On 4 Feb 2016 03:10, "Always Learning" wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 13:57 -0700, Warren Young wrote:
>
> > On Feb 3, 2016, at 10:30 AM, Ricardo J. Barberis
wrote:
> > >
> > > El Miércoles 03/02/2016, Warren Young escribió:
> > >>
> > >> Again, I
On Feb 3, 2016, at 10:18 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> On 02/03/2016 08:59 AM, Warren Young wrote:
>> Again, I don’t know why they couldn’t just do it with links.
>
> Probably because they want to support a read-only root filesystem, working
> toward "stateless"
On 02/03/2016 12:52 PM, Warren Young wrote:
Probably because they want to support a read-only root filesystem, working toward
"stateless" systems.
How does that explain anything? The same RPM that installed the service file
can create a hard link or symlink giving the command an alternate
On Feb 3, 2016, at 10:30 AM, Ricardo J. Barberis wrote:
>
> El Miércoles 03/02/2016, Warren Young escribió:
>>
>> Again, I don’t know why they couldn’t just do it with links.
>
> I guess that's probably to execute scripts and "hide" the name of the
> interpreter, e.g.:
On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 13:57 -0700, Warren Young wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2016, at 10:30 AM, Ricardo J. Barberis
> wrote:
> >
> > El Miércoles 03/02/2016, Warren Young escribió:
> >>
> >> Again, I don’t know why they couldn’t just do it with links.
> >
> > I guess that's
> On Feb 3, 2016, at 10:57 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> The issue: NFS fails to start in CentOS 7 if it cannot resolve any of a
> list of hosts.
>
> Well, my manager had to google to find the *truly* obscure solution that
> uses a deeply oddball syntax.
>
> In
On Feb 3, 2016, at 8:57 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> Notice the *deeply* weird syntax of "=-”.
That syntax comes from make(1), where it means the same thing. make(1) has
been with us since 1977, so I’d think “old and familiar” is a better
description than “deeply weird.”
> And, I read in
Warren Young wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2016, at 8:57 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>> I also don't understand why you'd set as an out-of-the-box default
>> that it should fail to come up if it can't resolve any export host,
>> rather than default to coming up.
>
> You do it for the same reason you’d
The issue: NFS fails to start in CentOS 7 if it cannot resolve any of a
list of hosts.
Well, my manager had to google to find the *truly* obscure solution that
uses a deeply oddball syntax.
In /usr/lib/systemd/system/nfs-server.service, you edit the following line
so that it looks like this:
El Miércoles 03/02/2016, Warren Young escribió:
> On Feb 3, 2016, at 8:57 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > Notice the *deeply* weird syntax of "=-”.
>
> That syntax comes from make(1), where it means the same thing. make(1) has
> been with us since 1977, so I’d think “old and familiar” is a better
On 02/03/2016 08:59 AM, Warren Young wrote:
Again, I don’t know why they couldn’t just do it with links.
Probably because they want to support a read-only root filesystem,
working toward "stateless" systems.
___
CentOS mailing list
11 matches
Mail list logo