Todd Denniston napsal(a):
> I am looking to be a bit more standard in the builds of my CentOS rpms, and
> so I was about to
> install mock but noticed that there is one provided in the centos/5/extras
> and another in epel.
>
> epel is obviously newer, but are there reasons/experiences in this
Karanbir Singh wrote, On 11/03/2009 04:57 AM:
> The mock in extras is what we use to build the distro against and is the
> only version we work with on the buildsystems. depending on what you are
> doing, that issue might or might not be relevant.
>
Thanks for yours and Mr. X's feedback.
Off to
On 11/03/2009 12:09 AM, Todd Denniston wrote:
> Is the extras version the version used by the upstream provider and thus the
> CentOS team keeps it
> around to do the matching builds?
The mock in extras is what we use to build the distro against and is the
only version we work with on the builds
--- On Mon, 11/2/09, Todd Denniston
wrote:
> From: Todd Denniston
> Subject: [CentOS] mock, extras vs epel
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Date: Monday, November 2, 2009, 4:09 PM
> I am looking to be a bit more
> standard in the builds of my CentOS rpms, and so
I am looking to be a bit more standard in the builds of my CentOS rpms, and so
I was about to
install mock but noticed that there is one provided in the centos/5/extras and
another in epel.
epel is obviously newer, but are there reasons/experiences in this group that
would suggest sticking
wi
5 matches
Mail list logo