I be pointed at methods to learn to compile source against a distro.
I have software development background (but too long ago to be
specifically useful; however
> -Original Message-
> From: Cal Webster
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 13:31
>
> On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 13:09 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote:
> > That is true, which we are using ours for critical things.
> Guess RHEL
> > will be the way to go till Centos is maybe approved for critical
>
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:32 PM, wrote:
> Jeremy Hoel wrote:
> > We noticed this when installing onto some new Dell R320's.. it might have
> > something to do with hardware that the device had that the older kernel
> > might not have known about. Nothing seemed wrong and everything seemed
> to
>
On Thu, December 4, 2014 12:29, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> Re: SELinux. Do I just build a local policy or is there some boolean setting
> needed to handle this? I could not find one if there is but. . .
>
Anyone see any problem with generating a custom policy consisting of the
following?
grep av
Am 04.12.2014 um 18:29 schrieb James B. Byrne:
I am seeing these avc messages on a newly commissioned and up-to-date CentOs-6
virtual guest:
time->Thu Dec 4 12:14:58 2014
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1417713298.610:60522): arch=c03e syscall=2
success=no exit=-13 a0=7fd70e6de1e6 a1=0 a2=1b6 a
We noticed this when installing onto some new Dell R320's.. it might have
something to do with hardware that the device had that the older kernel
might not have known about. Nothing seemed wrong and everything seemed to
install ok (we would also update the kernel in the install process, so that
pr
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 13:09 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote:
> That is true, which we are using ours for critical things. Guess RHEL
> will be the way to go till Centos is maybe approved for critical
> systems as well.
That's really up to the program manager in which the machine would be
used. He would
Do you mean as in terms of updates? I forget some of the STIGs and
don't deal with that part of our projects.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jason Ricles
>> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:42
>>
>> Gotcha, I also work with DoD for N
When the installer complains that it has detected unsupported hardware,
is there any way to tell just what it didn't like? Following the URL in
the message just ends up at the RHEL Hardware Certification page, which
isn't much help. The installer seemed quite willing to continue with
the install
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Ricles
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:42
>
> Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by
> that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can
> use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license.
That is true, which we are using ours for critical things. Guess RHEL
will be the way to go till Centos is maybe approved for critical
systems as well.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:41 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote:
>> Gotcha, I also work with DoD for
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:30 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Cal Webster wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 08:08 -0500, mark wrote:
> >> On 12/03/14 17:34, Cal Webster wrote:
> >> > Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in
> >> > CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console lo
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:41 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote:
> Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by
> that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can
> use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license.
I would recommend RHEL for critical sys
I am seeing these avc messages on a newly commissioned and up-to-date CentOs-6
virtual guest:
time->Thu Dec 4 12:14:58 2014
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1417713298.610:60522): arch=c03e syscall=2
success=no exit=-13 a0=7fd70e6de1e6 a1=0 a2=1b6 a3=0 items=0 ppid=2698
pid=4294 auid=0 uid=0 gid=0
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:22 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote:
> I thought DoD used RHEL and not Centos, or did Centos did approved
> DADEMS recently?
DoD does use RHEL for the critical infrastructure hosts and in our case
for training simulators. The issue here was with a separate non-DoD
asset used to r
On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 18:20 -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Cal Webster
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 17:35
> > To: CentOS List
> > Subject: [CentOS] Firefox fails to authenti
Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by
that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can
use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jason R
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Ricles
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:23
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox fails to authenticate .mil
> sites with New DoDCAC
>
> I thought DoD used RHEL and not Centos, or did Centos did approved
> DADEMS recently?
DADMS
I thought DoD used RHEL and not Centos, or did Centos did approved
DADEMS recently?
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
> Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in
> CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console logins, only for email and .mil
> web sites.
>
>
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 08:08 -0500, mark wrote:
> On 12/03/14 17:34, Cal Webster wrote:
> > Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in
> > CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console logins, only for email and .mil
> > web sites.
> >
> > I recently had to get a new DoD CAC (Sma
we have Centos 5.X on DELL servers. Recently we upgrade to BACKEXEC later
version of software and /var/log/messages have following messages:
Dec 3 18:19:04 ORA1 modprobe: WARNING: Unmatched bracket in ÷ 0E[rŠ£½Øô/N
Dec 3 19:14:45 ORA1 modprobe: WARNING: Unmatched bracket in •§ºÎãù(A[v’¯Íì
Thanks for all the responses. A little more digging revealed:
md0 is made up of two 250G disks on which the OS and a very large /var
partions resides for a number of virtual machines.
md1 is made up of two 2T disks on which /home resides.
Challenge is that disk 0 of md0 is the problem and it ha
Le 04/12/2014 14:24, Ned Slider a écrit :
Sure is. Although you would probably be better off asking on the elrepo
mailing list rather than the CentOS list.
Anything you are particularly interest in?
Not really, but I've been a CentOS user for a few years. Then migrated
to Slackware, but it lo
On 03/12/14 17:10, John Horne wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just installed CentOS 7 onto two servers and applied all the
> current patches. There are currently two kernels installed:
>
> # rpm -q kernel
> kernel-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64
> kernel-3.10.0-123.9.3.el7.x86_64
>
>
> However, if I reboot th
On 04/12/14 13:10, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently installing CentOS 5.11 i386 on an old PC.
>
> Is the ELRepo third-party repository still active and maintained?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Niki Kovacs
Sure is. Although you would probably be better off asking on the elrepo
mailing list rather
Hi,
I'm currently installing CentOS 5.11 i386 on an old PC.
Is the ELRepo third-party repository still active and maintained?
Cheers,
Niki Kovacs
--
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Web : http://www.microlinux.fr
Mail :
Are you seeing other AVCs?
On 12/03/2014 05:36 AM, John Beranek wrote:
> Indeed, thanks Dan - it doesn't get us to a completely clean running that
> would allow us to run our Node app as we are under Passenger with SELinux
> enforcing, but it at least has stopped the excessive amount of AVCs we we
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
32 matches
Mail list logo